Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070716

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070716 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/4 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 34.35% of octets and 21.13% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.378M 4 10.05M
5 1.468M 12 10.50M
10 1.578M 20 10.95M
50 3.353M 58 19.05M
90 12.00M 59 56.55M
95 16.83M 59 76.05M
99 42.39M 59 134.4M
99.9 170.1M 119 609.4M
99.99 1.013G 119 3.676G
99.999 1.101G 121 3.789G
100 165.6G 124 5.940G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.06% 1.455G
Medium (100-1400B)4.44% 6.099G
Large (1401-1500B)93.69% 128.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.81% 1.118G
Total100.00% 137.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers19.68% 41.00T 20.55% 28.24G 25.94% 1.807M
Encrypted Traffic10.06% 20.96T 10.62% 14.59G 8.38% 583.4k
Measurement6.17% 12.85T 3.48% 4.780G 0.49% 34.34k
Advanced Apps4.40% 9.159T 4.53% 6.225G 6.17% 429.7k
File Sharing3.49% 7.281T 3.62% 4.979G 2.81% 195.4k
Misc0.35% 720.7G 0.38% 517.3M 0.63% 43.98k
Audio/Video0.29% 594.3G 0.30% 413.5M 0.67% 46.97k
Games0.11% 230.4G 0.12% 163.0M 0.15% 10.36k
Unidentified55.46% 115.5T 56.40% 77.51G 54.76% 3.814M
Total100.00% 208.3T 100.00% 137.4G 100.00% 6.966M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.072G900014Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.067G900011Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.058G900029ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.041G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.020G900013DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
884.6M150017SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
652.8M150012Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf
490.9M900056INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
378.3M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
327.5M142060LLL-TIS [45]UTAH [17055]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
541.8M150038APNIC [7575]SURFnet [1103]46419 -> 52100
424.0M895858DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]988 -> 1023
266.5M150060Unknown [25776]PSC [1207]SSH
203.1M147812NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
201.0M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
177.2M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
175.3M150040Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
169.3M150028NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]UCAR [194]Hotline
169.3M150012Indiana [87]RIT [4385]Rsync
151.1M900019High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]TACCNET [32093]SSH

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 571.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers22.54% 136.7T 28.38% 184.5G
Encrypted Traffic5.59% 33.94T 7.05% 45.86G
Audio/Video3.81% 23.13T 3.74% 24.30G
Advanced Apps2.71% 16.41T 2.88% 18.72G
Measurement2.66% 16.10T 2.37% 15.40G
File Sharing2.09% 12.69T 2.50% 16.23G
Misc1.60% 9.731T 3.91% 25.44G
Games0.22% 1.358T 0.41% 2.677G
Unidentified58.77% 356.6T 48.77% 317.1G
Total100.00% 606.7T 100.00% 650.4G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
18.24%
1.93%
1.30%
1.07%
---
110.6T
11.73T
7.882T
6.495T
---
23.64%
2.09%
1.52%
1.12%
---
153.7G
13.61G
9.898G
7.285G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.71%
1.59%
0.27%
0.02%
0.00%
---
22.52T
9.650T
1.639T
123.6G
3.188G
---
4.09%
2.56%
0.37%
0.03%
0.00%
---
26.60G
16.62G
2.431G
181.6M
15.47M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
3.24%
0.48%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.64T
2.916T
467.4G
54.00G
38.14G
8.515G
1.267G
1.204G
0.000
---
3.01%
0.62%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.60G
4.063G
492.7M
70.02M
51.85M
11.74M
4.083M
2.760M
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
2.54%
0.13%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.41T
789.8G
165.2G
25.18G
24.23G
314.7M
---
2.67%
0.15%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
17.34G
991.7M
265.7M
68.45M
53.98M
1.309M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.56%
0.17%
0.00%
---
15.53T
1.008T
5.292M
---
1.07%
2.28%
0.00%
---
6.948G
14.80G
73.50k
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
0.91%
0.54%
0.31%
0.20%
0.09%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.509T
3.286T
1.896T
1.220T
545.0G
190.1G
25.83G
12.87G
3.359G
2.629G
2.114G
1.565G
294.7k
---
1.05%
0.52%
0.45%
0.30%
0.10%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.822G
3.388G
2.910G
1.944G
639.8M
428.6M
44.74M
18.23M
5.701M
26.00M
3.085M
1.612M
6.125k
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
X11
AFS
IRC
Telnet
NTP
MS Windows
NFS
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.84%
0.24%
0.18%
0.16%
0.07%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.099T
1.456T
1.091T
999.9G
403.9G
393.8G
115.8G
42.04G
41.74G
34.02G
22.88G
9.702G
7.171G
6.988G
5.483G
510.2M
338.6M
---
1.72%
0.38%
0.15%
1.19%
0.11%
0.11%
0.04%
0.05%
0.08%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.16G
2.462G
946.4M
7.747G
706.3M
741.7M
283.6M
347.1M
544.9M
333.7M
38.94M
19.06M
15.05M
52.33M
29.46M
3.243M
1.020M
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.17%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.002T
219.4G
74.98G
34.83G
15.30G
6.030G
5.313G
---
0.24%
0.07%
0.08%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.546G
487.1M
517.8M
64.79M
27.16M
22.02M
11.63M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
58.77%
---
356.6T
---
48.77%
---
317.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
606.7T
---
100.00%
---
650.4G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.17% 1.008T 2.28% 14.80G
IGMP[2]0.00% 52.72M 0.00% 1.492M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 59.51G 0.05% 300.0M
TCP[6]65.98% 400.3T 77.67% 505.1G
UDP[17]22.40% 135.9T 11.38% 74.03G
IPv6[41]0.00% 14.98G 0.00% 22.13M
GRE[47]11.12% 67.45T 9.07% 58.99G
ESP[50]0.27% 1.639T 0.37% 2.431G
AX.25[93]0.00% 38.85k 0.00% 875.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.499G 0.01% 34.41M
IPMP[169]0.00% 5.292M 0.00% 73.50k
Other0.12% 751.8G 0.15% 971.0M
Total100.00% 606.7T 100.00% 650.4G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.38% 256.1G
Medium (100-1400B)18.53% 120.5G
Large (1401-1500B)39.53% 257.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.57% 16.70G
Total100.00% 650.4G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.65% 580.3T 95.16% 618.9G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.23% 1.400T 0.34% 2.221G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 15.39G 0.01% 81.62M
Other4.11% 24.95T 4.48% 29.14G
Total100.00% 606.7T 100.00% 650.4G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.76% 4.618T 0.83% 5.399G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
30014.71% 28.59T 0.55% 3.574G
30004.71% 28.59T 0.54% 3.530G
10524.68% 28.39T 0.54% 3.494G
10514.68% 28.38T 0.54% 3.493G
200001.30% 7.888T 1.30% 8.441G