Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070611

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070611 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 29.13% of octets and 20.44% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.373M 4 10.05M
5 1.455M 12 10.36M
10 1.553M 19 10.93M
50 3.237M 58 18.03M
90 11.35M 59 54.15M
95 15.98M 59 71.85M
99 39.00M 59 116.0M
99.9 392.7M 119 553.6M
99.99 1.021G 120 3.708G
99.999 1.158G 124 3.795G
100 259.2G 124 5.605G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.81% 1.138G
Medium (100-1400B)4.59% 6.454G
Large (1401-1500B)93.26% 131.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.34% 1.891G
Total100.00% 140.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers24.41% 53.45T 26.05% 36.67G 30.01% 2.272M
Measurement8.87% 19.41T 3.12% 4.396G 0.51% 38.67k
Encrypted Traffic8.16% 17.86T 8.86% 12.46G 7.09% 536.9k
Advanced Apps3.33% 7.293T 3.51% 4.946G 4.84% 366.6k
File Sharing3.30% 7.230T 3.54% 4.984G 2.77% 209.5k
Misc0.32% 701.2G 0.36% 510.2M 0.62% 46.75k
Audio/Video0.19% 405.2G 0.21% 290.0M 0.41% 30.90k
Games0.13% 274.4G 0.14% 192.4M 0.17% 12.57k
Unidentified51.30% 112.3T 54.21% 76.31G 53.59% 4.058M
Total100.00% 218.9T 100.00% 140.7G 100.00% 7.572M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.097G900024Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.086G900014Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.056G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.039G900012ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
940.1M900022Unknown [0]Abilene [11537]Iperf
880.5M150011SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
851.9M150048UCLA [52]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
714.9M150010Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf
389.3M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
367.2M149710Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
416.8M150011NCSA [1224]Unknown [25776]51892 -> 60000
234.5M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
197.6M150011RIT [4385]MIT [3]3003 -> 35144
197.4M150026NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
185.9M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
180.7M147810NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
175.2M149960Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]U Buffalo [3685]HTTP
159.2M125960APNIC [7575]SURFnet [1103]52459 -> 52100
158.1M150027Unknown [0]Indiana [87]Spy Arcade
154.4M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Stanford [32]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 620.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers21.50% 161.6T 30.21% 208.0G
Encrypted Traffic4.23% 31.78T 6.29% 43.32G
Measurement3.38% 25.40T 1.51% 10.39G
Advanced Apps1.98% 14.90T 2.59% 17.83G
File Sharing1.77% 13.28T 2.34% 16.13G
Audio/Video1.61% 12.07T 2.05% 14.09G
Misc1.26% 9.458T 3.72% 25.63G
Games0.23% 1.716T 0.45% 3.067G
Unidentified64.05% 481.4T 50.85% 350.2G
Total100.00% 751.7T 100.00% 688.8G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
16.38%
2.81%
1.34%
0.97%
---
123.1T
21.13T
10.04T
7.272T
---
24.25%
2.99%
1.76%
1.20%
---
167.0G
20.61G
12.14G
8.300G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.73%
1.27%
0.21%
0.02%
0.00%
---
20.51T
9.561T
1.581T
133.6G
2.723G
---
3.53%
2.39%
0.34%
0.03%
0.00%
---
24.28G
16.46G
2.372G
190.2M
13.40M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
3.34%
0.04%
0.00%
---
25.13T
267.3G
4.730M
---
1.09%
0.42%
0.00%
---
7.479G
2.918G
65.70k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.80%
0.11%
0.07%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.55T
795.0G
526.1G
22.14G
4.290G
1.212G
---
2.31%
0.14%
0.13%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
15.88G
942.6M
915.4M
52.58M
44.12M
1.370M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.80%
0.41%
0.23%
0.22%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.997T
3.061T
1.747T
1.686T
602.8G
116.0G
46.43G
10.61G
8.894G
3.381G
1.319G
1.224G
4.681M
---
0.94%
0.45%
0.38%
0.39%
0.11%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.476G
3.129G
2.642G
2.720G
734.6M
269.4M
88.36M
17.43M
10.98M
37.94M
1.397M
1.181M
12.90k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.08%
0.47%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.145T
3.547T
280.1G
47.01G
43.35G
9.297G
2.066G
924.7M
0.000
---
1.28%
0.69%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.825G
4.744G
378.6M
65.15M
59.94M
14.90M
4.249M
1.784M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
AFS
IRC
MS Windows
NFS
Telnet
NTP
IDENT
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.69%
0.18%
0.15%
0.10%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.194T
1.380T
1.132T
766.0G
389.2G
296.4G
87.63G
50.65G
42.25G
41.17G
37.08G
16.03G
13.52G
6.309G
5.069G
184.7M
20.66M
---
1.55%
0.36%
1.27%
0.11%
0.09%
0.08%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.05%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.68G
2.452G
8.734G
725.0M
632.9M
581.4M
462.3M
324.7M
63.06M
339.8M
486.4M
45.18M
48.78M
10.73M
39.74M
2.850M
476.8k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.16%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.203T
345.3G
65.24G
45.14G
42.18G
7.278G
7.236G
---
0.25%
0.10%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.735G
699.9M
453.5M
64.15M
76.16M
27.25M
10.65M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
64.05%
---
481.4T
---
50.85%
---
350.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
751.7T
---
100.00%
---
688.8G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 267.3G 0.42% 2.918G
IGMP[2]0.00% 54.42M 0.00% 1.518M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.04% 320.6G 0.06% 394.9M
TCP[6]58.98% 443.3T 76.02% 523.6G
UDP[17]3.78% 28.38T 7.31% 50.35G
IPv6[41]0.00% 6.880G 0.00% 15.59M
GRE[47]36.94% 277.6T 15.77% 108.6G
ESP[50]0.21% 1.581T 0.34% 2.372G
AX.25[93]0.00% 349.7k 0.00% 7.600k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.092G 0.01% 42.81M
IPMP[169]0.00% 4.730M 0.00% 65.70k
Other0.02% 153.4G 0.06% 431.4M
Total100.00% 751.7T 100.00% 688.8G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)33.70% 232.1G
Medium (100-1400B)15.18% 104.5G
Large (1401-1500B)36.64% 252.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)14.48% 99.73G
Total100.00% 688.8G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.20% 723.1T 95.28% 656.2G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.16% 1.168T 0.23% 1.571G
EF [DSCP=46]0.02% 186.7G 0.03% 206.9M
Other3.62% 27.19T 4.46% 30.72G
Total100.00% 751.7T 100.00% 688.8G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.52% 3.926T 0.54% 3.727G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200002.68% 20.15T 2.90% 19.96G
400011.53% 11.51T 1.55% 10.66G
400001.49% 11.18T 1.49% 10.24G
200011.35% 10.17T 1.47% 10.14G
21280.78% 5.843T 1.02% 7.058G