Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070521

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070521 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 42.62% of octets and 21.63% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.382M 4 10.05M
5 1.478M 13 10.50M
10 1.594M 22 11.07M
50 3.302M 58 18.78M
90 9.908M 59 50.25M
95 16.35M 59 65.60M
99 40.08M 59 128.6M
99.9 969.6M 119 1.379G
99.99 1.031G 119 3.731G
99.999 1.216G 121 3.815G
100 266.4G 143 7.064G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.14% 1.398G
Medium (100-1400B)4.42% 5.431G
Large (1401-1500B)92.51% 113.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.92% 2.360G
Total100.00% 122.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers24.96% 48.84T 27.39% 33.63G 30.55% 2.004M
Measurement11.78% 23.05T 3.84% 4.709G 0.58% 38.01k
Encrypted Traffic11.11% 21.73T 12.00% 14.72G 10.19% 668.4k
Advanced Apps4.24% 8.306T 4.60% 5.653G 5.95% 390.6k
File Sharing3.48% 6.803T 3.83% 4.707G 2.99% 196.0k
Misc0.33% 650.5G 0.43% 533.0M 0.63% 41.59k
Audio/Video0.29% 575.6G 0.34% 411.9M 0.68% 44.84k
Games0.16% 314.6G 0.18% 221.7M 0.22% 14.25k
Unidentified43.64% 85.41T 47.39% 58.18G 48.20% 3.162M
Total100.00% 195.7T 100.00% 122.7G 100.00% 6.560M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.083G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.079G900013Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.071G900011Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.031G900011ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
945.3M150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
867.1M150016SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
700.1M150013Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf
546.8M150022INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
487.4M149920Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
448.9M129541SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
519.6M150011NCSA [1224]Unknown [25776]36042 -> 60000
451.9M129034SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]SSH
357.8M150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
252.5M141919Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]U Arizona [1706]HTTP
210.1M150014Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
209.6M150026Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
204.1M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
180.0M150013PSC [1207]NCSA [1224]50006 -> 50000
178.5M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
176.7M147429NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 545.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers31.08% 142.7T 34.16% 193.8G
Encrypted Traffic7.39% 33.93T 7.67% 43.52G
Measurement6.61% 30.35T 1.85% 10.49G
Audio/Video3.43% 15.74T 2.81% 15.94G
Advanced Apps3.33% 15.29T 3.05% 17.32G
File Sharing2.93% 13.46T 3.06% 17.37G
Misc1.83% 8.391T 3.82% 21.66G
Games0.41% 1.862T 0.61% 3.483G
Unidentified42.99% 197.3T 42.97% 243.8G
Total100.00% 459.1T 100.00% 567.5G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
23.07%
4.53%
2.05%
1.43%
---
105.9T
20.81T
9.391T
6.570T
---
27.20%
3.56%
2.10%
1.29%
---
154.3G
20.22G
11.93G
7.329G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
5.40%
1.69%
0.28%
0.02%
0.00%
---
24.81T
7.771T
1.269T
81.47G
2.103G
---
4.90%
2.43%
0.31%
0.02%
0.00%
---
27.79G
13.81G
1.761G
131.9M
11.13M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
6.55%
0.06%
0.00%
---
30.09T
260.0G
7.675M
---
1.43%
0.42%
0.00%
---
8.130G
2.367G
106.6k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
2.66%
0.64%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.22T
2.959T
462.7G
51.95G
27.71G
12.38G
3.903G
1.081G
0.000
---
1.96%
0.74%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.09G
4.192G
518.3M
70.09M
39.32M
17.49M
10.81M
2.551M
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
3.10%
0.16%
0.07%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.21T
713.1G
341.0G
19.13G
5.719G
336.7M
---
2.81%
0.15%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
15.92G
879.6M
418.0M
44.27M
59.81M
531.9k
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.25%
0.62%
0.51%
0.34%
0.15%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.744T
2.842T
2.339T
1.552T
703.8G
215.0G
40.98G
12.75G
10.61G
4.716G
1.051G
602.8M
966.4k
---
1.07%
0.52%
0.76%
0.44%
0.15%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.070G
2.954G
4.314G
2.521G
859.8M
501.4M
60.95M
25.09M
11.55M
52.17M
1.255M
1.472M
10.70k
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
AFS
IRC
Telnet
NTP
MS Windows
NFS
IDENT
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.98%
0.36%
0.20%
0.10%
0.08%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.501T
1.656T
937.9G
465.6G
376.2G
171.3G
65.81G
43.80G
39.95G
37.21G
33.61G
23.99G
17.13G
15.92G
4.422G
251.9M
42.95M
---
1.56%
0.50%
1.17%
0.09%
0.12%
0.07%
0.05%
0.06%
0.09%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.870G
2.816G
6.648G
519.1M
672.2M
421.1M
277.8M
338.1M
524.1M
331.1M
99.37M
52.59M
27.53M
25.56M
32.90M
3.652M
435.9k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.28%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.300T
348.1G
84.60G
53.08G
52.60G
14.81G
9.121G
---
0.33%
0.12%
0.12%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
---
1.862G
693.6M
700.0M
75.49M
99.51M
21.82M
30.36M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
42.99%
---
197.3T
---
42.97%
---
243.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
459.1T
---
100.00%
---
567.5G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 260.0G 0.42% 2.367G
IGMP[2]0.00% 50.22M 0.00% 1.409M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.06% 269.2G 0.05% 309.9M
TCP[6]87.17% 400.2T 84.51% 479.6G
UDP[17]7.04% 32.33T 9.42% 53.49G
IPv6[41]0.00% 5.469G 0.00% 15.82M
GRE[47]5.38% 24.67T 5.21% 29.55G
ESP[50]0.28% 1.269T 0.31% 1.761G
AX.25[93]0.00% 324.9k 0.00% 7.100k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.071G 0.01% 45.07M
IPMP[169]0.00% 7.675M 0.00% 106.6k
Other0.02% 101.5G 0.07% 378.4M
Total100.00% 459.1T 100.00% 567.5G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.00% 227.0G
Medium (100-1400B)19.25% 109.2G
Large (1401-1500B)40.19% 228.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.56% 3.204G
Total100.00% 567.5G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.72% 434.9T 94.59% 536.8G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.39% 1.810T 0.43% 2.465G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 10.12G 0.01% 48.89M
Other4.88% 22.42T 4.97% 28.20G
Total100.00% 459.1T 100.00% 567.5G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.71% 3.274T 0.52% 2.959G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200001.32% 6.065T 1.16% 6.588G
21281.23% 5.625T 1.20% 6.817G
400000.86% 3.959T 0.65% 3.691G
400010.67% 3.065T 0.51% 2.868G
400020.61% 2.781T 0.46% 2.603G