Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070409

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070409 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 36.35% of octets and 17.37% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.374M 5 10.05M
5 1.453M 13 10.36M
10 1.542M 22 10.80M
50 2.849M 58 16.98M
90 9.365M 59 44.87M
95 14.82M 59 59.70M
99 56.11M 59 134.7M
99.9 996.9M 119 3.483G
99.99 1.062G 119 3.753G
99.999 1.841G 120 3.822G
100 259.2G 120 4.522G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.48% 4.521G
Medium (100-1400B)7.41% 9.631G
Large (1401-1500B)84.34% 109.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)4.77% 6.202G
Total100.00% 129.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement27.63% 63.11T 12.63% 16.42G 0.96% 65.12k
Data Transfers22.13% 50.54T 26.61% 34.58G 32.32% 2.200M
Encrypted Traffic9.06% 20.68T 10.52% 13.67G 8.43% 573.9k
File Sharing3.43% 7.838T 4.19% 5.447G 3.49% 237.9k
Advanced Apps3.28% 7.500T 3.90% 5.071G 5.17% 352.2k
Misc0.36% 832.6G 0.46% 592.5M 0.70% 47.82k
Audio/Video0.31% 702.1G 0.37% 483.4M 0.79% 53.61k
Games0.19% 428.4G 0.24% 308.0M 0.34% 22.81k
Unidentified33.60% 76.73T 41.08% 53.39G 47.80% 3.254M
Total100.00% 228.3T 100.00% 129.9G 100.00% 6.808M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.120G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.087G900014Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.047G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
941.6M900010ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
880.1M150010SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
503.8M142060UTAH [17055]LLL-TIS [45]Iperf
500.0M142060LLL-TIS [45]UTAH [17055]Iperf
399.8M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
376.5M150016Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
331.7M150022NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
612.4M150014NCSA [1224]U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]35825 -> 56766
508.8M150060Oregon State U [4201]UCLA [52]1121 -> 49000
405.3M150016UCLA [52]Oregon State U [4201]49000 -> 1147
310.7M900038Argonne [683]UCAR [194]55467 -> 5150
296.5M900060NCSA [1224]UCAR [194]39025 -> 5150
255.8M900050UCAR [194]NCSA [1224]50152 -> 5150
240.3M142017UTAH [17055]Pennsylvania State U [3999]HTTP
227.3M150026NCSA [1224]Unknown [27274]40330 -> 56971
222.1M150060Spain [766]JPL [127]8047 -> 13431
220.2M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 575.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers29.58% 185.8T 32.78% 245.2G
Measurement12.83% 80.59T 3.55% 26.58G
Encrypted Traffic5.95% 37.40T 6.95% 51.97G
Audio/Video4.29% 26.93T 3.65% 27.30G
File Sharing3.23% 20.28T 3.63% 27.16G
Advanced Apps2.32% 14.58T 2.34% 17.48G
Misc1.55% 9.729T 3.17% 23.70G
Games0.49% 3.094T 1.08% 8.078G
Unidentified39.76% 249.7T 42.86% 320.7G
Total100.00% 628.2T 100.00% 748.3G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
24.49%
2.34%
1.39%
1.37%
---
153.8T
14.67T
8.703T
8.618T
---
28.16%
2.00%
1.24%
1.39%
---
210.6G
14.95G
9.268G
10.36G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
12.77%
0.06%
0.00%
---
80.21T
376.5G
11.75M
---
2.97%
0.58%
0.00%
---
22.26G
4.321G
163.3k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.74%
2.02%
0.17%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.51T
12.71T
1.091T
78.88G
1.612G
---
3.44%
3.27%
0.21%
0.02%
0.00%
---
25.77G
24.46G
1.607G
122.2M
8.665M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
3.59%
0.58%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.54T
3.647T
581.9G
84.39G
46.83G
22.69G
3.762G
1.813G
8.000k
---
2.89%
0.65%
0.09%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.60G
4.837G
639.3M
121.1M
67.59M
31.70M
8.065M
3.964M
200.0
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
0.95%
0.92%
0.58%
0.52%
0.14%
0.10%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.970T
5.774T
3.670T
3.248T
869.7G
642.6G
56.16G
20.11G
17.23G
8.065G
6.210G
1.706G
1.170M
---
0.91%
1.31%
0.58%
0.43%
0.15%
0.21%
0.01%
0.00%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.843G
9.774G
4.348G
3.213G
1.103G
1.544G
85.81M
32.00M
199.0M
12.22M
5.981M
2.302M
18.90k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
2.15%
0.12%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.52T
740.6G
242.0G
42.81G
24.62G
15.60G
---
2.13%
0.11%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
15.92G
852.0M
544.0M
47.78M
51.41M
57.86M
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
AFS
IRC
NFS
AOL AIM
Telnet
MS Windows
NTP
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.81%
0.26%
0.15%
0.13%
0.09%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.079T
1.608T
931.4G
836.1G
572.5G
187.5G
167.6G
97.30G
51.08G
51.04G
43.88G
41.91G
31.47G
23.67G
4.583G
152.2M
9.331M
---
1.26%
0.37%
0.95%
0.13%
0.12%
0.06%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.04%
0.06%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.450G
2.753G
7.128G
998.1M
894.2M
460.2M
417.3M
121.4M
74.84M
278.7M
435.3M
549.8M
54.06M
49.97M
38.60M
1.843M
217.9k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.33%
0.07%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.104T
419.0G
408.6G
90.50G
28.33G
24.81G
18.99G
---
0.44%
0.42%
0.17%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.299G
3.169G
1.243G
206.4M
77.94M
42.38M
38.60M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.76%
---
249.7T
---
42.86%
---
320.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
628.2T
---
100.00%
---
748.3G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 376.5G 0.58% 4.321G
IGMP[2]0.00% 56.63M 0.00% 1.422M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 35.44M 0.00% 259.0k
TCP[6]82.36% 517.4T 83.16% 622.2G
UDP[17]12.54% 78.79T 12.27% 91.84G
IPv6[41]0.00% 22.60G 0.00% 34.15M
GRE[47]3.88% 24.37T 3.28% 24.52G
ESP[50]0.17% 1.091T 0.21% 1.607G
AX.25[93]0.00% 585.5k 0.00% 7.800k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.149G 0.01% 45.68M
IPMP[169]0.00% 11.75M 0.00% 163.3k
Other0.98% 6.163T 0.49% 3.648G
Total100.00% 628.2T 100.00% 748.3G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.08% 307.4G
Medium (100-1400B)21.81% 163.2G
Large (1401-1500B)35.44% 265.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.67% 12.48G
Total100.00% 748.3G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.12% 597.5T 95.19% 712.3G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.45% 2.832T 0.53% 3.985G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 12.93G 0.01% 52.80M
Other4.43% 27.83T 4.27% 31.93G
Total100.00% 628.2T 100.00% 748.3G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.71% 4.433T 0.64% 4.754G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
520002.65% 16.62T 0.29% 2.172G
327741.87% 11.73T 0.19% 1.454G
400001.45% 9.128T 1.20% 8.974G
200000.96% 6.045T 0.99% 7.380G
400010.75% 4.741T 0.61% 4.546G