Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071105

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071105 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 31.13% of octets and 14.36% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.388M 2 10.05M
5 1.474M 10 10.45M
10 1.581M 19 10.95M
50 3.084M 58 17.70M
90 12.31M 59 48.28M
95 21.58M 59 67.55M
99 49.72M 59 159.4M
99.9 155.1M 59 481.2M
99.99 963.4M 119 4.471G
99.999 2.220G 120 13.61G
100 25.83G 121 24.57G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.51% 2.529G
Medium (100-1400B)7.22% 12.06G
Large (1401-1500B)89.82% 150.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.44% 2.407G
Total100.00% 167.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers27.66% 68.70T 28.31% 47.28G 32.49% 2.861M
Encrypted Traffic7.29% 18.09T 7.59% 12.68G 6.57% 578.9k
File Sharing3.53% 8.757T 3.62% 6.042G 2.98% 262.6k
Measurement3.31% 8.226T 1.87% 3.127G 0.29% 25.83k
Advanced Apps2.15% 5.342T 2.20% 3.682G 2.67% 235.2k
Misc0.73% 1.821T 1.32% 2.212G 0.78% 68.48k
Audio/Video0.32% 803.3G 0.31% 518.3M 0.61% 53.89k
Games0.30% 744.5G 0.31% 526.1M 0.40% 34.93k
Unidentified54.71% 135.8T 54.46% 90.96G 53.20% 4.685M
Total100.00% 248.3T 100.00% 167.0G 100.00% 8.806M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.288G900060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
885.0M150042NYSERNet [3756]Abilene [11537]Iperf
875.1M150010U Chicago [160]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
862.4M150016ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]Iperf
519.3M150059Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
461.4M900052INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
284.5M150017Unknown [32361]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf
264.5M150036Unknown [1213]Abilene [11537]Iperf
167.3M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.9M150026NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.728G150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Audiogalaxy
1.048G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]33063 -> 5101
1.012G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]54218 -> 5101
877.7M899460DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]SCXY [14031]1021 -> 988
665.1M150059NYSERNet [3756]Abilene [11537]42552 -> 5011
560.1M150010INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]63002 -> 57652
550.2M150025RIT [4385]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
517.2M150011U Chicago [160]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]42160 -> 63007
508.9M150013INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]LATECH [19564]64004 -> 50006
508.0M150054RIT [4385]SCXY [14031]1021 -> 988

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 722.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers37.64% 300.3T 40.03% 465.5G
Encrypted Traffic4.75% 37.94T 5.02% 58.34G
File Sharing2.76% 22.05T 2.98% 34.68G
Misc2.34% 18.65T 4.27% 49.62G
Audio/Video1.79% 14.27T 1.48% 17.18G
Measurement1.39% 11.10T 1.36% 15.77G
Advanced Apps1.34% 10.65T 1.05% 12.17G
Games0.48% 3.830T 0.78% 9.125G
Unidentified47.51% 379.0T 43.05% 500.6G
Total100.00% 797.9T 100.00% 1.163T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
33.70%
1.61%
1.30%
1.03%
---
268.9T
12.86T
10.35T
8.200T
---
36.91%
1.23%
1.03%
0.85%
---
429.3G
14.34G
12.02G
9.868G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.43%
2.07%
0.25%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.35T
16.51T
1.978T
82.32G
10.26G
---
2.22%
2.52%
0.25%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.87G
29.33G
2.947G
158.3M
29.85M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.91%
0.76%
0.45%
0.40%
0.13%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.298T
6.066T
3.597T
3.172T
1.062T
677.1G
88.06G
45.02G
22.93G
14.86G
2.626G
1.454G
1.011G
---
0.77%
1.08%
0.31%
0.54%
0.11%
0.13%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.941G
12.57G
3.556G
6.334G
1.286G
1.461G
140.5M
96.11M
261.7M
21.79M
3.562M
2.211M
803.6k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
AFS
X11
Telnet
IRC
MS Windows
NFS
NTP
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.10%
0.51%
0.22%
0.20%
0.13%
0.09%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.782T
4.048T
1.766T
1.617T
1.073T
726.4G
211.5G
140.4G
68.34G
63.86G
51.90G
38.55G
33.93G
17.23G
13.24G
543.7M
105.7M
---
1.89%
0.32%
1.28%
0.24%
0.09%
0.21%
0.05%
0.04%
0.05%
0.01%
0.06%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.03G
3.668G
14.91G
2.782G
995.0M
2.459G
588.4M
520.9M
583.5M
105.2M
680.0M
51.22M
68.57M
102.2M
62.69M
3.662M
702.6k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.13%
0.56%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.042T
4.454T
524.6G
158.1G
68.13G
23.21G
2.819G
1.552G
0.000
---
0.74%
0.66%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.592G
7.678G
566.9M
206.7M
91.06M
34.91M
7.760M
3.531M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.32%
0.07%
0.00%
---
10.55T
548.1G
11.25M
---
0.53%
0.83%
0.00%
---
6.128G
9.647G
7.500k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.27%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.13T
407.0G
62.15G
35.30G
11.34G
5.205G
---
0.98%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
11.39G
448.9M
170.5M
79.97M
74.38M
6.536M
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.31%
0.06%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.497T
462.0G
429.5G
241.8G
131.9G
35.24G
32.89G
---
0.34%
0.11%
0.27%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.911G
1.237G
3.195G
330.8M
314.8M
61.92M
74.65M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
47.51%
---
379.0T
---
43.05%
---
500.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
797.9T
---
100.00%
---
1.163T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 548.1G 0.83% 9.647G
IGMP[2]0.00% 45.18M 0.00% 1.257M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 17.36G 0.01% 169.0M
TCP[6]89.98% 717.9T 86.60% 1.007T
UDP[17]6.92% 55.23T 10.26% 119.3G
IPv6[41]0.00% 26.39G 0.01% 99.43M
GRE[47]2.76% 22.00T 1.93% 22.42G
ESP[50]0.25% 1.978T 0.25% 2.947G
AX.25[93]0.00% 10.50M 0.00% 13.50k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.162G 0.00% 43.27M
IPMP[169]0.00% 11.25M 0.00% 7.500k
Other0.02% 163.8G 0.10% 1.146G
Total100.00% 797.9T 100.00% 1.163T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)44.96% 522.8G
Medium (100-1400B)21.54% 250.5G
Large (1401-1500B)33.21% 386.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.29% 3.334G
Total100.00% 1.163T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.32% 768.5T 96.19% 1.118T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.65% 5.165T 0.76% 8.840G
EF [DSCP=46]0.16% 1.272T 0.10% 1.219G
Other2.88% 22.95T 2.95% 34.30G
Total100.00% 797.9T 100.00% 1.163T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.41% 3.251T 0.23% 2.726G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200003.68% 29.34T 2.66% 30.93G
200011.96% 15.67T 1.42% 16.54G
200021.05% 8.399T 0.77% 8.923G
163840.98% 7.847T 0.72% 8.326G
9880.81% 6.475T 0.37% 4.355G