Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071022

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071022 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 33.85% of octets and 15.77% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.386M 3 10.05M
5 1.470M 13 10.50M
10 1.575M 24 10.95M
50 3.005M 58 18.22M
90 11.23M 59 50.56M
95 17.75M 59 73.20M
99 45.33M 59 145.2M
99.9 132.5M 115 420.6M
99.99 887.2M 119 2.314G
99.999 1.149G 120 7.256G
100 16.80G 121 17.73G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.38% 668.9M
Medium (100-1400B)8.14% 14.24G
Large (1401-1500B)90.98% 159.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.49% 860.6M
Total100.00% 174.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers25.94% 67.36T 26.62% 46.57G 31.01% 2.868M
Encrypted Traffic9.27% 24.08T 9.65% 16.88G 8.18% 757.0k
File Sharing3.00% 7.783T 3.07% 5.364G 2.43% 224.3k
Advanced Apps2.34% 6.079T 2.40% 4.191G 3.08% 285.0k
Measurement1.65% 4.294T 0.66% 1.156G 0.15% 13.71k
Misc0.48% 1.249T 0.53% 924.5M 0.82% 75.49k
Games0.31% 800.7G 0.32% 564.0M 0.37% 33.80k
Audio/Video0.27% 702.5G 0.28% 494.1M 0.57% 52.48k
Unidentified56.73% 147.3T 56.48% 98.81G 53.40% 4.940M
Total100.00% 259.6T 100.00% 174.9G 100.00% 9.250M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
2.471G900017INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
2.384G900060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
300.2M150016Unknown [32361]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf
275.0M150019Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
213.1M150030Merit [237]NYSERNet [3756]Iperf
193.8M142059U Arizona [1706]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
161.3M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.5M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
155.9M137813NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
130.1M141016NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.046G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]54501 -> 5101
988.9M900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]50305 -> 5101
481.4M150014INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]LATECH [19564]64005 -> 50004
467.4M141125SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]SSH
453.9M878860DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
372.0M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]42580 -> 5101
256.1M150027Oregon State U [4201]UCLA [52]1218 -> 49000
251.7M150011Pennsylvania State U [3999]NASA Internet [297]20059 -> 50542
247.8M150022NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
236.0M150021NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 782.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.86% 298.0T 41.41% 459.3G
Encrypted Traffic5.78% 44.36T 5.77% 63.96G
File Sharing2.67% 20.48T 2.78% 30.79G
Misc2.12% 16.24T 4.05% 44.86G
Audio/Video1.67% 12.78T 1.42% 15.74G
Advanced Apps1.57% 12.06T 1.27% 14.10G
Measurement0.90% 6.907T 0.96% 10.64G
Games0.48% 3.720T 0.83% 9.165G
Unidentified45.94% 352.4T 41.52% 460.4G
Total100.00% 767.1T 100.00% 1.109T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
35.29%
1.45%
1.09%
1.02%
---
270.7T
11.15T
8.395T
7.806T
---
38.52%
1.25%
0.81%
0.83%
---
427.2G
13.90G
8.937G
9.245G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.47%
2.03%
0.28%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.61T
15.55T
2.120T
72.05G
7.703G
---
2.96%
2.50%
0.28%
0.01%
0.00%
---
32.86G
27.77G
3.145G
151.3M
27.65M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Neo-Modus
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
0.91%
0.69%
0.44%
0.38%
0.14%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.944T
5.298T
3.406T
2.913T
1.058T
702.0G
78.44G
39.50G
12.92G
12.16G
11.12G
4.406G
100.2M
---
0.73%
0.95%
0.30%
0.50%
0.12%
0.14%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.074G
10.52G
3.358G
5.579G
1.310G
1.559G
124.4M
62.94M
12.38M
157.1M
18.77M
5.481M
115.0k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
Telnet
IRC
NFS
MS Windows
NTP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.10%
0.32%
0.23%
0.23%
0.09%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.429T
2.481T
1.802T
1.745T
681.5G
405.1G
274.4G
122.1G
85.88G
69.24G
47.94G
39.15G
35.55G
17.69G
8.702G
805.8M
66.24M
---
1.85%
0.22%
1.30%
0.27%
0.10%
0.08%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.05%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.48G
2.471G
14.45G
2.940G
1.117G
845.2M
533.3M
456.5M
127.8M
521.8M
629.4M
61.55M
47.51M
107.0M
59.21M
3.959M
389.9k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.00%
0.59%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.635T
4.528T
409.4G
127.3G
61.66G
21.41G
3.035G
1.666G
0.000
---
0.66%
0.68%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.364G
7.591G
501.8M
167.8M
79.27M
33.10M
7.579M
4.197M
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.50%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.53T
414.4G
60.26G
38.80G
14.82G
1.161G
---
1.21%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
13.37G
450.7M
110.1M
79.81M
81.46M
1.435M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.85%
0.05%
0.00%
---
6.509T
397.7G
0.000
---
0.36%
0.60%
0.00%
---
3.999G
6.648G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.30%
0.06%
0.06%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.288T
452.2G
447.9G
337.1G
131.8G
31.35G
30.91G
---
0.33%
0.31%
0.11%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.604G
3.463G
1.206G
487.2M
272.9M
54.37M
75.57M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
45.94%
---
352.4T
---
41.52%
---
460.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
767.1T
---
100.00%
---
1.109T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 397.7G 0.60% 6.648G
IGMP[2]0.00% 44.27M 0.00% 1.208M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 24.28G 0.02% 257.6M
TCP[6]90.87% 697.0T 86.76% 962.3G
UDP[17]5.72% 43.89T 10.06% 111.5G
IPv6[41]0.00% 27.23G 0.01% 94.26M
GRE[47]3.06% 23.48T 2.23% 24.72G
ESP[50]0.28% 2.120T 0.28% 3.145G
AX.25[93]0.00% 103.2k 0.00% 2.200k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.862G 0.00% 40.12M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 84.43G 0.03% 305.7M
Total100.00% 767.1T 100.00% 1.109T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)44.59% 494.5G
Medium (100-1400B)20.52% 227.6G
Large (1401-1500B)34.62% 383.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.27% 3.006G
Total100.00% 1.109T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.21% 738.0T 96.06% 1.065T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.55% 4.232T 0.67% 7.396G
EF [DSCP=46]0.17% 1.271T 0.11% 1.191G
Other3.08% 23.58T 3.16% 35.06G
Total100.00% 767.1T 100.00% 1.109T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.37% 2.816T 0.21% 2.368G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200004.03% 30.92T 2.77% 30.68G
200012.35% 18.02T 1.56% 17.28G
200021.46% 11.23T 0.95% 10.58G
163841.05% 8.077T 0.76% 8.433G
200030.85% 6.514T 0.56% 6.259G