Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070924

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070924 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 32.77% of octets and 18.01% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.390M 4 10.08M
5 1.488M 14 10.50M
10 1.607M 23 11.10M
50 3.272M 58 19.17M
90 11.14M 59 51.90M
95 16.81M 59 73.50M
99 43.90M 59 137.2M
99.9 110.5M 104 398.1M
99.99 514.4M 119 1.036G
99.999 1.019G 126 3.724G
100 165.6G 137 26.49G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.39% 670.5M
Medium (100-1400B)5.36% 9.224G
Large (1401-1500B)94.13% 162.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.13% 216.1M
Total100.00% 172.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers24.12% 60.88T 24.25% 41.75G 28.10% 2.479M
Encrypted Traffic6.08% 15.33T 6.13% 10.55G 5.64% 498.0k
File Sharing3.68% 9.278T 3.71% 6.385G 3.02% 266.2k
Advanced Apps3.19% 8.061T 3.21% 5.533G 4.30% 379.6k
Measurement1.61% 4.060T 1.33% 2.294G 0.23% 20.13k
Misc0.50% 1.263T 0.56% 967.5M 0.77% 68.27k
Audio/Video0.30% 749.9G 0.30% 521.3M 0.65% 57.12k
Games0.28% 700.0G 0.28% 488.2M 0.32% 28.27k
Unidentified60.25% 152.0T 60.22% 103.6G 56.96% 5.026M
Total100.00% 252.4T 100.00% 172.1G 100.00% 8.824M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.735G150010INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]U Chicago [160]Iperf
1.729G150042U Chicago [160]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.075G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
671.5M133518SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]Iperf
531.9M150060PUNET Technology Ltd.,Taiwan [9270]PUNET Technology Ltd.,Taiwan [10052]Iperf
240.8M150059Merit [237]SDSC [195]Iperf
207.1M150024NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
159.4M150019NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
149.0M150010RIT [4385]WiscNet [2381]Iperf
145.2M137915NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.581G900059Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]APAN-JP [7660]50740 -> 40001
925.8M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]38929 -> 5101
361.2M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]44879 -> 5101
360.2M150041SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]54670 -> 2236
333.3M900039Argonne [683]TACCNET [32093]37050 -> 50000
294.7M150014NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
257.2M150012Oregon State U [4201]UCLA [52]1069 -> 49000
256.9M150021ONENET [5078]NYSERNet [3754]Shoutcast
237.1M150049UCLA [52]Oregon State U [4201]49000 -> 1360
225.6M150029Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]SSH

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 740.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers29.00% 223.3T 35.35% 337.9G
Encrypted Traffic4.51% 34.72T 5.82% 55.63G
File Sharing2.38% 18.33T 2.54% 24.26G
Advanced Apps1.89% 14.58T 1.72% 16.45G
Audio/Video1.81% 13.95T 1.76% 16.86G
Misc1.55% 11.92T 3.55% 33.91G
Measurement0.85% 6.581T 1.03% 9.830G
Games0.41% 3.123T 0.89% 8.474G
Unidentified57.60% 443.5T 47.34% 452.5G
Total100.00% 770.1T 100.00% 955.8G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
25.42%
1.79%
0.91%
0.88%
---
195.7T
13.78T
7.046T
6.756T
---
32.26%
1.51%
0.84%
0.73%
---
308.3G
14.45G
8.043G
7.022G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.26%
2.03%
0.22%
0.01%
0.00%
---
17.36T
15.61T
1.682T
57.18G
5.771G
---
2.27%
3.26%
0.27%
0.01%
0.00%
---
21.70G
31.20G
2.587G
118.2M
21.68M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
WinMX
FastTrack
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
1.00%
0.51%
0.45%
0.23%
0.10%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.715T
3.892T
3.465T
1.735T
800.7G
597.2G
54.85G
54.49G
8.433G
8.295G
4.582G
1.604G
2.459M
---
0.87%
0.69%
0.36%
0.36%
0.10%
0.14%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.318G
6.579G
3.409G
3.428G
937.4M
1.299G
76.47M
89.51M
12.37M
103.4M
3.949M
2.301M
21.50k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.81%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.92T
462.8G
145.2G
45.18G
12.13G
1.784G
---
1.58%
0.05%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
15.08G
483.8M
717.8M
101.9M
65.76M
2.159M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.18%
0.55%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.108T
4.241T
406.8G
123.8G
53.80G
18.78G
5.130G
933.3M
0.000
---
0.96%
0.72%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.207G
6.910G
485.1M
149.8M
70.37M
27.42M
8.620M
2.624M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
IRC
Telnet
NFS
MS Windows
NTP
AOL AIM
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.82%
0.20%
0.18%
0.16%
0.07%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.339T
1.556T
1.348T
1.223T
551.3G
489.0G
90.20G
88.10G
57.33G
53.89G
41.25G
31.48G
19.54G
19.45G
13.21G
312.8M
34.82M
---
1.58%
0.17%
1.15%
0.22%
0.10%
0.08%
0.04%
0.05%
0.01%
0.06%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.09G
1.611G
11.02G
2.129G
988.5M
792.4M
351.1M
502.5M
92.58M
541.2M
541.6M
44.74M
38.69M
63.28M
89.97M
3.163M
424.5k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.81%
0.04%
0.00%
---
6.248T
333.2G
2.152M
---
0.47%
0.56%
0.00%
---
4.452G
5.377G
29.90k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Asheron
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.23%
0.05%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.798T
364.6G
345.4G
342.9G
165.5G
83.38G
22.93G
---
0.29%
0.10%
0.04%
0.27%
0.15%
0.02%
0.00%
---
2.810G
942.3M
428.4M
2.616G
1.426G
205.7M
43.77M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
57.60%
---
443.5T
---
47.34%
---
452.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
770.1T
---
100.00%
---
955.8G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 333.2G 0.56% 5.377G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.08M 0.00% 1.183M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 12.07G 0.01% 124.4M
TCP[6]76.75% 591.1T 82.78% 791.2G
UDP[17]5.45% 41.96T 10.20% 97.52G
IPv6[41]0.00% 17.71G 0.01% 86.41M
GRE[47]17.52% 134.9T 6.15% 58.74G
ESP[50]0.22% 1.682T 0.27% 2.587G
AX.25[93]0.00% 1.425M 0.00% 7.500k
PIM[103]0.00% 11.16G 0.01% 68.88M
IPMP[169]0.00% 2.152M 0.00% 29.90k
Other0.01% 57.84G 0.01% 122.8M
Total100.00% 770.1T 100.00% 955.8G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.16% 393.4G
Medium (100-1400B)19.15% 183.0G
Large (1401-1500B)35.02% 334.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)4.67% 44.63G
Total100.00% 955.8G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.28% 749.2T 96.64% 923.7G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.41% 3.167T 0.63% 5.992G
EF [DSCP=46]0.15% 1.193T 0.10% 990.7M
Other2.15% 16.58T 2.63% 25.09G
Total100.00% 770.1T 100.00% 955.8G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.45% 3.500T 0.30% 2.830G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200004.46% 34.35T 3.71% 35.47G
200013.08% 23.69T 2.39% 22.83G
200022.06% 15.88T 1.62% 15.52G
200031.52% 11.73T 1.19% 11.35G
200041.06% 8.162T 0.83% 7.939G