Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071001

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071001 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 35.07% of octets and 18.65% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.390M 4 10.06M
5 1.477M 13 10.50M
10 1.579M 22 10.95M
50 3.309M 58 18.74M
90 11.00M 59 51.90M
95 19.18M 59 72.89M
99 47.67M 59 166.5M
99.9 112.9M 59 544.8M
99.99 454.9M 59 971.4M
99.999 857.2M 129 1.729G
100 19.93G 130 5.390G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.73% 1.109G
Medium (100-1400B)5.16% 7.868G
Large (1401-1500B)93.97% 143.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.14% 209.4M
Total100.00% 152.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers24.71% 54.98T 24.72% 37.67G 29.25% 2.230M
Encrypted Traffic6.36% 14.15T 5.93% 9.041G 5.90% 449.6k
File Sharing3.28% 7.293T 3.34% 5.087G 2.66% 202.8k
Advanced Apps3.14% 6.995T 3.15% 4.801G 4.42% 337.1k
Measurement0.53% 1.175T 0.62% 938.6M 0.25% 18.96k
Misc0.44% 983.5G 0.81% 1.241G 0.81% 61.84k
Games0.38% 852.5G 0.39% 595.3M 0.47% 35.59k
Audio/Video0.27% 601.7G 0.28% 420.1M 0.59% 45.06k
Unidentified60.87% 135.4T 60.76% 92.60G 55.66% 4.243M
Total100.00% 222.4T 100.00% 152.4G 100.00% 7.625M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
885.0M150012SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
715.0M150020SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
563.9M150010SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf
450.2M150060INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
307.3M150017Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
165.0M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
156.2M150014NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
145.6M137117NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
122.9M140627NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
88.52M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
942.0M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]44695 -> 5101
827.7M150012INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]63002 -> 42364
724.4M150060INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Brookhaven National Lab [43]39685 -> 20000
612.5M150037U Chicago [160]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]37826 -> 63001
498.7M150013INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]LATECH [19564]64043 -> 50002
453.8M150010Utah Education Net [210]Microsoft London IDC [8075]HTTP
440.1M150039UCLA [52]Oregon State U [4201]49000 -> 1303
378.4M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]50516 -> 5101
329.5M146818Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]HTTP
315.8M150011Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 634.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers32.92% 208.8T 38.77% 316.8G
Encrypted Traffic4.37% 27.71T 4.92% 40.19G
File Sharing2.35% 14.88T 2.37% 19.38G
Advanced Apps2.14% 13.55T 1.84% 15.00G
Audio/Video2.10% 13.32T 2.05% 16.76G
Misc1.79% 11.36T 3.96% 32.39G
Measurement0.50% 3.164T 0.95% 7.766G
Games0.47% 3.011T 0.87% 7.071G
Unidentified53.37% 338.5T 44.27% 361.7G
Total100.00% 634.3T 100.00% 817.1G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
28.94%
1.69%
1.24%
1.05%
---
183.5T
10.72T
7.860T
6.657T
---
35.41%
1.37%
1.04%
0.95%
---
289.3G
11.19G
8.500G
7.774G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.49%
1.64%
0.23%
0.01%
0.00%
---
15.78T
10.39T
1.470T
50.17G
5.211G
---
2.30%
2.35%
0.26%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.77G
19.18G
2.129G
91.57M
19.73M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
0.96%
0.47%
0.47%
0.26%
0.10%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.086T
2.977T
2.952T
1.623T
647.7G
482.5G
55.00G
43.43G
7.575G
5.789G
2.892G
2.684G
366.8M
---
0.80%
0.35%
0.60%
0.38%
0.09%
0.13%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.547G
2.822G
4.867G
3.098G
730.0M
1.055G
87.00M
63.07M
100.4M
8.216M
3.868M
2.968M
310.8k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
2.04%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.92T
502.3G
61.12G
40.36G
16.12G
11.03G
---
1.67%
0.07%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
13.66G
537.4M
601.4M
85.69M
49.81M
70.59M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.44%
0.58%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.116T
3.696T
349.0G
98.69G
39.02G
16.72G
6.713G
986.6M
12.00k
---
1.22%
0.75%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.995G
6.159G
388.5M
129.8M
59.66M
23.75M
8.606M
2.095M
300.0
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
Telnet
IRC
MS Windows
NFS
NTP
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
IDENT
RTIP
---
0.95%
0.27%
0.20%
0.15%
0.10%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.020T
1.736T
1.238T
974.4G
638.7G
279.1G
179.2G
88.40G
54.61G
41.02G
31.38G
27.00G
22.36G
15.81G
9.606G
8.051G
119.2M
---
1.82%
0.21%
1.21%
0.23%
0.18%
0.07%
0.05%
0.04%
0.08%
0.01%
0.05%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
14.90G
1.688G
9.855G
1.841G
1.506G
533.0M
379.3M
356.0M
617.5M
71.93M
412.6M
35.63M
42.87M
88.79M
9.384M
46.58M
421.7k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.45%
0.05%
0.00%
---
2.844T
319.7G
0.000
---
0.36%
0.59%
0.00%
---
2.919G
4.847G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.27%
0.07%
0.06%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.690T
423.9G
383.1G
338.0G
87.15G
71.73G
16.25G
---
0.31%
0.07%
0.11%
0.31%
0.02%
0.04%
0.00%
---
2.521G
534.6M
908.2M
2.533G
183.9M
359.6M
30.20M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
53.37%
---
338.5T
---
44.27%
---
361.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
634.3T
---
100.00%
---
817.1G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 319.7G 0.59% 4.847G
IGMP[2]0.00% 40.18M 0.00% 1.131M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 21.79G 0.03% 235.1M
TCP[6]83.93% 532.3T 85.16% 695.9G
UDP[17]5.88% 37.32T 10.14% 82.83G
IPv6[41]0.00% 13.00G 0.01% 68.06M
GRE[47]9.89% 62.75T 3.79% 30.99G
ESP[50]0.23% 1.470T 0.26% 2.129G
AX.25[93]0.00% 130.5k 0.00% 2.900k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.454G 0.00% 39.31M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 50.32G 0.01% 92.59M
Total100.00% 634.3T 100.00% 817.1G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.04% 335.3G
Medium (100-1400B)19.44% 158.8G
Large (1401-1500B)36.81% 300.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.70% 22.04G
Total100.00% 817.1G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.94% 614.9T 96.77% 790.7G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.21% 1.322T 0.47% 3.843G
EF [DSCP=46]0.20% 1.251T 0.13% 1.097G
Other2.66% 16.85T 2.63% 21.48G
Total100.00% 634.3T 100.00% 817.1G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.38% 2.435T 0.26% 2.085G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200007.68% 48.70T 5.03% 41.08G
200013.03% 19.20T 2.09% 17.08G
200021.49% 9.467T 1.04% 8.464G
200030.94% 5.946T 0.63% 5.108G
400000.74% 4.714T 0.52% 4.252G