Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070528

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070528 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 42.25% of octets and 22.64% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.378M 4 10.05M
5 1.459M 13 10.41M
10 1.555M 21 10.94M
50 3.075M 58 18.00M
90 10.24M 59 50.40M
95 13.94M 59 68.44M
99 41.24M 59 122.8M
99.9 961.4M 118 1.260G
99.99 1.029G 119 3.733G
99.999 1.274G 128 3.836G
100 259.2G 128 20.92G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.30% 1.720G
Medium (100-1400B)4.20% 5.531G
Large (1401-1500B)92.62% 122.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.88% 2.474G
Total100.00% 131.8G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers25.14% 52.75T 27.51% 36.27G 29.84% 2.150M
Measurement11.88% 24.92T 4.57% 6.026G 0.59% 42.45k
Encrypted Traffic8.76% 18.37T 9.17% 12.08G 7.68% 553.4k
File Sharing4.51% 9.455T 4.97% 6.551G 3.75% 270.0k
Advanced Apps3.98% 8.357T 4.30% 5.669G 5.49% 395.9k
Misc0.32% 672.8G 0.39% 514.5M 0.55% 39.34k
Audio/Video0.23% 473.3G 0.25% 328.8M 0.50% 36.19k
Games0.15% 310.1G 0.16% 213.8M 0.20% 14.69k
Unidentified45.04% 94.50T 48.67% 64.16G 51.40% 3.703M
Total100.00% 209.8T 100.00% 131.8G 100.00% 7.205M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.065G900037INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.118G900011Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.062G900013Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.036G900025ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.028G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
936.5M150048DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
858.7M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
835.2M150055DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Abilene [11537]Iperf
804.2M150058INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
497.8M142060LLL-TIS [45]UTAH [17055]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
389.4M150023UCLA [52]Oregon State U [4201]49000 -> 1227
271.8M150016NCSA [1224]Unknown [25776]57316 -> 60000
266.2M150010Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
197.2M150018NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
176.3M148118NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
163.1M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
154.9M142021APNIC [7575]SURFnet [1103]47831 -> 52100
147.0M142019Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]U N Texas [589]Rsync
143.5M142012NASA Internet [297]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
141.2M149943Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [25776]HTTP

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 599.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers29.86% 148.2T 32.81% 191.0G
Measurement6.60% 32.76T 2.21% 12.89G
Encrypted Traffic6.01% 29.84T 6.67% 38.82G
File Sharing3.31% 16.42T 3.29% 19.13G
Advanced Apps3.08% 15.28T 3.00% 17.48G
Audio/Video3.04% 15.10T 2.64% 15.38G
Misc1.65% 8.193T 3.69% 21.50G
Games0.35% 1.762T 0.57% 3.306G
Unidentified46.10% 228.9T 45.12% 262.6G
Total100.00% 496.6T 100.00% 582.2G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
21.62%
4.69%
1.85%
1.71%
---
107.3T
23.28T
9.162T
8.493T
---
25.28%
3.82%
2.06%
1.65%
---
147.1G
22.23G
12.01G
9.602G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
6.54%
0.05%
0.00%
---
32.49T
272.4G
4.449M
---
1.76%
0.46%
0.00%
---
10.23G
2.656G
61.80k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.28%
1.43%
0.28%
0.02%
0.00%
---
21.26T
7.077T
1.392T
103.5G
1.988G
---
4.13%
2.19%
0.31%
0.03%
0.00%
---
24.05G
12.75G
1.814G
188.1M
11.42M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.75%
0.58%
0.48%
0.32%
0.13%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.681T
2.871T
2.386T
1.608T
634.0G
179.0G
36.78G
10.48G
7.596G
4.639G
2.541G
680.8M
352.1k
---
1.47%
0.52%
0.61%
0.45%
0.14%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.576G
2.998G
3.567G
2.640G
792.1M
416.7M
62.77M
15.23M
9.716M
50.66M
3.049M
1.099M
7.200k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.84%
0.17%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.10T
845.3G
297.0G
20.52G
16.92G
749.3M
---
2.73%
0.17%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
15.88G
1.002G
477.8M
47.14M
70.55M
1.107M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
2.38%
0.57%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.83T
2.849T
333.3G
39.93G
23.94G
13.92G
1.620G
1.088G
0.000
---
1.88%
0.67%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.96G
3.904G
395.6M
53.89M
33.53M
20.02M
4.466M
2.652M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
AFS
IRC
Telnet
MS Windows
NTP
NFS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.87%
0.31%
0.20%
0.09%
0.08%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.337T
1.543T
972.8G
439.9G
376.7G
217.2G
74.33G
45.74G
42.76G
36.61G
35.88G
22.40G
21.05G
21.04G
5.235G
165.1M
30.05M
---
1.51%
0.47%
1.13%
0.08%
0.11%
0.08%
0.05%
0.06%
0.07%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.764G
2.712G
6.578G
490.2M
665.8M
486.0M
314.3M
372.8M
408.9M
480.3M
73.08M
36.93M
46.60M
30.70M
36.58M
2.859M
455.4k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.26%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.273T
291.3G
84.46G
58.06G
34.34G
10.97G
10.54G
---
0.31%
0.10%
0.11%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.832G
603.6M
648.8M
115.0M
48.10M
36.96M
20.83M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.10%
---
228.9T
---
45.12%
---
262.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
496.6T
---
100.00%
---
582.2G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 272.4G 0.46% 2.656G
IGMP[2]0.00% 51.41M 0.00% 1.440M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.05% 270.3G 0.05% 280.0M
TCP[6]85.38% 424.0T 83.21% 484.4G
UDP[17]6.25% 31.05T 9.30% 54.12G
IPv6[41]0.00% 6.228G 0.00% 16.08M
GRE[47]7.95% 39.47T 6.63% 38.61G
ESP[50]0.28% 1.392T 0.31% 1.814G
AX.25[93]0.00% 297.5k 0.00% 6.700k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.158G 0.01% 44.32M
IPMP[169]0.00% 4.449M 0.00% 61.80k
Other0.02% 107.5G 0.03% 196.4M
Total100.00% 496.6T 100.00% 582.2G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)37.50% 218.3G
Medium (100-1400B)18.57% 108.1G
Large (1401-1500B)43.25% 251.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.67% 3.917G
Total100.00% 582.2G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.22% 472.8T 95.26% 554.6G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.22% 1.079T 0.24% 1.408G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 9.558G 0.01% 49.58M
Other4.56% 22.63T 4.49% 26.12G
Total100.00% 496.6T 100.00% 582.2G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.67% 3.321T 0.52% 3.046G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200003.82% 18.95T 2.60% 15.11G
400002.43% 12.08T 1.89% 10.98G
200012.38% 11.83T 1.60% 9.338G
400012.02% 10.05T 1.60% 9.305G
200021.15% 5.730T 0.78% 4.515G