Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070903

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070903 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Monday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 31.41% of octets and 14.60% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.391M 4 10.05M
5 1.489M 11 10.50M
10 1.615M 20 11.07M
50 2.919M 58 17.75M
90 9.619M 59 41.55M
95 15.01M 59 55.95M
99 38.60M 59 119.1M
99.9 120.8M 59 356.5M
99.99 994.8M 84 3.059G
99.999 1.063G 119 3.757G
100 201.6G 139 3.870G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.69% 996.3M
Medium (100-1400B)7.73% 11.15G
Large (1401-1500B)91.17% 131.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.41% 592.1M
Total100.00% 144.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers28.90% 61.25T 29.26% 42.19G 30.88% 2.631M
Encrypted Traffic7.68% 16.28T 7.81% 11.26G 6.19% 527.3k
Advanced Apps4.69% 9.936T 4.74% 6.834G 5.43% 462.9k
File Sharing3.21% 6.798T 3.27% 4.719G 2.74% 233.6k
Measurement2.92% 6.186T 1.29% 1.865G 0.20% 17.30k
Misc0.82% 1.728T 1.11% 1.601G 0.73% 62.36k
Games0.35% 743.8G 0.37% 530.3M 0.41% 34.89k
Audio/Video0.32% 670.3G 0.32% 465.1M 0.59% 50.40k
Unidentified51.13% 108.3T 51.83% 74.74G 52.83% 4.502M
Total100.00% 212.0T 100.00% 144.2G 100.00% 8.523M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.109G900012Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
866.1M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
842.2M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
810.8M150011Abilene [11537]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]Iperf
502.4M150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
490.4M141820UCLA [52]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
330.7M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
323.4M149910Abilene [11537]SDSC [195]Iperf
266.7M150020NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf
224.9M150014EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
927.9M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]56489 -> 5101
504.3M150010UCLA [52]APAN-JP [7660]40164 -> 5040
418.5M148042SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]56807 -> 22221
390.8M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]53838 -> 5101
258.3M900016NCSA [1224]TACCNET [32093]48539 -> 50000
256.6M150013Oregon State U [4201]UCLA [52]1152 -> 49000
245.9M150022Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
209.4M141960PSC-NCNE [5050]Harvard [1742]Shoutcast
203.6M150059UCLA [52]Oregon State U [4201]49000 -> 1238
195.8M150010OSU [159]Abilene [11537]61173 -> 3002

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 707.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers34.99% 236.2T 36.16% 357.1G
Encrypted Traffic6.44% 43.45T 7.83% 77.34G
Advanced Apps2.66% 17.97T 2.00% 19.80G
File Sharing2.50% 16.90T 2.47% 24.36G
Audio/Video2.44% 16.49T 2.04% 20.18G
Misc2.11% 14.27T 4.24% 41.85G
Measurement1.68% 11.35T 2.08% 20.55G
Games0.47% 3.194T 0.77% 7.616G
Unidentified46.69% 315.1T 42.41% 418.8G
Total100.00% 675.0T 100.00% 987.7G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
NNTP
Rsync
---
31.19%
1.50%
1.30%
1.01%
---
210.5T
10.14T
8.744T
6.806T
---
32.99%
1.19%
1.15%
0.82%
---
325.8G
11.76G
11.39G
8.108G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.29%
2.80%
0.33%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.23T
18.92T
2.207T
81.63G
5.556G
---
5.00%
2.49%
0.32%
0.01%
0.00%
---
49.43G
24.58G
3.152G
145.0M
25.58M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
2.42%
0.13%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
16.36T
858.8G
650.7G
44.84G
38.71G
13.53G
---
1.82%
0.08%
0.08%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
---
17.97G
755.1M
817.4M
47.94M
93.43M
116.1M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
0.92%
0.66%
0.39%
0.27%
0.14%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.228T
4.452T
2.631T
1.821T
955.1G
685.9G
65.04G
39.74G
16.61G
6.470G
2.396G
2.336G
36.10M
---
0.80%
0.75%
0.28%
0.31%
0.11%
0.17%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.950G
7.418G
2.765G
3.024G
1.114G
1.698G
109.2M
61.92M
200.0M
12.30M
2.672M
3.112M
38.85k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.61%
0.74%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.89T
4.980T
405.6G
110.3G
80.78G
19.47G
2.343G
952.7M
0.000
---
1.16%
0.80%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.44G
7.940G
510.7M
144.0M
98.27M
34.74M
6.049M
3.668M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
AFS
NFS
IRC
Telnet
NTP
MS Windows
SOCKS
RTIP
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.18%
0.26%
0.25%
0.20%
0.08%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.991T
1.765T
1.665T
1.358T
553.1G
379.9G
146.2G
97.88G
68.83G
52.89G
50.32G
41.24G
37.28G
33.50G
21.32G
8.710G
308.9M
---
1.87%
0.30%
1.44%
0.15%
0.09%
0.08%
0.02%
0.04%
0.06%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.03%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.51G
2.950G
14.23G
1.466G
876.2M
833.8M
163.0M
414.7M
639.4M
686.1M
501.2M
68.29M
328.3M
45.41M
59.88M
59.99M
4.651M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.55%
0.15%
0.00%
---
10.48T
1.018T
4.449M
---
0.53%
1.81%
0.00%
---
5.261G
17.84G
61.79k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.29%
0.06%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.952T
396.8G
356.1G
320.5G
108.9G
34.52G
25.62G
---
0.32%
0.11%
0.04%
0.26%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.147G
1.047G
441.2M
2.602G
234.8M
96.18M
47.53M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.69%
---
315.1T
---
42.41%
---
418.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
675.0T
---
100.00%
---
987.7G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.15% 1.018T 1.81% 17.84G
IGMP[2]0.00% 54.58M 0.00% 1.316M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.16% 1.088T 0.08% 837.2M
TCP[6]85.36% 576.2T 83.16% 821.3G
UDP[17]6.47% 43.68T 9.81% 96.89G
IPv6[41]0.01% 39.43G 0.02% 160.5M
GRE[47]7.40% 49.95T 4.91% 48.50G
ESP[50]0.33% 2.207T 0.32% 3.152G
AX.25[93]0.00% 314.7k 0.00% 7.116k
PIM[103]0.00% 28.03G 0.01% 122.5M
IPMP[169]0.00% 4.449M 0.00% 61.79k
Other0.14% 971.8G 0.14% 1.373G
Total100.00% 675.0T 100.00% 987.7G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)45.33% 447.7G
Medium (100-1400B)20.16% 199.1G
Large (1401-1500B)34.41% 339.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.11% 1.048G
Total100.00% 987.7G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.63% 645.5T 95.50% 943.2G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.58% 3.925T 0.70% 6.887G
EF [DSCP=46]0.08% 523.4G 0.05% 530.6M
Other3.71% 25.06T 3.75% 37.07G
Total100.00% 675.0T 100.00% 987.7G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.69% 4.658T 0.50% 4.952G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200002.12% 14.31T 1.80% 17.79G
200011.56% 10.54T 1.22% 12.08G
163841.21% 8.165T 0.85% 8.399G
200021.06% 7.155T 0.82% 8.093G
200030.76% 5.148T 0.58% 5.777G