Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070820

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070820 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Tuesday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.10% of octets and 19.05% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 4 10.07M
5 1.495M 12 10.50M
10 1.621M 19 11.10M
50 3.104M 58 18.15M
90 12.16M 59 51.60M
95 17.65M 59 74.25M
99 48.63M 59 158.1M
99.9 120.0M 59 391.9M
99.99 994.6M 113 3.539G
99.999 1.057G 119 3.767G
100 5.082G 120 5.552G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.64% 1.090G
Medium (100-1400B)5.55% 9.419G
Large (1401-1500B)93.39% 158.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.42% 719.0M
Total100.00% 169.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers22.96% 58.18T 23.80% 40.41G 26.37% 2.337M
Encrypted Traffic6.50% 16.47T 6.77% 11.48G 5.81% 515.2k
Advanced Apps4.43% 11.21T 4.52% 7.668G 5.52% 489.5k
Measurement4.28% 10.83T 2.63% 4.458G 0.56% 49.86k
File Sharing3.44% 8.708T 3.52% 5.969G 3.01% 266.8k
Misc0.43% 1.092T 0.47% 801.1M 0.74% 65.60k
Games0.23% 573.1G 0.23% 396.7M 0.26% 23.01k
Audio/Video0.21% 537.9G 0.22% 378.5M 0.47% 41.96k
Unidentified57.52% 145.7T 57.84% 98.21G 57.25% 5.075M
Total100.00% 253.3T 100.00% 169.7G 100.00% 8.865M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.090G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.040G900011ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.036G900026Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
891.0M150013SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
754.4M128134SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]Iperf
297.4M900012Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
248.3M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
246.6M150030NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf
241.2M150012EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
173.6M150011NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
903.1M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]51812 -> 5101
400.0M149822SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]60722 -> 22223
369.9M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]37185 -> 5101
300.1M150013APNIC [7575]SURFnet [1103]57770 -> 2630
258.1M148959Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]COMMERCEONE [13371]HTTP
244.8M150012U Notre Dame [693]UCLA [52]2158 -> 49004
240.1M142019Indiana [87]Unknown [40127]Rsync
232.1M142060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]UTAH [17055]HTTP
207.9M150015Indiana [87]RIT [4385]Rsync
204.6M150022Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 725.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers30.11% 200.2T 32.06% 285.8G
Encrypted Traffic5.45% 36.26T 6.35% 56.58G
Advanced Apps2.90% 19.26T 2.44% 21.70G
Audio/Video2.50% 16.61T 2.19% 19.56G
File Sharing2.48% 16.49T 2.39% 21.34G
Measurement2.28% 15.17T 2.11% 18.82G
Misc2.02% 13.44T 5.99% 53.41G
Games0.37% 2.450T 0.86% 7.663G
Unidentified51.89% 345.0T 45.60% 406.5G
Total100.00% 664.9T 100.00% 891.4G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
25.55%
1.85%
1.58%
1.13%
---
169.8T
12.29T
10.53T
7.537T
---
28.12%
1.49%
1.35%
1.10%
---
250.6G
13.31G
12.02G
9.787G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.78%
2.28%
0.38%
0.02%
0.00%
---
18.46T
15.15T
2.518T
115.3G
5.522G
---
2.58%
3.38%
0.37%
0.02%
0.00%
---
22.96G
30.11G
3.296G
184.5M
24.53M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.73%
0.11%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.17T
741.3G
281.6G
33.40G
24.48G
8.804G
---
2.27%
0.10%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
20.20G
933.8M
350.5M
75.63M
133.4M
9.195M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.78%
0.64%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.83T
4.280T
372.5G
68.67G
47.84G
13.39G
1.959G
483.3M
0.000
---
1.39%
0.73%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.39G
6.542G
454.0M
89.35M
62.72M
17.23M
4.795M
1.473M
0.000
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.09%
0.50%
0.45%
0.25%
0.12%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.228T
3.335T
2.973T
1.638T
773.8G
407.6G
66.67G
36.54G
12.87G
9.464G
5.016G
2.567G
7.327M
---
0.99%
0.39%
0.47%
0.30%
0.10%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.850G
3.490G
4.221G
2.709G
901.3M
837.1M
105.1M
63.32M
146.9M
11.29M
4.890M
3.151M
13.06k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.20%
0.10%
0.00%
---
14.60T
663.9G
3.743M
---
0.94%
1.37%
0.00%
---
8.379G
12.19G
51.99k
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
X11
AFS
Telnet
IRC
MS Windows
NTP
NFS
RTIP
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.10%
0.27%
0.23%
0.22%
0.07%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.324T
1.800T
1.528T
1.481T
491.9G
318.7G
141.1G
115.8G
50.58G
50.52G
44.26G
44.09G
18.30G
18.23G
9.478G
7.043G
292.7M
---
1.86%
0.34%
1.90%
1.41%
0.09%
0.08%
0.06%
0.04%
0.05%
0.07%
0.01%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.55G
3.039G
16.95G
12.59G
830.2M
673.7M
570.4M
388.6M
487.0M
662.4M
87.33M
396.8M
55.25M
34.96M
62.65M
11.61M
3.941M
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.22%
0.07%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.445T
469.8G
231.0G
191.4G
87.93G
13.07G
11.79G
---
0.26%
0.35%
0.04%
0.18%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.335G
3.124G
313.2M
1.634G
196.9M
38.36M
20.30M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
51.89%
---
345.0T
---
45.60%
---
406.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
664.9T
---
100.00%
---
891.4G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.10% 663.9G 1.37% 12.19G
IGMP[2]0.00% 50.73M 0.00% 1.396M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.11% 710.9G 0.07% 604.5M
TCP[6]81.02% 538.8T 79.44% 708.1G
UDP[17]5.25% 34.94T 10.53% 93.86G
IPv6[41]0.00% 21.10G 0.00% 39.37M
GRE[47]12.94% 86.06T 8.22% 73.27G
ESP[50]0.38% 2.518T 0.37% 3.296G
AX.25[93]0.00% 229.2k 0.00% 5.600k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.478G 0.00% 34.53M
IPMP[169]0.00% 3.743M 0.00% 51.99k
Other0.21% 1.363T 0.20% 1.746G
Total100.00% 664.9T 100.00% 891.4G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.45% 387.3G
Medium (100-1400B)16.67% 148.6G
Large (1401-1500B)39.02% 347.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.86% 7.675G
Total100.00% 891.4G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.87% 637.5T 96.12% 856.8G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.20% 1.302T 0.19% 1.710G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 28.75G 0.02% 145.9M
Other3.93% 26.14T 3.67% 32.73G
Total100.00% 664.9T 100.00% 891.4G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.80% 5.308T 0.65% 5.810G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200003.05% 20.27T 2.65% 23.61G
200012.21% 14.69T 1.81% 16.13G
200021.60% 10.61T 1.27% 11.36G
200031.04% 6.918T 0.86% 7.656G
200040.71% 4.736T 0.62% 5.564G