Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070326

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070326 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.23% of octets and 19.94% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.377M 5 10.05M
5 1.468M 14 10.50M
10 1.569M 24 10.95M
50 2.770M 58 17.10M
90 8.833M 59 42.75M
95 14.43M 59 57.45M
99 55.61M 59 132.7M
99.9 995.5M 119 3.395G
99.99 1.061G 120 3.751G
99.999 1.937G 152 3.818G
100 266.4G 162 4.532G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.79% 2.705G
Medium (100-1400B)6.78% 10.23G
Large (1401-1500B)86.80% 131.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)4.62% 6.981G
Total100.00% 150.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement24.61% 66.33T 7.93% 11.97G 0.79% 66.32k
Data Transfers18.29% 49.27T 22.55% 34.05G 24.19% 2.036M
Encrypted Traffic6.03% 16.25T 7.28% 10.99G 6.53% 549.4k
File Sharing3.47% 9.360T 4.30% 6.496G 3.33% 279.9k
Advanced Apps3.00% 8.077T 3.63% 5.474G 4.53% 381.1k
Misc0.26% 702.2G 0.33% 499.1M 0.48% 40.77k
Audio/Video0.21% 570.8G 0.26% 392.3M 0.53% 44.27k
Games0.16% 431.0G 0.20% 307.4M 0.26% 21.71k
Unidentified43.97% 118.4T 53.51% 80.78G 59.37% 4.997M
Total100.00% 269.4T 100.00% 150.9G 100.00% 8.416M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.141G900016Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.070G900020Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.036G899410High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.031G900020ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
495.0M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
412.1M142060UTAH [17055]LLL-TIS [45]Iperf
361.8M150014Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
288.3M150011Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
282.9M142060LLL-TIS [45]UTAH [17055]Iperf
252.8M900020NIST-BOULDER [2648]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
743.1M143321U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]NCSA [1224]58497 -> 54112
467.3M150018NCSA [1224]U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]58374 -> 58303
252.3M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
247.8M150013NCSA [1224]Unknown [27274]54633 -> 48717
227.9M150025NASA GSFC [1701]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
202.0M147830NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
190.7M150012Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
189.6M150023NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
152.0M150012INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]57032 -> 37814
137.8M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 716.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers25.36% 169.8T 29.15% 220.6G
Measurement12.87% 86.19T 2.89% 21.89G
Encrypted Traffic4.75% 31.80T 6.17% 46.67G
Audio/Video3.58% 23.98T 3.22% 24.34G
File Sharing2.92% 19.54T 3.38% 25.58G
Advanced Apps2.24% 15.00T 2.42% 18.33G
Misc1.40% 9.363T 2.95% 22.30G
Games0.43% 2.913T 0.96% 7.237G
Unidentified46.46% 311.1T 48.88% 370.0G
Total100.00% 669.8T 100.00% 757.0G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
20.76%
1.81%
1.47%
1.32%
---
139.0T
12.13T
9.820T
8.831T
---
24.67%
1.62%
1.47%
1.39%
---
186.7G
12.23G
11.14G
10.54G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
12.82%
0.05%
0.00%
---
85.88T
310.0G
23.81M
---
2.41%
0.49%
0.00%
---
18.21G
3.673G
330.8k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.86%
1.62%
0.26%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.15T
10.86T
1.709T
76.20G
1.628G
---
3.14%
2.71%
0.29%
0.02%
0.00%
---
23.78G
20.53G
2.226G
122.0M
8.724M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
3.01%
0.46%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.18T
3.066T
568.8G
74.53G
61.00G
25.05G
2.405G
2.323G
16.00k
---
2.57%
0.53%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.48G
4.017G
604.8M
101.6M
84.66M
34.64M
4.042M
5.406M
400.0
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.04%
0.78%
0.55%
0.32%
0.13%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.956T
5.230T
3.709T
2.112T
863.0G
579.0G
52.40G
14.45G
13.67G
8.513G
1.842G
269.9M
1.077M
---
0.93%
1.17%
0.50%
0.39%
0.15%
0.20%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.048G
8.887G
3.774G
2.950G
1.116G
1.535G
78.71M
20.23M
160.8M
10.21M
2.570M
718.2k
17.70k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
2.06%
0.11%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.77T
719.2G
428.7G
39.73G
29.18G
7.652G
---
2.18%
0.11%
0.11%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
16.54G
802.8M
835.4M
77.52M
65.25M
8.156M
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
X11
IRC
AFS
Telnet
MS Windows
IDENT
NFS
NTP
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.71%
0.21%
0.15%
0.13%
0.09%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.740T
1.435T
1.001T
838.4G
626.4G
179.7G
172.4G
104.9G
68.39G
53.27G
43.99G
39.04G
29.39G
21.57G
5.574G
2.497G
12.28M
---
1.10%
0.33%
0.15%
0.85%
0.13%
0.05%
0.05%
0.05%
0.11%
0.01%
0.01%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
8.353G
2.507G
1.146G
6.471G
955.0M
380.8M
408.1M
410.5M
818.7M
85.21M
77.06M
512.4M
38.69M
41.85M
46.91M
47.08M
224.5k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.30%
0.06%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.025T
384.1G
371.1G
89.54G
22.78G
15.75G
4.538G
---
0.42%
0.38%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.183G
2.860G
898.4M
189.6M
57.86M
37.85M
9.707M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.46%
---
311.1T
---
48.88%
---
370.0G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
669.8T
---
100.00%
---
757.0G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 310.0G 0.49% 3.673G
IGMP[2]0.00% 190.3M 0.00% 5.013M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 730.1M 0.00% 4.041M
TCP[6]79.21% 530.6T 78.45% 593.9G
UDP[17]8.56% 57.37T 9.69% 73.33G
IPv6[41]0.00% 5.903G 0.00% 18.01M
GRE[47]11.73% 78.54T 10.85% 82.13G
ESP[50]0.26% 1.709T 0.29% 2.226G
AX.25[93]0.00% 582.9k 0.00% 9.500k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.068G 0.01% 44.68M
IPMP[169]0.00% 23.81M 0.00% 330.8k
Other0.20% 1.318T 0.22% 1.680G
Total100.00% 669.8T 100.00% 757.0G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)37.98% 287.5G
Medium (100-1400B)19.99% 151.3G
Large (1401-1500B)38.52% 291.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)3.51% 26.55G
Total100.00% 757.0G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.45% 639.3T 95.28% 721.3G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.46% 3.060T 0.61% 4.626G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 11.76G 0.01% 47.75M
Other4.09% 27.40T 4.10% 31.06G
Total100.00% 669.8T 100.00% 757.0G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.64% 4.300T 0.62% 4.683G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200004.99% 33.40T 3.20% 24.23G
400002.22% 14.88T 1.94% 14.71G
200010.93% 6.255T 0.69% 5.211G
400010.70% 4.668T 0.61% 4.652G
21280.57% 3.846T 0.62% 4.723G