Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070827

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070827 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/2 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.80% of octets and 19.28% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.387M 4 10.05M
5 1.478M 11 10.50M
10 1.594M 19 11.07M
50 3.328M 58 18.75M
90 12.32M 59 54.81M
95 18.82M 59 78.45M
99 45.75M 59 178.9M
99.9 118.2M 59 387.0M
99.99 990.8M 118 3.464G
99.999 1.040G 119 3.756G
100 1.905G 119 3.858G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.65% 1.033G
Medium (100-1400B)5.79% 9.150G
Large (1401-1500B)93.18% 147.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.37% 591.2M
Total100.00% 157.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers24.07% 56.40T 24.51% 38.72G 29.77% 2.335M
Encrypted Traffic8.64% 20.24T 8.85% 13.98G 7.16% 561.6k
Advanced Apps4.58% 10.72T 4.65% 7.352G 6.26% 490.9k
File Sharing3.54% 8.301T 3.66% 5.781G 2.73% 213.8k
Measurement3.51% 8.229T 2.15% 3.396G 0.53% 41.77k
Misc0.73% 1.707T 0.89% 1.413G 0.90% 70.30k
Games0.37% 871.4G 0.38% 603.0M 0.46% 35.96k
Audio/Video0.28% 647.7G 0.28% 447.9M 0.63% 49.51k
Unidentified54.28% 127.2T 54.61% 86.28G 51.56% 4.043M
Total100.00% 234.3T 100.00% 157.9G 100.00% 7.843M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.067G900017Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
895.0M150014SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
247.4M150028NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf
180.0M150029EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
164.6M150020NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
134.5M136529NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
108.4M150016NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
105.7M150010Abilene [11537]UNIVHAWAII [6360]Iperf
92.24M150018NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
88.70M150016NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
913.3M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]54678 -> 5101
364.8M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]47265 -> 5101
255.2M150027Oregon State U [4201]UCLA [52]1074 -> 49000
195.5M150015NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
191.3M147929NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
179.7M150011Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
176.8M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]UCAR [194]Hotline
164.4M142015NASA Internet [297]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
163.3M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
161.8M150019Unknown [36375]UCLA [52]1215 -> 49002

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 643.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers31.80% 192.0T 33.92% 277.8G
Encrypted Traffic6.57% 39.66T 7.44% 60.98G
Advanced Apps3.11% 18.77T 2.56% 20.98G
File Sharing2.60% 15.68T 2.53% 20.71G
Audio/Video2.29% 13.83T 2.07% 16.97G
Misc2.12% 12.79T 4.91% 40.22G
Measurement2.09% 12.61T 2.10% 17.22G
Games0.45% 2.736T 0.79% 6.462G
Unidentified48.98% 295.8T 43.67% 357.7G
Total100.00% 604.0T 100.00% 819.2G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
27.53%
1.65%
1.37%
1.25%
---
166.2T
9.937T
8.255T
7.563T
---
30.13%
1.38%
1.18%
1.23%
---
246.8G
11.28G
9.679G
10.07G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.66%
2.56%
0.30%
0.04%
0.00%
---
22.09T
15.46T
1.836T
263.5G
4.392G
---
3.25%
3.83%
0.32%
0.04%
0.00%
---
26.65G
31.36G
2.592G
350.9M
22.34M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
2.89%
0.18%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.45T
1.072T
151.2G
61.72G
21.86G
11.57G
---
2.35%
0.16%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
---
19.26G
1.291G
145.5M
143.8M
24.18M
112.4M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
WinMX
FastTrack
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.10%
0.54%
0.51%
0.24%
0.11%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.640T
3.245T
3.076T
1.442T
684.1G
473.1G
58.86G
48.61G
11.61G
4.598G
1.885G
127.1M
108.1M
---
0.93%
0.41%
0.62%
0.29%
0.10%
0.14%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.586G
3.398G
5.065G
2.348G
807.4M
1.179G
95.83M
90.59M
133.7M
8.762M
3.136M
1.055M
78.75k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.52%
0.65%
0.09%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.203T
3.927T
518.5G
105.8G
59.99G
11.58G
1.664G
1.522G
0.000
---
1.25%
0.73%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.21G
5.988G
567.4M
114.7M
69.44M
18.52M
2.582M
4.548M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
AFS
IRC
NFS
MS Windows
Telnet
NTP
AOL AIM
RTIP
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.18%
0.28%
0.27%
0.19%
0.07%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.152T
1.698T
1.614T
1.138T
440.1G
220.4G
164.4G
70.89G
70.09G
52.18G
48.07G
45.67G
33.45G
18.34G
17.99G
9.373G
577.4M
---
1.98%
0.34%
1.95%
0.14%
0.08%
0.06%
0.05%
0.01%
0.09%
0.06%
0.08%
0.01%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
16.18G
2.779G
15.99G
1.145G
692.4M
495.1M
441.7M
112.5M
745.0M
487.8M
630.1M
56.49M
302.3M
41.98M
53.85M
61.61M
4.531M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.00%
0.31%
0.00%
---
12.07T
1.872T
9.172M
---
0.86%
4.36%
0.00%
---
7.013G
35.74G
127.4k
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.23%
0.11%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.412T
650.0G
298.0G
253.6G
91.69G
16.32G
14.65G
---
0.28%
0.10%
0.11%
0.27%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.330G
792.3M
880.4M
2.200G
181.0M
52.13M
26.13M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
48.98%
---
295.8T
---
43.67%
---
357.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
604.0T
---
100.00%
---
819.2G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.31% 1.872T 4.36% 35.74G
IGMP[2]0.00% 48.92M 0.00% 1.393M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.14% 830.9G 0.08% 657.9M
TCP[6]84.12% 508.1T 81.87% 670.7G
UDP[17]5.60% 33.80T 10.31% 84.42G
IPv6[41]0.01% 34.46G 0.01% 78.00M
GRE[47]9.49% 57.32T 5.92% 48.52G
ESP[50]0.30% 1.836T 0.32% 2.592G
AX.25[93]0.00% 394.1k 0.00% 5.600k
PIM[103]0.00% 16.85G 0.01% 86.24M
IPMP[169]0.00% 9.172M 0.00% 127.4k
Other0.25% 1.519T 0.23% 1.921G
Total100.00% 604.0T 100.00% 819.2G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.53% 348.3G
Medium (100-1400B)18.77% 153.8G
Large (1401-1500B)38.19% 312.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.51% 4.181G
Total100.00% 819.2G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.76% 578.4T 95.86% 785.2G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.29% 1.770T 0.29% 2.398G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 28.31G 0.02% 142.1M
Other3.94% 23.81T 3.83% 31.41G
Total100.00% 604.0T 100.00% 819.2G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.66% 3.959T 0.54% 4.424G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200000.97% 5.859T 0.67% 5.524G
200010.67% 4.053T 0.50% 4.071G
200020.44% 2.675T 0.35% 2.831G
400000.40% 2.388T 0.24% 1.966G
400010.33% 1.999T 0.20% 1.660G