Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070416

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070416 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 32.32% of octets and 15.67% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.369M 5 10.05M
5 1.456M 13 10.36M
10 1.552M 21 10.83M
50 2.825M 58 16.89M
90 9.823M 59 43.35M
95 15.58M 59 60.75M
99 50.21M 59 138.1M
99.9 992.4M 119 3.342G
99.99 1.065G 119 3.746G
99.999 2.147G 128 3.815G
100 266.4G 129 3.905G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.55% 3.063G
Medium (100-1400B)7.11% 8.535G
Large (1401-1500B)85.94% 103.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)4.39% 5.275G
Total100.00% 120.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers26.26% 55.23T 31.64% 37.98G 36.60% 2.429M
Measurement23.42% 49.26T 8.60% 10.32G 0.86% 57.18k
Encrypted Traffic8.38% 17.62T 9.28% 11.13G 7.74% 513.6k
File Sharing3.69% 7.760T 4.46% 5.353G 3.38% 224.5k
Advanced Apps3.61% 7.592T 4.27% 5.127G 5.33% 353.5k
Misc0.41% 863.5G 0.51% 612.5M 0.74% 49.01k
Audio/Video0.30% 627.9G 0.36% 430.5M 0.73% 48.46k
Games0.23% 481.2G 0.28% 340.4M 0.37% 24.26k
Unidentified33.70% 70.88T 40.59% 48.73G 44.26% 2.938M
Total100.00% 210.3T 100.00% 120.0G 100.00% 6.639M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.103G900011Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.080G900011Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.033G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
950.9M900010ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
803.2M150018SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
407.3M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
402.0M150012Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
354.7M150030Unknown [36375]Unknown [32361]Iperf
288.4M150011Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
246.8M150011Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
489.3M150017NCSA [1224]U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]60875 -> 46351
418.5M150025IIJNET [2501]FR [2200]34060 -> 5555
268.5M150026UCLA [52]Unknown [32361]57306 -> 54321
231.4M150059NCSA [1224]Unknown [27274]IRC
204.2M148117NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
153.5M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
151.3M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
150.4M150012NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
146.8M790060GIGAPOP-NE [10578]Unknown [23796]49166 -> 60554
143.1M150012ORNL [50]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]43336 -> 33183

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 556.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers31.66% 206.0T 35.98% 275.6G
Measurement9.95% 64.73T 2.84% 21.73G
Encrypted Traffic5.42% 35.26T 6.50% 49.81G
Audio/Video4.23% 27.49T 3.55% 27.17G
File Sharing3.19% 20.77T 3.77% 28.88G
Advanced Apps2.31% 15.02T 2.29% 17.53G
Misc1.63% 10.62T 4.11% 31.45G
Games0.49% 3.162T 1.01% 7.734G
Unidentified41.13% 267.6T 39.97% 306.2G
Total100.00% 650.7T 100.00% 766.2G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
26.29%
2.42%
1.64%
1.31%
---
171.0T
15.77T
10.66T
8.521T
---
30.95%
2.10%
1.61%
1.32%
---
237.1G
16.06G
12.35G
10.11G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
9.87%
0.08%
0.00%
---
64.24T
489.9G
18.58M
---
2.06%
0.78%
0.00%
---
15.78G
5.953G
258.1k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.08%
2.11%
0.21%
0.02%
0.00%
---
20.05T
13.71T
1.392T
100.8G
2.062G
---
2.73%
3.50%
0.25%
0.02%
0.00%
---
20.94G
26.81G
1.896G
151.3M
10.21M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
3.38%
0.73%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.02T
4.745T
512.0G
104.9G
77.21G
21.55G
3.657G
3.007G
0.000
---
2.62%
0.81%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.07G
6.223G
598.4M
140.5M
94.11M
31.83M
7.675M
6.662M
0.000
File Sharing
BitTorrent
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
1.01%
0.82%
0.61%
0.47%
0.14%
0.12%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.551T
5.321T
3.962T
3.085T
927.1G
783.3G
61.08G
38.50G
20.04G
14.14G
3.615G
2.399G
2.948M
---
1.50%
0.82%
0.58%
0.40%
0.16%
0.25%
0.01%
0.01%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.51G
6.290G
4.457G
3.057G
1.189G
1.949G
96.61M
64.27M
234.2M
20.34M
7.050M
3.025M
19.60k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
2.15%
0.11%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.96T
722.1G
263.2G
31.76G
24.75G
12.68G
---
2.12%
0.11%
0.04%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
---
16.24G
836.9M
308.6M
35.46M
51.79M
60.00M
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
IRC
AFS
Telnet
NFS
MS Windows
NTP
AOL AIM
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.88%
0.23%
0.16%
0.14%
0.09%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.708T
1.478T
1.026T
901.0G
580.6G
375.5G
212.0G
75.94G
69.23G
50.29G
40.43G
40.01G
34.33G
30.67G
5.468G
149.9M
24.26M
---
1.37%
0.38%
1.05%
0.15%
0.12%
0.77%
0.06%
0.05%
0.01%
0.06%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.53G
2.889G
8.028G
1.117G
881.9M
5.865G
460.9M
380.3M
108.3M
439.6M
530.3M
58.18M
66.90M
56.38M
40.92M
2.147M
386.2k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.34%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.204T
388.6G
352.6G
139.7G
35.30G
23.36G
18.93G
---
0.46%
0.13%
0.37%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.489G
988.5M
2.809G
280.0M
88.04M
37.85M
40.12M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.13%
---
267.6T
---
39.97%
---
306.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
650.7T
---
100.00%
---
766.2G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.08% 489.9G 0.78% 5.953G
IGMP[2]0.00% 65.10M 0.00% 1.513M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 9.689M 0.00% 134.1k
TCP[6]79.06% 514.4T 83.69% 641.2G
UDP[17]17.49% 113.7T 12.45% 95.39G
IPv6[41]0.00% 3.513G 0.00% 16.89M
GRE[47]2.96% 19.24T 2.58% 19.79G
ESP[50]0.21% 1.392T 0.25% 1.896G
AX.25[93]0.00% 5.926M 0.00% 94.90k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.193G 0.01% 45.25M
IPMP[169]0.00% 18.58M 0.00% 258.1k
Other0.21% 1.357T 0.25% 1.879G
Total100.00% 650.7T 100.00% 766.2G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.93% 321.2G
Medium (100-1400B)21.93% 168.0G
Large (1401-1500B)34.18% 261.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.96% 15.01G
Total100.00% 766.2G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.20% 619.5T 94.84% 726.7G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.60% 3.902T 0.69% 5.324G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 27.07G 0.01% 94.05M
Other4.19% 27.28T 4.45% 34.09G
Total100.00% 650.7T 100.00% 766.2G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.70% 4.540T 0.63% 4.829G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
520008.06% 52.44T 0.85% 6.507G
327685.51% 35.83T 0.58% 4.460G
21280.66% 4.305T 0.71% 5.428G
327690.57% 3.686T 0.06% 461.0M
327710.54% 3.484T 0.06% 436.2M