Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070813

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070813 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/2 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 50.81% of octets and 27.04% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.352M 4 10.08M
5 1.489M 10 10.65M
10 1.639M 17 11.25M
50 3.754M 58 19.95M
90 15.80M 59 64.50M
95 26.75M 59 98.70M
99 65.47M 117 248.5M
99.9 125.1M 119 508.9M
99.99 1.004G 120 3.554G
99.999 1.089G 126 3.785G
100 237.6G 128 3.942G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.48% 856.8M
Medium (100-1400B)4.49% 7.981G
Large (1401-1500B)94.56% 168.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.47% 836.9M
Total100.00% 177.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers17.42% 46.57T 18.18% 32.33G 25.20% 1.927M
Encrypted Traffic7.30% 19.51T 7.60% 13.51G 7.69% 588.2k
Measurement3.71% 9.930T 1.92% 3.412G 0.50% 38.37k
Advanced Apps3.31% 8.859T 3.40% 6.050G 5.29% 404.8k
File Sharing2.91% 7.791T 2.99% 5.324G 2.58% 197.5k
Misc0.34% 919.1G 0.37% 659.4M 0.79% 60.74k
Audio/Video0.22% 584.5G 0.23% 407.3M 0.60% 46.18k
Games0.09% 248.8G 0.10% 174.1M 0.15% 11.77k
Unidentified64.69% 172.9T 65.22% 116.0G 57.17% 4.371M
Total100.00% 267.4T 100.00% 177.9G 100.00% 7.646M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.069G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.050G900030ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.043G900016Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.031G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
845.8M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
484.3M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
348.6M150013CERN [513]U Florida [6356]Iperf
313.7M900010Abilene [11537]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Iperf
291.0M900014APNIC [7575]SURFnet [1103]Iperf
243.4M150023NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
875.7M900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]54598 -> 5101
558.4M900010Abilene [11537]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]43140 -> 5101
276.5M900060APNIC [7575]SURFnet [1103]40248 -> 2630
208.1M147229Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]UCLA [52]HTTP
206.3M149931Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
202.1M150052DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
197.6M150056RIT [4385]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
193.5M147324NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
191.6M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
178.1M150018NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]UCAR [194]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 621.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers31.36% 165.0T 36.40% 239.4G
Encrypted Traffic7.03% 36.97T 8.26% 54.31G
Advanced Apps3.11% 16.35T 2.83% 18.59G
Audio/Video2.99% 15.73T 2.66% 17.48G
File Sharing2.62% 13.79T 2.45% 16.13G
Measurement2.50% 13.13T 1.77% 11.67G
Misc2.35% 12.38T 5.34% 35.16G
Games0.31% 1.627T 0.50% 3.314G
Unidentified47.74% 251.2T 39.79% 261.7G
Total100.00% 526.2T 100.00% 657.9G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
26.80%
1.84%
1.57%
1.15%
---
141.0T
9.703T
8.275T
6.038T
---
31.91%
1.85%
1.46%
1.18%
---
209.9G
12.17G
9.575G
7.791G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.19%
2.44%
0.38%
0.02%
0.00%
---
22.06T
12.81T
1.980T
109.2G
6.894G
---
4.24%
3.54%
0.44%
0.03%
0.00%
---
27.88G
23.29G
2.915G
179.8M
28.24M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
BBCP
IBP
---
2.92%
0.17%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.39T
914.1G
29.26G
7.644G
7.503G
148.8M
---
2.62%
0.16%
0.01%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
17.26G
1.081G
54.95M
101.1M
94.72M
724.5k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
2.07%
0.81%
0.10%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.87T
4.237T
539.7G
51.22G
25.19G
8.697G
1.572G
612.4M
18.03M
---
1.57%
0.97%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.34G
6.387G
627.2M
66.41M
35.13M
12.78M
2.223M
1.218M
13.30k
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.04%
0.64%
0.41%
0.35%
0.10%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.452T
3.381T
2.154T
1.862T
552.0G
273.7G
59.61G
36.87G
14.75G
3.807G
1.901G
136.7M
505.7k
---
0.81%
0.51%
0.48%
0.44%
0.10%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.346G
3.358G
3.166G
2.870G
663.3M
515.0M
88.02M
65.24M
14.85M
42.76M
1.763M
209.3k
10.15k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.41%
0.30%
0.00%
---
12.68T
1.584T
9.613M
---
0.99%
2.73%
0.00%
---
6.542G
17.95G
133.5k
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
AFS
X11
NFS
IRC
NTP
Telnet
MS Windows
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.45%
0.31%
0.26%
0.12%
0.09%
0.06%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.645T
1.640T
1.352T
611.1G
459.0G
307.5G
125.0G
116.8G
45.53G
33.49G
29.69G
9.397G
7.923G
3.364G
971.7M
374.0M
18.33M
---
2.65%
0.39%
1.71%
0.09%
0.13%
0.08%
0.02%
0.05%
0.09%
0.05%
0.04%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.46G
2.536G
11.27G
620.7M
868.5M
558.1M
162.4M
342.4M
598.0M
358.0M
257.7M
22.53M
56.71M
38.15M
2.923M
5.661M
424.9k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.22%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.163T
316.7G
72.03G
46.61G
18.00G
5.504G
5.122G
---
0.28%
0.09%
0.08%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.864G
605.0M
524.7M
253.0M
46.40M
9.006M
11.72M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
47.74%
---
251.2T
---
39.79%
---
261.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
526.2T
---
100.00%
---
657.9G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.30% 1.584T 2.73% 17.95G
IGMP[2]0.00% 41.86M 0.00% 1.170M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 9.200G 0.02% 111.0M
TCP[6]93.94% 494.3T 89.80% 590.7G
UDP[17]4.75% 25.00T 8.06% 53.04G
IPv6[41]0.00% 13.66G 0.00% 19.42M
GRE[47]0.70% 3.708T 0.75% 4.923G
ESP[50]0.38% 1.980T 0.44% 2.915G
AX.25[93]0.00% 219.4k 0.00% 5.250k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.001G 0.00% 28.55M
IPMP[169]0.00% 9.613M 0.00% 133.5k
Other0.14% 731.4G 0.15% 956.2M
Total100.00% 526.2T 100.00% 657.9G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.62% 260.6G
Medium (100-1400B)17.25% 113.4G
Large (1401-1500B)42.98% 282.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.15% 976.1M
Total100.00% 657.9G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.36% 501.8T 95.68% 629.4G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.21% 1.115T 0.24% 1.577G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 34.01G 0.02% 159.9M
Other4.42% 23.24T 4.06% 26.70G
Total100.00% 526.2T 100.00% 657.9G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.50% 2.618T 0.41% 2.701G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200003.42% 17.99T 2.03% 13.34G
200012.03% 10.70T 1.26% 8.298G
200021.12% 5.903T 0.73% 4.809G
200030.73% 3.818T 0.49% 3.208G
200040.48% 2.549T 0.33% 2.145G