Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071029

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071029 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 32.11% of octets and 14.92% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.383M 4 10.05M
5 1.455M 13 10.36M
10 1.538M 23 10.80M
50 2.964M 58 17.40M
90 10.85M 59 48.70M
95 17.61M 59 70.80M
99 43.68M 59 154.1M
99.9 169.3M 107 460.9M
99.99 940.1M 119 4.790G
99.999 1.344G 128 8.482G
100 13.62G 143 26.51G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.37% 2.286G
Medium (100-1400B)7.18% 11.94G
Large (1401-1500B)90.64% 150.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.81% 1.344G
Total100.00% 166.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers27.91% 69.60T 28.76% 47.86G 32.17% 2.854M
Encrypted Traffic6.75% 16.84T 7.17% 11.92G 5.93% 526.1k
Measurement4.57% 11.39T 1.32% 2.203G 0.24% 21.29k
File Sharing3.23% 8.044T 3.36% 5.584G 2.69% 238.7k
Advanced Apps2.22% 5.545T 2.30% 3.823G 2.86% 253.5k
Misc0.56% 1.395T 1.31% 2.176G 0.94% 83.67k
Games0.34% 855.6G 0.36% 597.2M 0.42% 37.68k
Audio/Video0.28% 691.5G 0.29% 483.9M 0.58% 51.35k
Unidentified54.14% 135.0T 55.14% 91.77G 54.16% 4.804M
Total100.00% 249.4T 100.00% 166.4G 100.00% 8.871M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.555G900060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
980.9M900032CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Abilene [11537]Iperf
948.1M150053Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]Iperf
902.7M900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]Iperf
641.5M150014RIT [4385]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
308.0M150012Unknown [32361]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf
299.4M900029INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
171.8M150012NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.2M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
144.5M137923NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.038G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]57840 -> 5101
1.005G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]47778 -> 5101
498.9M150011INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]LATECH [19564]64001 -> 50002
485.2M150025INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]RIT [4385]988 -> 1022
468.6M150060University College London (SuperJANET SMDS) [3221]Unknown [32361]50731 -> 54330
453.7M150012NCSA [1224]SCXY [14031]43968 -> 3002
407.9M895144DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
394.4M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]55567 -> 5101
317.4M149911UNL [7896]Microsoft London IDC [8075]HTTPS
253.3M150040Oregon State U [4201]UCLA [52]1568 -> 49000

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 748.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.32% 297.6T 40.93% 456.6G
Encrypted Traffic4.67% 36.23T 4.92% 54.92G
File Sharing2.72% 21.10T 3.06% 34.09G
Misc2.18% 16.90T 4.28% 47.76G
Measurement1.82% 14.09T 1.19% 13.26G
Audio/Video1.76% 13.63T 1.47% 16.34G
Advanced Apps1.44% 11.20T 1.16% 12.89G
Games0.48% 3.724T 0.80% 8.955G
Unidentified46.62% 362.1T 42.19% 470.6G
Total100.00% 776.6T 100.00% 1.115T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
34.31%
1.68%
1.23%
1.10%
---
266.5T
13.05T
9.545T
8.549T
---
37.82%
1.32%
0.91%
0.88%
---
421.8G
14.73G
10.18G
9.799G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.47%
1.90%
0.22%
0.07%
0.00%
---
19.19T
14.79T
1.718T
524.2G
5.456G
---
2.19%
2.44%
0.22%
0.06%
0.00%
---
24.47G
27.26G
2.453G
695.5M
24.75M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
0.90%
0.69%
0.45%
0.44%
0.14%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.997T
5.328T
3.474T
3.392T
1.095T
656.5G
78.55G
43.78G
16.80G
15.94G
2.456G
2.433G
341.5M
---
0.76%
1.12%
0.31%
0.59%
0.12%
0.13%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.464G
12.48G
3.437G
6.529G
1.286G
1.466G
125.3M
72.97M
202.8M
19.49M
3.185M
4.200M
375.3k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
Telnet
IRC
NFS
MS Windows
AOL AIM
NTP
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.19%
0.30%
0.23%
0.22%
0.10%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.216T
2.298T
1.803T
1.688T
778.8G
427.4G
217.1G
153.3G
97.91G
59.44G
52.80G
48.33G
30.04G
17.59G
14.07G
1.270G
226.4M
---
1.98%
0.21%
1.30%
0.25%
0.21%
0.09%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.04%
0.01%
0.06%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.08G
2.324G
14.52G
2.790G
2.373G
992.1M
595.1M
497.6M
135.9M
491.9M
70.82M
634.1M
54.39M
108.2M
63.83M
23.41M
634.3k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.75%
0.06%
0.00%
---
13.61T
488.2G
208.8k
---
0.46%
0.73%
0.00%
---
5.087G
8.176G
500.0
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.12%
0.55%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.719T
4.262T
417.1G
135.2G
71.93G
20.20G
4.732G
2.831G
0.000
---
0.74%
0.65%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.216G
7.267G
512.2M
173.1M
87.05M
30.11M
50.04M
7.261M
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.37%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.65T
429.2G
73.86G
43.76G
9.461G
2.796G
---
1.08%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
12.05G
455.2M
214.1M
94.27M
72.43M
3.526M
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.31%
0.05%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.399T
423.6G
422.0G
310.2G
116.5G
31.29G
21.41G
---
0.33%
0.11%
0.29%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.674G
1.174G
3.252G
438.5M
295.0M
76.14M
43.63M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.62%
---
362.1T
---
42.19%
---
470.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
776.6T
---
100.00%
---
1.115T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 488.2G 0.73% 8.176G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.67M 0.00% 1.220M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 30.71G 0.01% 164.2M
TCP[6]89.66% 696.3T 86.56% 965.5G
UDP[17]5.93% 46.02T 9.78% 109.0G
IPv6[41]0.00% 27.17G 0.01% 96.62M
GRE[47]4.06% 31.51T 2.62% 29.25G
ESP[50]0.22% 1.718T 0.22% 2.453G
AX.25[93]0.00% 672.7k 0.00% 7.200k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.168G 0.00% 43.29M
IPMP[169]0.00% 208.8k 0.00% 500.0
Other0.07% 526.6G 0.06% 718.9M
Total100.00% 776.6T 100.00% 1.115T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)44.40% 495.2G
Medium (100-1400B)20.81% 232.1G
Large (1401-1500B)34.02% 379.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.77% 8.536G
Total100.00% 1.115T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.55% 749.9T 96.23% 1.073T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.60% 4.674T 0.75% 8.402G
EF [DSCP=46]0.16% 1.268T 0.11% 1.184G
Other2.68% 20.84T 2.91% 32.46G
Total100.00% 776.6T 100.00% 1.115T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.39% 3.005T 0.22% 2.505G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200003.80% 29.55T 2.62% 29.20G
200012.03% 15.80T 1.37% 15.30G
200021.18% 9.159T 0.79% 8.764G
163841.04% 8.090T 0.76% 8.483G
543210.90% 6.995T 0.43% 4.774G