Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070730

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070730 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Thursday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 35.28% of octets and 18.81% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.384M 3 10.05M
5 1.480M 11 10.50M
10 1.594M 18 10.95M
50 3.301M 58 18.30M
90 11.22M 59 48.90M
95 17.02M 59 66.75M
99 46.17M 59 125.8M
99.9 139.7M 119 421.5M
99.99 1.010G 119 3.661G
99.999 1.087G 144 3.787G
100 5.063G 145 3.923G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.68% 908.6M
Medium (100-1400B)5.52% 7.399G
Large (1401-1500B)93.07% 124.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.73% 982.9M
Total100.00% 134.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers20.61% 41.89T 21.63% 28.99G 23.69% 1.750M
Encrypted Traffic9.12% 18.53T 9.59% 12.85G 7.70% 568.7k
Advanced Apps5.67% 11.51T 5.85% 7.834G 6.62% 489.2k
Measurement5.55% 11.27T 2.48% 3.321G 0.48% 35.14k
File Sharing4.11% 8.361T 4.27% 5.719G 3.45% 254.9k
Misc0.51% 1.029T 0.55% 732.5M 0.71% 52.28k
Audio/Video0.30% 610.4G 0.32% 431.8M 0.66% 48.53k
Games0.14% 294.2G 0.15% 204.9M 0.18% 13.44k
Unidentified53.99% 109.7T 55.16% 73.93G 56.52% 4.176M
Total100.00% 203.2T 100.00% 134.0G 100.00% 7.390M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.080G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.071G900011Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.062G900012ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.045G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
868.0M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
664.9M150012Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf
400.8M150010Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
391.0M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
358.3M150012CERN [513]U Florida [6356]Iperf
309.9M150015Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
310.2M150030TACCNET [32093]PSC [1207]Audiogalaxy
293.9M150014Unknown [25776]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]63002 -> 38648
251.6M150011Indiana [87]U Chicago [160]36355 -> 57127
212.3M150060APNIC [7575]SURFnet [1103]Shoutcast
202.6M150038Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
199.5M147212NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
198.6M150015NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
194.8M150012Unknown [0]Indiana [87]HTTP
193.1M150030PSC [1207]TACCNET [32093]50010 -> 48176
178.5M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]UCAR [194]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 599.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers24.95% 143.7T 27.79% 198.0G
Encrypted Traffic6.58% 37.90T 15.43% 109.9G
Advanced Apps3.27% 18.85T 2.89% 20.57G
Audio/Video3.06% 17.64T 2.88% 20.51G
Measurement2.90% 16.72T 2.28% 16.26G
File Sharing2.45% 14.09T 2.31% 16.49G
Misc1.83% 10.51T 4.06% 28.92G
Games0.26% 1.512T 0.44% 3.106G
Unidentified54.70% 315.1T 41.92% 298.7G
Total100.00% 576.1T 100.00% 712.5G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
20.95%
1.50%
1.33%
1.16%
---
120.7T
8.662T
7.659T
6.684T
---
23.93%
1.49%
1.14%
1.24%
---
170.4G
10.60G
8.091G
8.827G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.51%
1.69%
0.37%
0.02%
0.00%
---
25.97T
9.710T
2.126T
97.97G
3.504G
---
12.58%
2.41%
0.42%
0.02%
0.00%
---
89.62G
17.15G
3.003G
154.6M
16.85M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
3.00%
0.16%
0.10%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.25T
897.1G
603.4G
53.85G
24.89G
12.84G
---
2.62%
0.16%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
18.70G
1.106G
593.7M
41.58M
58.38M
68.78M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Single-Source Multicast
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
---
2.35%
0.60%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.55T
3.429T
561.4G
42.94G
41.63G
9.445G
1.409G
866.3M
257.7M
---
2.09%
0.67%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.90G
4.781G
693.4M
55.93M
61.62M
13.46M
1.039M
3.029M
1.039M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.79%
0.14%
0.00%
---
16.05T
782.9G
3.459M
---
0.99%
1.51%
0.00%
---
7.061G
10.73G
48.04k
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.17%
0.59%
0.31%
0.25%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.766T
3.402T
1.767T
1.436T
496.8G
164.4G
33.89G
14.25G
3.269G
2.302G
2.078G
840.2M
57.84M
---
1.00%
0.50%
0.35%
0.31%
0.09%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.091G
3.565G
2.526G
2.227G
630.2M
333.1M
54.02M
28.91M
4.314M
25.71M
2.225M
755.7k
966.2k
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
AFS
X11
NFS
IRC
NTP
MS Windows
Telnet
SOCKS
IDENT
AOL AIM
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.00%
0.29%
0.20%
0.11%
0.08%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.786T
1.670T
1.172T
612.7G
478.2G
325.9G
194.5G
118.1G
40.48G
38.38G
34.78G
16.18G
11.14G
8.021G
6.923G
734.3M
36.18M
---
1.79%
0.38%
1.34%
0.08%
0.13%
0.08%
0.03%
0.05%
0.07%
0.04%
0.05%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.75G
2.708G
9.525G
605.5M
897.9M
602.2M
242.3M
325.9M
531.8M
252.6M
342.1M
24.76M
38.72M
13.72M
51.00M
13.33M
543.0k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.18%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.037T
307.2G
67.65G
46.19G
41.85G
6.828G
5.681G
---
0.22%
0.12%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.593G
887.9M
463.6M
66.60M
68.12M
9.901M
17.05M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
54.70%
---
315.1T
---
41.92%
---
298.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
576.1T
---
100.00%
---
712.5G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.14% 782.9G 1.51% 10.73G
IGMP[2]0.00% 50.28M 0.00% 1.399M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.03% 182.6G 0.05% 347.2M
TCP[6]72.63% 418.3T 80.41% 572.9G
UDP[17]13.35% 76.93T 8.97% 63.89G
IPv6[41]0.00% 25.07G 0.00% 31.59M
GRE[47]13.26% 76.41T 8.61% 61.38G
ESP[50]0.37% 2.126T 0.42% 3.003G
AX.25[93]0.00% 23.10k 0.00% 350.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.376G 0.00% 33.77M
IPMP[169]0.00% 3.459M 0.00% 48.04k
Other0.23% 1.352T 0.24% 1.717G
Total100.00% 576.1T 100.00% 712.5G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)44.22% 315.0G
Medium (100-1400B)15.88% 113.1G
Large (1401-1500B)38.50% 274.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.40% 9.964G
Total100.00% 712.5G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.80% 546.1T 91.48% 651.8G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.32% 1.835T 0.31% 2.207G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 23.08G 0.02% 113.0M
Other4.88% 28.09T 8.19% 58.38G
Total100.00% 576.1T 100.00% 712.5G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.76% 4.389T 0.67% 4.753G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
30003.47% 19.98T 0.35% 2.471G
30013.47% 19.98T 0.35% 2.502G
10523.45% 19.86T 0.34% 2.457G
10513.44% 19.84T 0.34% 2.445G
200003.40% 19.60T 2.48% 17.65G