Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071015

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071015 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 33.84% of octets and 16.30% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.386M 4 10.05M
5 1.472M 13 10.50M
10 1.577M 23 10.95M
50 3.019M 58 18.16M
90 10.55M 59 48.30M
95 17.72M 59 67.20M
99 45.82M 59 149.1M
99.9 126.7M 117 393.1M
99.99 440.6M 119 1.767G
99.999 966.2M 123 2.508G
100 37.16G 139 3.929G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.51% 934.1M
Medium (100-1400B)6.90% 12.56G
Large (1401-1500B)92.54% 168.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.05% 86.63M
Total100.00% 182.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers26.97% 71.56T 27.17% 49.45G 31.50% 3.078M
Encrypted Traffic7.92% 21.02T 8.04% 14.64G 6.87% 671.7k
File Sharing3.12% 8.265T 3.14% 5.707G 2.44% 238.7k
Advanced Apps2.67% 7.084T 2.68% 4.883G 3.42% 333.9k
Misc0.55% 1.449T 0.57% 1.028G 0.83% 80.73k
Games0.31% 827.2G 0.32% 575.4M 0.38% 36.72k
Audio/Video0.31% 816.2G 0.31% 571.0M 0.61% 59.81k
Measurement0.30% 785.6G 0.39% 716.8M 0.11% 11.08k
Unidentified57.86% 153.4T 57.38% 104.4G 53.84% 5.262M
Total100.00% 265.3T 100.00% 182.0G 100.00% 9.773M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
726.8M150019SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
668.7M150047SDSC [195]NCSA [1224]Iperf
645.1M150010HPC-NET [1972]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf
499.8M150010CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]HPC-NET [1972]Iperf
452.9M150020Unknown [40127]SDSC [195]Iperf
356.2M150011Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]HPC-NET [1972]Iperf
332.7M150032INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]RIT [4385]Iperf
210.2M150011HPC-NET [1972]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]Iperf
166.7M150023NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
148.8M136811NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.031G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]52353 -> 5101
1.020G899410NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]Audiogalaxy
553.7M150010SDSC [195]NCSA [1224]NFS
514.7M150013INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]LATECH [19564]64002 -> 50002
462.4M142716SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]2222 -> 57300
455.5M148860DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
404.6M150018RIT [4385]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
353.3M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]51857 -> 5101
297.1M150010Harvard [11]Abilene [11537]33250 -> 3002
277.3M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 825.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.49% 301.7T 40.83% 455.8G
Encrypted Traffic5.19% 40.71T 5.33% 59.55G
File Sharing2.73% 21.36T 3.01% 33.60G
Misc2.32% 18.17T 4.26% 47.53G
Advanced Apps1.73% 13.56T 1.42% 15.87G
Audio/Video1.64% 12.87T 1.41% 15.71G
Games0.50% 3.927T 0.84% 9.377G
Measurement0.41% 3.198T 0.79% 8.830G
Unidentified46.99% 368.4T 42.11% 470.1G
Total100.00% 784.0T 100.00% 1.116T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
34.85%
1.59%
1.14%
0.91%
---
273.2T
12.46T
8.939T
7.111T
---
37.83%
1.39%
0.93%
0.67%
---
422.3G
15.57G
10.37G
7.523G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.99%
1.92%
0.27%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.47T
15.07T
2.098T
53.45G
6.884G
---
2.61%
2.43%
0.29%
0.01%
0.00%
---
29.09G
27.12G
3.189G
126.4M
26.55M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Neo-Modus
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
0.86%
0.69%
0.49%
0.45%
0.13%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.768T
5.378T
3.814T
3.509T
1.025T
691.9G
83.08G
51.87G
15.85G
12.07G
10.12G
3.209G
72.57M
---
0.71%
1.02%
0.68%
0.31%
0.12%
0.14%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.971G
11.36G
7.537G
3.477G
1.295G
1.578G
127.5M
78.83M
17.17M
21.42M
134.9M
4.279M
112.8k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
Telnet
NFS
IRC
MS Windows
NTP
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.10%
0.50%
0.24%
0.24%
0.09%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.610T
3.917T
1.882T
1.856T
732.2G
359.6G
311.0G
164.6G
128.9G
60.84G
46.88G
44.05G
28.69G
17.92G
13.10G
2.042G
165.1M
---
1.91%
0.31%
1.34%
0.27%
0.12%
0.07%
0.06%
0.02%
0.04%
0.04%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.27G
3.474G
14.90G
3.055G
1.345G
767.3M
670.1M
176.7M
471.9M
482.5M
615.0M
55.04M
51.41M
105.9M
77.67M
6.517M
546.5k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
IBP
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.61%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.63T
423.6G
340.5G
123.8G
32.60G
13.63G
---
1.32%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
14.68G
531.8M
362.4M
139.7M
73.33M
75.46M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.96%
0.59%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.549T
4.623T
457.6G
131.7G
80.94G
23.19G
3.929G
1.700G
0.000
---
0.65%
0.68%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.205G
7.638G
547.1M
173.4M
102.0M
33.42M
8.902M
4.688M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.30%
0.06%
0.06%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.351T
492.8G
448.1G
422.3G
112.1G
69.59G
30.90G
---
0.32%
0.32%
0.10%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.618G
3.623G
1.169G
552.2M
261.7M
99.58M
53.69M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.35%
0.05%
0.00%
---
2.777T
420.7G
0.000
---
0.28%
0.51%
0.00%
---
3.150G
5.680G
0.000
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.99%
---
368.4T
---
42.11%
---
470.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
784.0T
---
100.00%
---
1.116T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 420.7G 0.51% 5.680G
IGMP[2]0.00% 44.52M 0.00% 1.218M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 35.32G 0.03% 376.4M
TCP[6]89.23% 699.6T 86.79% 969.0G
UDP[17]5.92% 46.44T 10.14% 113.2G
IPv6[41]0.00% 19.77G 0.01% 94.13M
GRE[47]4.51% 35.32T 2.21% 24.66G
ESP[50]0.27% 2.098T 0.29% 3.189G
AX.25[93]0.00% 145.8k 0.00% 3.100k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.901G 0.00% 40.15M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 53.71G 0.01% 127.4M
Total100.00% 784.0T 100.00% 1.116T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.94% 490.5G
Medium (100-1400B)21.04% 234.8G
Large (1401-1500B)34.29% 382.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.73% 8.146G
Total100.00% 1.116T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.31% 755.0T 96.21% 1.074T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.51% 4.011T 0.62% 6.958G
EF [DSCP=46]0.16% 1.263T 0.10% 1.154G
Other3.02% 23.68T 3.06% 34.19G
Total100.00% 784.0T 100.00% 1.116T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.36% 2.795T 0.21% 2.363G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200003.56% 27.93T 2.56% 28.60G
200012.45% 19.17T 1.68% 18.76G
200021.63% 12.78T 1.13% 12.57G
163841.10% 8.592T 0.80% 8.940G
200030.97% 7.621T 0.70% 7.764G