Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070423

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070423 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 33.79% of octets and 15.02% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.368M 5 10.05M
5 1.460M 13 10.45M
10 1.562M 21 10.95M
50 2.967M 58 17.25M
90 10.18M 59 45.44M
95 15.57M 59 65.85M
99 44.77M 94 135.6M
99.9 993.5M 119 3.404G
99.99 1.061G 119 3.750G
99.999 1.785G 121 3.844G
100 266.4G 126 6.342G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.56% 1.796G
Medium (100-1400B)7.12% 8.215G
Large (1401-1500B)86.77% 100.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)4.55% 5.251G
Total100.00% 115.3G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers27.16% 55.70T 33.16% 38.24G 37.50% 2.386M
Measurement22.98% 47.14T 6.94% 8.000G 0.76% 48.64k
Encrypted Traffic7.98% 16.36T 8.79% 10.13G 7.40% 470.5k
Advanced Apps3.91% 8.020T 4.70% 5.419G 6.04% 384.0k
File Sharing3.63% 7.447T 4.45% 5.134G 3.21% 204.2k
Misc0.45% 928.1G 0.57% 662.8M 0.76% 48.04k
Audio/Video0.23% 479.4G 0.29% 331.6M 0.55% 34.94k
Games0.20% 404.6G 0.26% 296.4M 0.32% 20.64k
Unidentified33.46% 68.62T 40.84% 47.10G 43.46% 2.765M
Total100.00% 205.1T 100.00% 115.3G 100.00% 6.362M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.140G900012Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.056G900011Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.046G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.021G900026ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
851.6M150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
850.2M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
741.3M150040U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]NCSA [1224]Iperf
598.6M150031NCSA [1224]U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]Iperf
414.4M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
367.6M150016Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
931.9M900028NCSA [1224]SDSC [195]39620 -> 5150
495.1M150017NCSA [1224]U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]53854 -> 53420
413.1M900022SDSC [195]NCSA [1224]54948 -> 5150
294.9M900050NCSA [1224]UCAR [194]56173 -> 5150
283.6M142043UTAH [17055]Baylor College of Medicine [302]HTTP
272.3M900014UCAR [194]NCSA [1224]37685 -> 5150
242.8M150014NCSA [1224]Unknown [27274]IRC
207.2M148410NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
202.7M150041UCLA [52]Oregon State U [4201]49000 -> 1102
173.5M150028Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 530.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers34.94% 212.1T 37.41% 287.2G
Measurement10.29% 62.46T 3.41% 26.18G
Encrypted Traffic5.70% 34.61T 6.70% 51.45G
Audio/Video5.17% 31.39T 3.87% 29.73G
File Sharing3.17% 19.23T 3.67% 28.21G
Advanced Apps2.57% 15.61T 2.38% 18.24G
Misc1.74% 10.56T 3.43% 26.34G
Games0.51% 3.117T 1.02% 7.822G
Unidentified35.91% 217.9T 38.11% 292.6G
Total100.00% 607.1T 100.00% 767.9G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
29.61%
2.71%
1.44%
1.17%
---
179.7T
16.43T
8.758T
7.128T
---
32.79%
2.22%
1.36%
1.05%
---
251.7G
17.02G
10.40G
8.062G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
10.16%
0.13%
0.00%
---
61.69T
765.4G
13.60M
---
1.73%
1.68%
0.00%
---
13.31G
12.87G
189.0k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.16%
2.29%
0.23%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.20T
13.91T
1.392T
87.30G
7.362G
---
2.85%
3.57%
0.24%
0.02%
0.03%
---
21.87G
27.38G
1.854G
146.0M
196.2M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
4.46%
0.61%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.08T
3.676T
439.5G
109.7G
43.09G
28.89G
2.272G
1.525G
522.8M
---
3.09%
0.67%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.75G
5.181G
529.8M
150.3M
62.86M
44.20M
6.249M
3.387M
385.6k
File Sharing
BitTorrent
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
1.00%
0.77%
0.56%
0.53%
0.15%
0.13%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.097T
4.665T
3.381T
3.237T
925.4G
805.4G
63.75G
20.96G
19.91G
9.240G
2.238G
2.206G
45.24M
---
1.46%
0.74%
0.56%
0.42%
0.15%
0.29%
0.01%
0.00%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.18G
5.680G
4.337G
3.204G
1.188G
2.226G
101.7M
35.25M
231.3M
15.45M
9.157M
3.104M
78.60k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.43%
0.11%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.77T
681.4G
120.2G
23.66G
13.76G
4.776G
---
2.23%
0.11%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
17.13G
810.2M
178.7M
51.02M
66.21M
5.210M
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
X11
IRC
AFS
Telnet
MS Windows
NFS
AOL AIM
IDENT
NTP
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.91%
0.24%
0.20%
0.17%
0.09%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.502T
1.474T
1.232T
1.024T
559.4G
229.0G
192.9G
83.19G
69.16G
51.15G
44.71G
38.42G
36.09G
21.52G
6.194G
354.9M
22.31M
---
1.36%
0.34%
0.19%
1.08%
0.13%
0.05%
0.06%
0.05%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.44G
2.577G
1.441G
8.290G
968.8M
421.6M
443.8M
358.4M
593.1M
99.49M
68.25M
79.17M
473.3M
44.53M
43.86M
3.607M
404.9k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Asheron
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.34%
0.06%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.081T
381.6G
362.9G
138.9G
87.58G
46.92G
17.41G
---
0.44%
0.13%
0.39%
0.01%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.406G
1.016G
2.975G
108.9M
213.6M
67.19M
35.00M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
35.91%
---
217.9T
---
38.11%
---
292.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
607.1T
---
100.00%
---
767.9G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.13% 765.4G 1.68% 12.87G
IGMP[2]0.00% 49.08M 0.00% 1.392M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 78.35M 0.00% 431.9k
TCP[6]84.01% 510.0T 83.71% 642.8G
UDP[17]13.18% 79.98T 12.38% 95.08G
IPv6[41]0.01% 30.87G 0.01% 47.27M
GRE[47]2.24% 13.57T 1.76% 13.50G
ESP[50]0.23% 1.392T 0.24% 1.854G
AX.25[93]0.00% 244.6k 0.00% 5.800k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.521G 0.01% 47.96M
IPMP[169]0.00% 13.60M 0.00% 189.0k
Other0.22% 1.328T 0.22% 1.695G
Total100.00% 607.1T 100.00% 767.9G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.57% 326.9G
Medium (100-1400B)23.39% 179.6G
Large (1401-1500B)32.83% 252.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.20% 9.225G
Total100.00% 767.9G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.29% 578.5T 94.83% 728.3G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.70% 4.226T 0.76% 5.812G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 55.50G 0.02% 160.3M
Other4.01% 24.32T 4.39% 33.69G
Total100.00% 607.1T 100.00% 767.9G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.76% 4.638T 0.64% 4.900G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
520001.99% 12.05T 0.19% 1.494G
327681.60% 9.715T 0.16% 1.207G
200000.87% 5.275T 0.66% 5.035G
400000.75% 4.571T 0.56% 4.281G
21280.75% 4.566T 0.74% 5.720G