Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070625

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070625 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/4 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 44.60% of octets and 23.74% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.370M 3 10.05M
5 1.457M 13 10.47M
10 1.569M 21 10.95M
50 3.269M 58 19.20M
90 10.56M 59 51.60M
95 14.72M 59 68.85M
99 51.09M 59 123.1M
99.9 366.3M 119 519.9M
99.99 1.021G 120 3.707G
99.999 1.384G 122 3.791G
100 230.4G 122 3.867G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.63% 925.9M
Medium (100-1400B)3.87% 5.670G
Large (1401-1500B)94.35% 138.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.15% 1.679G
Total100.00% 146.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers20.08% 45.62T 21.37% 31.32G 24.70% 1.950M
Encrypted Traffic8.16% 18.53T 8.81% 12.91G 7.66% 604.9k
Measurement7.65% 17.38T 2.66% 3.899G 0.43% 33.92k
Advanced Apps4.37% 9.929T 4.58% 6.707G 5.94% 468.9k
File Sharing3.85% 8.744T 4.07% 5.969G 3.29% 259.6k
Misc0.47% 1.059T 0.55% 799.4M 0.42% 33.50k
Audio/Video0.19% 423.1G 0.20% 293.3M 0.42% 33.15k
Games0.14% 311.2G 0.15% 218.2M 0.15% 11.84k
Unidentified55.10% 125.2T 57.62% 84.47G 56.99% 4.499M
Total100.00% 227.2T 100.00% 146.6G 100.00% 7.895M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.131G900027Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.070G900012ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.054G900018Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.037G899410High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
892.8M150010SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
663.6M150013Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf
377.8M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
320.1M149719Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
259.6M150010EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
234.0M150020Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
685.2M150011INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]Audiogalaxy
246.9M150027NCSA [1224]Unknown [27274]IRC
240.8M149130NASA-GSFC [1749]UMDNET [27]HTTP
233.3M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
197.0M150015NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
174.4M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
152.4M900027High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]TACCNET [32093]SSH
151.0M150013Indiana [87]Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Rsync
144.8M149922Virginia Tech [1312]U Minnesota [217]17694 -> 51798
137.2M142012NASA Internet [297]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 654.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers26.82% 136.6T 28.30% 174.7G
Encrypted Traffic6.10% 31.08T 7.26% 44.84G
Measurement4.47% 22.76T 1.76% 10.87G
Advanced Apps3.49% 17.76T 3.27% 20.21G
File Sharing2.91% 14.80T 2.82% 17.41G
Audio/Video2.39% 12.17T 2.31% 14.23G
Misc1.72% 8.748T 3.80% 23.43G
Games0.30% 1.551T 0.45% 2.789G
Unidentified51.81% 263.9T 50.03% 308.9G
Total100.00% 509.4T 100.00% 617.4G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
20.59%
2.84%
1.93%
1.46%
---
104.9T
14.46T
9.822T
7.425T
---
22.90%
2.29%
1.89%
1.22%
---
141.4G
14.15G
11.69G
7.523G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.18%
1.61%
0.29%
0.02%
0.00%
---
21.30T
8.202T
1.465T
101.7G
3.128G
---
4.56%
2.33%
0.34%
0.03%
0.00%
---
28.16G
14.39G
2.100G
170.5M
16.19M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
4.41%
0.11%
0.00%
---
22.45T
542.7G
5.115M
---
1.14%
1.08%
0.00%
---
7.050G
6.685G
71.05k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
3.23%
0.18%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.47T
922.6G
297.8G
35.01G
23.93G
5.621G
---
3.01%
0.18%
0.07%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
---
18.58G
1.090G
405.9M
30.35M
48.21M
55.98M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.38%
0.69%
0.39%
0.31%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.025T
3.524T
2.000T
1.573T
500.0G
122.2G
33.53G
12.35G
5.076G
2.925G
1.556G
31.57M
319.0k
---
1.22%
0.57%
0.48%
0.39%
0.10%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.513G
3.542G
2.942G
2.404G
625.6M
275.0M
50.47M
15.74M
7.202M
31.46M
1.676M
158.7k
5.775k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.80%
0.53%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.152T
2.687T
265.3G
33.81G
24.33G
12.87G
1.273G
460.1M
0.000
---
1.64%
0.60%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.10G
3.726G
297.7M
41.85M
39.20M
16.28M
3.873M
1.242M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
IRC
X11
Port 0
AFS
NTP
Telnet
NFS
MS Windows
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.90%
0.29%
0.19%
0.13%
0.07%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.584T
1.486T
992.5G
651.8G
336.0G
287.6G
225.4G
42.54G
37.44G
37.22G
31.21G
17.00G
9.696G
5.738G
2.988G
652.9M
30.40M
---
1.62%
0.41%
1.17%
0.12%
0.09%
0.06%
0.09%
0.09%
0.05%
0.01%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.00G
2.509G
7.251G
723.0M
528.1M
390.4M
547.0M
558.2M
309.5M
51.10M
398.9M
65.35M
38.58M
43.09M
5.948M
13.90M
641.5k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.23%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.168T
259.5G
62.03G
39.22G
9.315G
6.164G
6.159G
---
0.28%
0.08%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.710G
514.5M
439.8M
77.38M
15.93M
23.46M
8.500M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
51.81%
---
263.9T
---
50.03%
---
308.9G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
509.4T
---
100.00%
---
617.4G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.11% 542.7G 1.08% 6.685G
IGMP[2]0.00% 53.40M 0.00% 1.505M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 41.13G 0.06% 350.6M
TCP[6]83.84% 427.1T 82.84% 511.5G
UDP[17]5.65% 28.76T 8.56% 52.87G
IPv6[41]0.00% 19.92G 0.00% 27.61M
GRE[47]10.14% 51.63T 7.55% 46.59G
ESP[50]0.29% 1.465T 0.34% 2.100G
AX.25[93]0.00% 304.5k 0.00% 7.175k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.956G 0.01% 39.66M
IPMP[169]0.00% 5.115M 0.00% 71.05k
Other0.02% 103.7G 0.03% 182.1M
Total100.00% 509.4T 100.00% 617.4G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.31% 236.5G
Medium (100-1400B)17.69% 109.2G
Large (1401-1500B)43.53% 268.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.47% 2.899G
Total100.00% 617.4G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.15% 484.7T 95.43% 589.2G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.18% 937.4G 0.25% 1.547G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 20.54G 0.02% 108.5M
Other4.66% 23.76T 4.30% 26.55G
Total100.00% 509.4T 100.00% 617.4G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.82% 4.164T 0.75% 4.624G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200002.16% 10.98T 2.34% 14.47G
200011.33% 6.774T 1.44% 8.884G
400001.19% 6.070T 0.94% 5.820G
400011.14% 5.830T 0.89% 5.467G
400020.89% 4.547T 0.68% 4.221G