Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071008

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071008 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 36.05% of octets and 18.80% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.393M 4 10.07M
5 1.495M 13 10.50M
10 1.623M 23 11.10M
50 3.311M 58 19.21M
90 11.04M 59 52.35M
95 18.60M 59 74.10M
99 48.87M 59 173.4M
99.9 135.7M 59 546.6M
99.99 490.0M 118 1.726G
99.999 850.3M 121 2.440G
100 11.67G 124 3.199G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.89% 1.396G
Medium (100-1400B)5.65% 8.883G
Large (1401-1500B)93.42% 146.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.04% 56.62M
Total100.00% 157.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers25.30% 57.76T 25.34% 39.82G 31.26% 2.407M
Encrypted Traffic6.87% 15.69T 6.89% 10.83G 6.56% 505.4k
File Sharing3.05% 6.968T 3.06% 4.810G 2.62% 201.6k
Advanced Apps3.00% 6.850T 3.00% 4.708G 4.31% 331.7k
Measurement0.51% 1.175T 0.88% 1.382G 0.18% 13.54k
Misc0.36% 813.5G 0.45% 714.4M 0.69% 53.49k
Games0.32% 727.2G 0.32% 506.3M 0.40% 30.45k
Audio/Video0.29% 663.3G 0.29% 458.8M 0.67% 51.40k
Unidentified60.30% 137.7T 59.77% 93.95G 53.32% 4.107M
Total100.00% 228.3T 100.00% 157.1G 100.00% 7.702M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
849.0M150018SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
753.1M150011SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
428.8M148525APNIC [7575]Unknown [32361]Iperf
235.1M142056LLL-TIS [45]UTAH [17055]Iperf
167.8M150018NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
156.6M150013NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
152.0M138413NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
126.0M140910NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
117.4M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
106.1M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]SLAC [3671]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
912.0M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]48690 -> 5101
542.1M150011INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]LATECH [19564]64008 -> 50002
421.2M149260APNIC [7575]Unknown [32361]59899 -> 60045
398.7M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]45448 -> 5101
382.6M150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
311.4M148016Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]HTTP
289.1M148021Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]UCB [25]HTTP
261.7M150018Oregon State U [4201]UCLA [52]1079 -> 49000
237.4M150032RIT [4385]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
220.8M149417Unknown [0]Indiana [87]HTTP

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 644.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers34.98% 221.6T 39.22% 327.8G
Encrypted Traffic4.81% 30.48T 5.49% 45.88G
File Sharing2.32% 14.68T 2.34% 19.60G
Advanced Apps2.08% 13.17T 1.72% 14.42G
Misc2.00% 12.64T 3.91% 32.72G
Audio/Video1.60% 10.11T 1.52% 12.68G
Measurement0.52% 3.286T 1.03% 8.642G
Games0.47% 2.948T 0.82% 6.827G
Unidentified51.23% 324.6T 43.94% 367.3G
Total100.00% 633.5T 100.00% 836.0G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
31.05%
1.68%
1.21%
1.04%
---
196.6T
10.66T
7.673T
6.600T
---
35.92%
1.43%
1.00%
0.87%
---
300.3G
11.96G
8.328G
7.265G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.79%
1.73%
0.28%
0.01%
0.00%
---
17.69T
10.93T
1.780T
63.98G
4.049G
---
2.76%
2.40%
0.31%
0.02%
0.00%
---
23.05G
20.03G
2.597G
180.7M
18.71M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
WinMX
FastTrack
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Blubster
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
0.92%
0.49%
0.45%
0.26%
0.11%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.832T
3.083T
2.822T
1.638T
676.1G
460.5G
66.00G
61.86G
26.45G
8.568G
7.632G
2.857G
54.82M
---
0.78%
0.62%
0.32%
0.39%
0.09%
0.12%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.480G
5.144G
2.676G
3.227G
754.4M
992.4M
89.66M
97.14M
26.56M
7.435M
102.6M
3.347M
60.20k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.97%
0.07%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.47T
463.3G
192.8G
29.35G
9.853G
5.232G
---
1.61%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
13.45G
589.8M
200.2M
69.76M
76.95M
25.01M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
Telnet
IRC
MS Windows
NFS
AOL AIM
NTP
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.98%
0.43%
0.22%
0.18%
0.09%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.197T
2.693T
1.366T
1.166T
592.1G
182.2G
166.6G
81.79G
43.65G
37.90G
34.28G
31.99G
22.39G
16.73G
8.670G
355.8M
18.98M
---
1.79%
0.28%
1.20%
0.24%
0.14%
0.05%
0.04%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.00G
2.329G
10.06G
2.031G
1.132G
428.1M
363.0M
329.7M
315.3M
73.15M
40.30M
420.7M
42.89M
93.42M
47.62M
3.012M
329.6k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.93%
0.58%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.883T
3.662T
409.5G
95.04G
40.99G
17.03G
3.754G
2.396G
0.000
---
0.72%
0.72%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.033G
5.981G
437.3M
136.2M
59.52M
24.39M
8.598M
4.413M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.47%
0.05%
0.00%
---
2.953T
332.7G
0.000
---
0.41%
0.62%
0.00%
---
3.467G
5.174G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.27%
0.06%
0.06%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.709T
365.2G
362.3G
351.6G
101.8G
34.03G
24.66G
---
0.31%
0.11%
0.05%
0.31%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
2.579G
890.8M
455.2M
2.578G
215.5M
54.72M
53.83M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
51.23%
---
324.6T
---
43.94%
---
367.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
633.5T
---
100.00%
---
836.0G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 332.7G 0.62% 5.174G
IGMP[2]0.00% 41.76M 0.00% 1.142M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 30.27G 0.04% 318.9M
TCP[6]86.34% 547.0T 85.94% 718.5G
UDP[17]5.48% 34.73T 9.67% 80.88G
IPv6[41]0.00% 10.57G 0.01% 59.27M
GRE[47]7.83% 49.61T 3.38% 28.26G
ESP[50]0.28% 1.780T 0.31% 2.597G
AX.25[93]0.00% 126.0k 0.00% 2.800k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.450G 0.00% 38.61M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 64.17G 0.02% 182.4M
Total100.00% 633.5T 100.00% 836.0G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.61% 347.8G
Medium (100-1400B)19.43% 162.4G
Large (1401-1500B)36.82% 307.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.15% 17.99G
Total100.00% 836.0G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.74% 612.9T 96.59% 807.5G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.21% 1.323T 0.45% 3.754G
EF [DSCP=46]0.20% 1.252T 0.13% 1.094G
Other2.85% 18.07T 2.83% 23.63G
Total100.00% 633.5T 100.00% 836.0G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.36% 2.291T 0.23% 1.964G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200004.83% 30.60T 3.44% 28.79G
200012.81% 17.78T 1.94% 16.21G
200021.49% 9.463T 1.03% 8.596G
200030.93% 5.900T 0.64% 5.388G
9880.90% 5.700T 0.53% 4.407G