Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070507

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070507 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 37.87% of octets and 16.54% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.382M 6 10.05M
5 1.463M 17 10.36M
10 1.559M 26 10.88M
50 2.971M 58 17.55M
90 8.294M 59 51.22M
95 13.29M 59 65.42M
99 52.93M 59 178.1M
99.9 1.012G 59 3.680G
99.99 1.112G 59 3.789G
99.999 2.173G 60 3.879G
100 266.4G 118 6.561G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.76% 1.223G
Medium (100-1400B)4.30% 1.400G
Large (1401-1500B)84.22% 27.41G
Jumbo (>1500B)7.72% 2.512G
Total100.00% 32.54G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement34.87% 22.66T 11.61% 3.779G 1.42% 23.44k
Encrypted Traffic14.09% 9.155T 18.61% 6.056G 12.87% 212.1k
Data Transfers11.08% 7.200T 15.68% 5.102G 21.02% 346.5k
Advanced Apps8.09% 5.261T 11.03% 3.590G 13.43% 221.4k
File Sharing1.47% 958.1G 2.11% 686.1M 1.91% 31.53k
Misc0.25% 163.6G 0.37% 120.2M 0.66% 10.93k
Audio/Video0.12% 74.93G 0.16% 53.59M 0.32% 5.350k
Games0.06% 40.64G 0.09% 28.19M 0.13% 2.063k
Unidentified29.97% 19.48T 40.35% 13.13G 48.24% 795.5k
Total100.00% 65.00T 100.00% 32.54G 100.00% 1.649M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.118G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.081G899410High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.064G900012Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.039G900015ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
722.5M150011SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
367.0M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
107.1M150010Abilene [11537]UNIVHAWAII [6360]Iperf
44.66M150013Australia [4621]Unknown [24490]Iperf
41.38M150031ALLGOOD [17153]Abilene [11537]Iperf
35.45M150020ALLGOOD [17153]MIT Lincoln Lab [63]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
922.5M900020SDSC [195]NCSA [1224]51236 -> 5150
306.1M150022UNL [7896]U Wisconsin [59]20000 -> 49470
286.1M150011TACCNET [32093]PSC [1207]48436 -> 50008
136.5M900060TACCNET [32093]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]SSH
129.8M150031UNL [7896]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]20002 -> 50958
125.2M150016ESnet-West [292]UCAR [194]49711 -> 60979
99.63M150016Los Alamos [68]UCAR [194]HTTP
98.42M150017UCAR [194]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]55668 -> 5102
92.37M150012JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
89.80M150022Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 141.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers21.48% 36.86T 28.69% 56.46G
Measurement16.66% 28.60T 4.21% 8.284G
Audio/Video11.65% 19.99T 9.27% 18.25G
Encrypted Traffic9.03% 15.49T 9.20% 18.11G
Advanced Apps4.97% 8.538T 4.62% 9.090G
File Sharing1.72% 2.944T 2.34% 4.605G
Misc1.69% 2.904T 3.48% 6.845G
Games0.35% 598.6G 0.65% 1.273G
Unidentified32.45% 55.71T 37.53% 73.86G
Total100.00% 171.6T 100.00% 196.7G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
17.92%
1.51%
1.26%
0.78%
---
30.76T
2.597T
2.167T
1.341T
---
24.30%
1.91%
1.18%
1.31%
---
47.81G
3.753G
2.320G
2.573G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
16.57%
0.10%
0.00%
---
28.43T
164.0G
0.000
---
2.86%
1.35%
0.00%
---
5.620G
2.663G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
11.07%
0.51%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.01T
872.4G
89.64G
12.55G
7.941G
3.239G
551.3M
197.4M
0.000
---
8.61%
0.60%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.94G
1.179G
86.52M
14.64M
13.56M
5.107M
1.373M
437.7k
0.000
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
5.94%
2.72%
0.34%
0.03%
0.00%
---
10.18T
4.670T
583.3G
56.13G
554.1M
---
4.93%
3.95%
0.30%
0.03%
0.00%
---
9.702G
7.763G
595.0M
49.49M
3.768M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
4.87%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.362T
91.03G
69.89G
8.651G
3.546G
2.106G
---
4.39%
0.09%
0.12%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
---
8.635G
171.5M
243.3M
6.268M
10.17M
23.79M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Direct Connect++
Neo-Modus
---
0.64%
0.47%
0.34%
0.18%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.090T
805.3G
581.3G
316.1G
79.88G
53.26G
11.63G
4.432G
987.5M
883.2M
253.0M
18.27M
8.746M
---
0.69%
0.47%
0.63%
0.41%
0.04%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.365G
919.6M
1.233G
812.2M
88.16M
146.8M
18.78M
6.392M
2.144M
10.49M
657.6k
15.80k
185.3k
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
X11
Port 0
AFS
Telnet
NFS
IRC
NTP
MS Windows
IDENT
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.91%
0.36%
0.15%
0.13%
0.06%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.565T
611.5G
257.5G
221.7G
107.8G
31.77G
27.31G
25.34G
17.42G
17.35G
5.767G
5.249G
4.694G
3.626G
1.232G
36.36M
7.038M
---
1.38%
0.64%
0.87%
0.18%
0.07%
0.04%
0.09%
0.02%
0.03%
0.12%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.723G
1.267G
1.715G
350.1M
130.4M
76.67M
178.6M
30.90M
49.59M
228.1M
62.17M
8.933M
8.361M
4.314M
9.972M
547.5k
155.3k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.26%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
444.8G
104.3G
33.62G
9.453G
4.420G
1.650G
250.8M
---
0.34%
0.12%
0.17%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
668.1M
226.7M
330.7M
30.42M
11.75M
3.983M
1.299M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
32.45%
---
55.71T
---
37.53%
---
73.86G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
171.6T
---
100.00%
---
196.7G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.10% 164.0G 1.35% 2.663G
IGMP[2]0.00% 38.75M 0.00% 1.090M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 1.363G 0.01% 14.13M
TCP[6]75.19% 129.0T 74.55% 146.7G
UDP[17]18.01% 30.92T 15.24% 29.99G
IPv6[41]0.03% 45.03G 0.03% 61.81M
GRE[47]5.57% 9.564T 7.68% 15.11G
ESP[50]0.34% 583.3G 0.30% 595.0M
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 2.378G 0.01% 28.24M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.76% 1.309T 0.82% 1.612G
Total100.00% 171.6T 100.00% 196.7G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.41% 77.56G
Medium (100-1400B)26.86% 52.86G
Large (1401-1500B)31.78% 62.54G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.94% 3.824G
Total100.00% 196.7G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.96% 163.0T 95.11% 187.1G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.02% 35.65G 0.12% 229.8M
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 909.9M 0.00% 2.576M
Other5.02% 8.622T 4.77% 9.385G
Total100.00% 171.6T 100.00% 196.7G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable1.99% 3.415T 2.06% 4.050G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200001.88% 3.226T 1.37% 2.700G
200011.25% 2.149T 0.87% 1.705G
200020.96% 1.645T 0.65% 1.276G
21280.90% 1.549T 1.00% 1.972G
200030.66% 1.133T 0.47% 921.8M