Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070514

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070514 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 45.22% of octets and 20.39% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.375M 4 10.05M
5 1.457M 14 10.36M
10 1.545M 24 10.81M
50 2.549M 58 15.76M
90 9.463M 59 45.30M
95 15.71M 59 63.75M
99 43.67M 59 119.7M
99.9 985.0M 119 2.465G
99.99 1.044G 119 3.750G
99.999 1.311G 120 3.821G
100 259.2G 120 3.890G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.59% 1.292G
Medium (100-1400B)4.77% 3.867G
Large (1401-1500B)90.75% 73.59G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.88% 2.337G
Total100.00% 81.09G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers16.94% 22.82T 19.33% 15.67G 19.92% 943.6k
Measurement16.63% 22.39T 5.20% 4.215G 0.59% 27.94k
Encrypted Traffic12.28% 16.53T 13.98% 11.33G 10.59% 501.4k
Advanced Apps4.76% 6.409T 5.39% 4.371G 6.16% 291.8k
File Sharing3.62% 4.880T 4.19% 3.394G 3.24% 153.2k
Misc0.34% 462.9G 0.43% 348.6M 0.59% 27.87k
Audio/Video0.22% 293.2G 0.26% 210.3M 0.48% 22.79k
Games0.14% 185.3G 0.16% 128.7M 0.19% 9.028k
Unidentified45.07% 60.72T 51.07% 41.41G 58.25% 2.758M
Total100.00% 134.7T 100.00% 81.09G 100.00% 4.736M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.078G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.064G900016Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.049G900012ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.045G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
813.6M150013SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
521.8M148616Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
446.8M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
248.1M150012NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf
147.9M138725NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
121.8M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
235.0M150017PSC [1207]NCSA [1224]50007 -> 50000
206.0M150032TACCNET [32093]PSC [1207]35282 -> 50009
199.4M150028NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
195.6M147630NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
192.8M150016NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
158.9M150030APAN-JP [7660]Unknown [23796]34910 -> 56929
148.0M149714Unknown [0]NIST-BOULDER [2648]SSH
139.4M900038TACCNET [32093]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]SSH
137.1M150054Unknown [25776]NCSA [1224]42559 -> 50000
135.8M141917UTAH [17055]Unknown [0]HTTP

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 402.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers24.90% 74.16T 29.10% 115.7G
Measurement9.56% 28.47T 2.16% 8.575G
Encrypted Traffic8.79% 26.19T 8.27% 32.89G
Audio/Video5.37% 15.98T 4.04% 16.06G
Advanced Apps4.08% 12.14T 3.39% 13.46G
File Sharing3.27% 9.734T 3.24% 12.89G
Misc1.99% 5.943T 3.82% 15.20G
Games0.40% 1.191T 0.62% 2.471G
Unidentified41.65% 124.0T 45.36% 180.4G
Total100.00% 297.9T 100.00% 397.7G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
17.90%
4.07%
1.65%
1.28%
---
53.31T
12.11T
4.924T
3.814T
---
23.25%
3.12%
1.61%
1.12%
---
92.48G
12.42G
6.417G
4.440G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
9.49%
0.07%
0.00%
---
28.27T
196.6G
9.698M
---
1.63%
0.53%
0.00%
---
6.465G
2.109G
134.7k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
6.33%
2.15%
0.29%
0.03%
0.00%
---
18.84T
6.398T
870.1G
75.89G
1.113G
---
5.19%
2.74%
0.31%
0.03%
0.00%
---
20.63G
10.89G
1.233G
116.5M
6.876M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Backbone Radio
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
4.80%
0.46%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.30T
1.382T
230.5G
35.81G
17.27G
14.10G
958.2M
222.9M
0.000
---
3.37%
0.59%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.41G
2.330G
227.9M
48.85M
19.35M
22.16M
2.884M
657.3k
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
3.89%
0.14%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.59T
416.9G
111.8G
11.60G
3.639G
430.9M
---
3.19%
0.15%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
12.69G
591.5M
108.3M
28.60M
43.53M
559.1k
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.28%
0.75%
0.62%
0.38%
0.15%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.814T
2.241T
1.847T
1.140T
458.8G
189.9G
22.86G
9.534G
3.972G
3.608G
1.242G
906.2M
225.0k
---
1.08%
0.62%
0.83%
0.44%
0.14%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.307G
2.463G
3.307G
1.765G
540.6M
397.8M
38.16M
22.89M
5.594M
38.20M
1.532M
1.418M
4.700k
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
AFS
NTP
Telnet
IRC
MS Windows
NFS
IDENT
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.98%
0.40%
0.21%
0.20%
0.11%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.911T
1.199T
636.0G
590.4G
313.2G
117.5G
34.55G
33.99G
30.13G
18.93G
16.88G
14.41G
14.00G
10.30G
2.021G
61.54M
13.98M
---
1.47%
0.53%
1.18%
0.17%
0.12%
0.07%
0.11%
0.07%
0.03%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.830G
2.089G
4.704G
667.2M
467.6M
281.9M
453.6M
269.2M
129.3M
199.1M
29.30M
32.98M
16.17M
16.48M
16.85M
803.9k
241.0k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Starsiege Tribes
Quake
Asheron
Spy Arcade
---
0.28%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
843.2G
202.0G
63.03G
43.24G
31.60G
5.943G
2.684G
---
0.32%
0.11%
0.14%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
---
1.289G
445.9M
574.2M
35.69M
81.11M
19.56M
25.78M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.65%
---
124.0T
---
45.36%
---
180.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
297.9T
---
100.00%
---
397.7G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 196.6G 0.53% 2.109G
IGMP[2]0.00% 44.67M 0.00% 1.250M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 13.64G 0.04% 168.3M
TCP[6]88.46% 263.5T 82.95% 329.9G
UDP[17]10.06% 29.95T 10.90% 43.37G
IPv6[41]0.00% 1.598G 0.00% 6.676M
GRE[47]0.94% 2.800T 5.07% 20.17G
ESP[50]0.29% 870.1G 0.31% 1.233G
AX.25[93]0.00% 181.4k 0.00% 4.500k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.182G 0.01% 33.93M
IPMP[169]0.00% 9.698M 0.00% 134.7k
Other0.18% 546.4G 0.18% 725.0M
Total100.00% 297.9T 100.00% 397.7G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)45.31% 180.2G
Medium (100-1400B)19.34% 76.92G
Large (1401-1500B)34.59% 137.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.76% 3.041G
Total100.00% 397.7G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]93.87% 279.6T 93.78% 373.0G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.78% 2.309T 0.81% 3.206G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 10.18G 0.01% 49.18M
Other5.35% 15.93T 5.40% 21.49G
Total100.00% 297.9T 100.00% 397.7G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable1.37% 4.094T 1.11% 4.420G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
400001.99% 5.936T 1.42% 5.653G
200001.39% 4.134T 1.14% 4.526G
21281.00% 2.987T 0.92% 3.656G
400010.96% 2.852T 0.69% 2.734G
200010.82% 2.452T 0.67% 2.676G