Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070604

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070604 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 43.63% of octets and 23.77% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.381M 4 10.05M
5 1.468M 13 10.50M
10 1.573M 21 10.95M
50 3.214M 58 18.45M
90 10.82M 59 52.65M
95 14.69M 59 71.25M
99 42.71M 59 126.1M
99.9 951.5M 118 1.091G
99.99 1.028G 119 3.729G
99.999 1.195G 127 3.815G
100 259.2G 128 7.342G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.97% 1.408G
Medium (100-1400B)4.19% 6.069G
Large (1401-1500B)93.17% 134.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.66% 2.400G
Total100.00% 144.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers24.51% 56.06T 26.59% 38.48G 29.44% 2.269M
Measurement10.75% 24.57T 3.84% 5.550G 0.53% 40.96k
Encrypted Traffic7.89% 18.04T 8.52% 12.32G 7.30% 562.4k
File Sharing3.72% 8.511T 4.07% 5.889G 3.03% 233.9k
Advanced Apps3.65% 8.353T 3.92% 5.667G 5.28% 406.8k
Misc0.31% 711.1G 0.36% 513.8M 0.53% 40.90k
Audio/Video0.25% 561.7G 0.27% 389.7M 0.57% 44.05k
Games0.12% 280.5G 0.14% 197.1M 0.17% 13.07k
Unidentified48.80% 111.6T 52.31% 75.69G 53.15% 4.097M
Total100.00% 228.7T 100.00% 144.7G 100.00% 7.709M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.074G900012Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.065G900010Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.046G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.032G900015ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
996.6M900010ORNL [50]Abilene [11537]Iperf
962.3M150032DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
875.8M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
693.6M150013Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf
592.8M150060INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
497.7M142060LLL-TIS [45]UTAH [17055]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
506.7M150011APAN-JP [7660]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]36501 -> 48689
392.3M150016UCLA [52]Oregon State U [4201]49000 -> 1717
372.2M141511SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]SSH
343.4M149914DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1020 -> 988
314.9M150017NCSA [1224]Unknown [25776]42606 -> 60000
207.9M150040Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
207.3M149922Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]HTTP
200.3M150019NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
199.7M149952NCSA [1224]SDSC [195]34808 -> 5150
194.6M149925INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]988 -> 1021

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 636.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers30.66% 160.7T 34.05% 207.3G
Measurement5.98% 31.34T 1.89% 11.49G
Encrypted Traffic5.94% 31.11T 6.90% 41.98G
File Sharing3.02% 15.81T 3.00% 18.26G
Advanced Apps2.95% 15.48T 2.92% 17.80G
Audio/Video2.58% 13.54T 2.38% 14.46G
Misc1.70% 8.934T 3.87% 23.54G
Games0.33% 1.723T 0.53% 3.221G
Unidentified46.84% 245.5T 44.47% 270.7G
Total100.00% 524.1T 100.00% 608.8G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
22.69%
4.53%
1.98%
1.46%
---
118.9T
23.73T
10.37T
7.651T
---
26.99%
3.69%
2.02%
1.36%
---
164.3G
22.44G
12.28G
8.263G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
5.93%
0.05%
0.00%
---
31.07T
272.0G
4.262M
---
1.40%
0.48%
0.00%
---
8.540G
2.950G
59.20k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.94%
1.64%
0.34%
0.02%
0.00%
---
20.64T
8.585T
1.786T
101.2G
2.476G
---
4.03%
2.46%
0.38%
0.03%
0.00%
---
24.55G
14.94G
2.299G
167.1M
12.95M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.46%
0.54%
0.51%
0.34%
0.13%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.664T
2.835T
2.653T
1.765T
678.1G
150.6G
41.75G
11.20G
5.426G
3.977G
1.050G
134.9M
9.946M
---
1.23%
0.49%
0.61%
0.46%
0.13%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.474G
2.953G
3.723G
2.778G
820.0M
377.2M
73.53M
15.32M
7.254M
42.60M
1.167M
484.1k
15.10k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.71%
0.15%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.19T
774.0G
462.0G
26.78G
25.97G
175.6M
---
2.61%
0.15%
0.14%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
15.90G
932.0M
853.5M
58.20M
59.63M
353.8k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.86%
0.63%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.749T
3.292T
396.2G
58.94G
32.07G
9.583G
2.481G
1.099G
448.5M
---
1.54%
0.74%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.356G
4.504G
461.3M
73.60M
46.37M
13.52M
5.761M
2.288M
330.8k
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
AFS
X11
IRC
Telnet
NTP
NFS
MS Windows
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.93%
0.28%
0.21%
0.10%
0.07%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.875T
1.461T
1.076T
548.3G
381.3G
320.0G
85.38G
40.27G
33.73G
29.52G
29.34G
22.30G
17.09G
9.104G
4.559G
94.50M
32.79M
---
1.65%
0.42%
1.22%
0.10%
0.11%
0.09%
0.06%
0.06%
0.07%
0.01%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.02G
2.565G
7.436G
581.8M
662.3M
540.3M
388.2M
343.1M
442.3M
48.05M
331.0M
33.57M
69.97M
32.58M
36.17M
1.182M
442.6k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.24%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.242T
310.0G
74.12G
37.97G
36.09G
13.44G
9.787G
---
0.29%
0.11%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
1.793G
646.6M
587.6M
68.04M
63.86M
22.23M
39.83M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.84%
---
245.5T
---
44.47%
---
270.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
524.1T
---
100.00%
---
608.8G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 272.0G 0.48% 2.950G
IGMP[2]0.00% 54.13M 0.00% 1.527M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.07% 345.7G 0.06% 366.6M
TCP[6]86.54% 453.6T 84.89% 516.8G
UDP[17]5.97% 31.27T 8.38% 51.03G
IPv6[41]0.00% 896.2M 0.00% 6.816M
GRE[47]7.01% 36.76T 5.72% 34.81G
ESP[50]0.34% 1.786T 0.38% 2.299G
AX.25[93]0.00% 275.8k 0.00% 6.500k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.060G 0.01% 44.02M
IPMP[169]0.00% 4.262M 0.00% 59.20k
Other0.02% 125.9G 0.07% 456.4M
Total100.00% 524.1T 100.00% 608.8G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)36.64% 223.0G
Medium (100-1400B)18.94% 115.3G
Large (1401-1500B)43.29% 263.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.13% 6.901G
Total100.00% 608.8G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.03% 498.1T 95.18% 579.5G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.23% 1.190T 0.25% 1.530G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 11.87G 0.01% 59.95M
Other4.74% 24.82T 4.56% 27.73G
Total100.00% 524.1T 100.00% 608.8G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.61% 3.219T 0.47% 2.888G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200004.32% 22.64T 3.03% 18.44G
200012.58% 13.52T 1.75% 10.67G
400011.90% 9.956T 1.54% 9.371G
400001.83% 9.586T 1.48% 9.024G
200021.43% 7.518T 1.00% 6.072G