Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070319

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070319 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 12.96% of octets and 0.01% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.374M 5 10.05M
5 1.457M 14 10.43M
10 1.549M 23 10.93M
50 2.795M 58 16.95M
90 9.108M 59 42.25M
95 14.20M 59 58.50M
99 45.86M 59 132.4M
99.9 998.3M 119 3.515G
99.99 1.065G 120 3.758G
99.999 1.689G 124 3.823G
100 259.2G 126 5.096G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.13% 2.660G
Medium (100-1400B)6.23% 7.764G
Large (1401-1500B)86.26% 107.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)5.37% 6.693G
Total100.00% 124.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement27.58% 63.19T 9.24% 11.51G 0.92% 65.41k
Data Transfers19.01% 43.54T 23.98% 29.88G 25.93% 1.839M
Encrypted Traffic8.52% 19.51T 10.43% 13.00G 8.56% 607.0k
File Sharing3.16% 7.228T 4.11% 5.123G 3.16% 224.2k
Advanced Apps3.09% 7.082T 3.85% 4.798G 4.46% 316.5k
Misc0.28% 650.7G 0.37% 466.2M 0.53% 37.93k
Audio/Video0.24% 551.1G 0.30% 379.8M 0.59% 42.15k
Games0.17% 386.4G 0.22% 275.6M 0.28% 19.83k
Unidentified37.95% 86.94T 47.48% 59.17G 55.56% 3.940M
Total100.00% 229.0T 100.00% 124.6G 100.00% 7.093M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.115G900016Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.062G900014Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.032G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
924.8M900012ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
836.6M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
629.4M149928U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]NCSA [1224]Iperf
599.7M150030NCSA [1224]U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]Iperf
397.6M900012Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
348.4M149920Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
323.3M142051UTAH [17055]LLL-TIS [45]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
757.8M130334U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]NCSA [1224]55892 -> 52570
445.6M126754SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]SSH
256.2M150029NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
234.9M150060PSC [1207]U Minnesota [217]SSH
221.6M150030NASA GSFC [1701]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
204.0M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
187.7M150010NOAA [6629]UCAR [194]44153 -> 57234
183.8M142060APNIC [7575]SURFnet [1103]55073 -> 52100
180.3M147917NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
178.1M150060NCSA [1224]U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]37774 -> 56577

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 601.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Measurement9.09% 160.7T 6.02% 74.14T
Data Transfers8.86% 156.6T 0.02% 206.6G
Audio/Video3.82% 67.48T 0.00% 18.68G
Encrypted Traffic1.97% 34.78T 0.03% 381.4G
File Sharing0.98% 17.33T 0.00% 24.08G
Advanced Apps0.79% 14.03T 0.00% 17.13G
Misc0.54% 9.580T 0.00% 22.48G
Games0.16% 2.793T 0.00% 6.918G
Unidentified73.79% 1.304P 93.92% 1.156P
Total100.00% 1.767P 100.00% 1.230P

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
4.69%
4.40%
0.00%
---
82.88T
77.81T
26.21M
---
0.00%
6.02%
0.00%
---
18.57G
74.12T
333.4k
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
7.24%
0.66%
0.56%
0.41%
---
127.9T
11.60T
9.824T
7.332T
---
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
175.0G
11.75G
11.45G
8.350G
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
3.61%
0.17%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
63.90T
2.939T
460.5G
88.01G
67.83G
21.22G
3.349G
602.2M
20.00k
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.00G
3.922G
509.9M
114.7M
90.42M
29.71M
10.85M
1.695M
500.0
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
1.30%
0.58%
0.08%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.97T
10.21T
1.494T
94.70G
6.701G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.34G
19.60G
335.1G
144.6M
179.6M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.30%
0.28%
0.19%
0.13%
0.05%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.312T
4.903T
3.337T
2.210T
898.7G
571.7G
45.08G
25.04G
16.07G
14.20G
1.711G
914.9M
45.52M
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.159G
8.591G
3.421G
2.870G
1.178G
1.544G
71.48M
39.32M
185.0M
21.58M
2.626M
1.439M
67.80k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
0.74%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.03T
596.3G
338.6G
58.74G
6.743G
2.074G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.87G
648.2M
471.3M
88.16M
50.17M
2.391M
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
X11
AFS
IRC
NFS
IDENT
MS Windows
Telnet
NTP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.26%
0.08%
0.08%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.512T
1.502T
1.370T
865.7G
631.3G
192.2G
119.4G
86.82G
83.54G
67.50G
65.46G
37.30G
19.90G
19.06G
5.504G
1.496G
9.604M
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.002G
2.558G
1.463G
6.724G
968.0M
414.8M
320.8M
115.9M
100.7M
828.2M
372.6M
489.9M
41.43M
28.05M
45.51M
11.30M
225.2k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.11%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.953T
372.1G
350.0G
77.35G
18.60G
11.63G
10.75G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.093G
876.4M
2.676G
177.1M
48.72M
27.30M
19.14M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
73.79%
---
1.304P
---
93.92%
---
1.156P
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.767P
---
100.00%
---
1.230P

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]4.40% 77.81T 6.02% 74.12T
IGMP[2]0.00% 58.58G 0.00% 1.465G
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 970.7M 0.00% 10.01M
TCP[6]27.16% 480.1T 0.05% 555.5G
UDP[17]2.94% 51.97T 0.01% 72.18G
IPv6[41]0.00% 7.769G 0.00% 21.84M
GRE[47]2.25% 39.81T 0.00% 40.34G
ESP[50]0.08% 1.494T 0.03% 335.1G
AX.25[93]0.00% 3.370M 0.00% 9.900k
PIM[103]1.75% 30.97T 2.41% 29.68T
IPMP[169]0.00% 26.21M 0.00% 333.4k
Other61.41% 1.085P 91.48% 1.126P
Total100.00% 1.767P 100.00% 1.230P

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)99.96% 1.230P
Medium (100-1400B)0.02% 275.6G
Large (1401-1500B)0.02% 248.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 15.40G
Total100.00% 1.230P

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]65.27% 1.153P 43.33% 533.3T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]4.91% 86.85T 6.03% 74.17T
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 12.55G 0.00% 57.73M
Other29.82% 527.1T 50.64% 623.3T
Total100.00% 1.767P 100.00% 1.230P

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable23.84% 421.5T 32.94% 405.4T

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
5072010.79% 190.7T 2.12% 26.08T
829.46% 167.1T 6.37% 78.46T
18.11% 143.3T 13.55% 166.7T
448.08% 142.8T 13.32% 163.9T
2057.07% 125.0T 0.05% 565.4G