Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070312

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070312 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/3 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 45.41% of octets and 21.66% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.379M 4 10.05M
5 1.470M 12 10.50M
10 1.577M 18 10.95M
50 3.032M 58 17.85M
90 11.37M 59 50.48M
95 17.92M 59 71.00M
99 63.50M 59 187.5M
99.9 1.002G 119 3.618G
99.99 1.073G 119 3.765G
99.999 1.500G 122 3.824G
100 252.0G 123 3.906G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.98% 4.346G
Medium (100-1400B)5.49% 5.997G
Large (1401-1500B)84.84% 92.71G
Jumbo (>1500B)5.70% 6.225G
Total100.00% 109.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement34.25% 68.66T 18.16% 19.85G 1.41% 72.87k
Data Transfers16.06% 32.18T 20.29% 22.17G 26.17% 1.354M
Encrypted Traffic8.00% 16.03T 9.43% 10.30G 9.93% 514.0k
Advanced Apps3.65% 7.321T 4.52% 4.941G 6.15% 318.3k
File Sharing3.32% 6.660T 4.23% 4.618G 3.82% 197.6k
Misc0.23% 465.9G 0.31% 335.3M 0.56% 29.04k
Audio/Video0.22% 432.7G 0.27% 298.2M 0.64% 33.11k
Games0.15% 304.8G 0.20% 219.9M 0.33% 16.85k
Unidentified34.11% 68.38T 42.58% 46.53G 51.00% 2.640M
Total100.00% 200.4T 100.00% 109.2G 100.00% 5.176M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.096G900026Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
960.0M150010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
883.7M150019Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
679.6M150013ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
667.0M150015SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
473.2M142060UTAH [17055]LLL-TIS [45]Iperf
343.8M149916Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
283.3M150010Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
234.8M150019Unknown [32361]GARR [137]Iperf
205.7M150030NCSA [1224]U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
259.0M150020Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
240.7M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
205.9M147930NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
192.1M150014NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
171.9M150010INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]52992 -> 44717
168.7M150060NCSA [1224]Unknown [27274]44267 -> 36690
160.1M150011NCSA [1224]U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]35709 -> 49284
158.6M150010U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]NCSA [1224]34074 -> 47873
152.5M150018NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
141.5M150021UCLA [52]U Oregon [3582]49004 -> 1345

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 425.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers23.49% 103.6T 26.64% 134.4G
Measurement20.65% 91.16T 6.77% 34.16G
Encrypted Traffic5.88% 25.93T 6.71% 33.84G
Advanced Apps3.30% 14.55T 3.55% 17.93G
File Sharing3.25% 14.35T 3.77% 19.03G
Audio/Video3.09% 13.64T 3.01% 15.20G
Misc1.62% 7.134T 3.51% 17.69G
Games0.42% 1.859T 0.85% 4.302G
Unidentified38.31% 169.0T 45.18% 228.0G
Total100.00% 441.4T 100.00% 504.6G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
NNTP
Rsync
---
17.96%
2.36%
1.83%
1.33%
---
79.27T
10.40T
8.098T
5.884T
---
21.24%
2.24%
1.71%
1.45%
---
107.1G
11.31G
8.618G
7.310G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
20.00%
1.53%
0.00%
---
88.27T
6.740T
51.74M
---
5.39%
3.22%
0.00%
---
27.19G
16.25G
718.6k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.30%
1.36%
0.20%
0.02%
0.00%
---
18.96T
6.007T
891.3G
72.43G
1.270G
---
4.26%
2.16%
0.27%
0.02%
0.00%
---
21.47G
10.89G
1.353G
115.5M
6.884M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
3.13%
0.15%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.82T
650.9G
50.57G
27.12G
5.018G
388.0M
---
3.33%
0.14%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
16.79G
705.1M
329.1M
54.91M
47.38M
631.1k
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.09%
0.80%
0.78%
0.33%
0.18%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.798T
3.551T
3.427T
1.452T
785.7G
264.2G
34.18G
13.72G
10.51G
8.485G
2.818G
128.8M
28.30M
---
1.09%
1.24%
0.69%
0.38%
0.20%
0.13%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.504G
6.280G
3.500G
1.899G
998.7M
667.5M
50.94M
23.24M
11.89M
96.48M
5.170M
540.1k
59.03k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
2.48%
0.48%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.93T
2.122T
454.6G
60.88G
52.69G
12.64G
3.064G
971.4M
18.66k
---
2.25%
0.63%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.37G
3.166G
486.9M
72.94M
73.15M
20.31M
8.561M
2.475M
466.0
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
AFS
NFS
IRC
Telnet
MS Windows
NTP
IDENT
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.67%
0.34%
0.16%
0.13%
0.11%
0.11%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.943T
1.502T
712.2G
568.7G
501.0G
490.8G
150.7G
69.33G
44.39G
42.60G
35.09G
32.38G
18.52G
16.14G
5.506G
779.4M
8.599M
---
1.13%
0.49%
1.11%
0.14%
0.15%
0.12%
0.03%
0.05%
0.07%
0.09%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.689G
2.495G
5.587G
698.8M
774.0M
623.2M
158.9M
230.2M
335.0M
474.7M
460.9M
52.27M
35.21M
20.70M
44.63M
16.07M
210.9k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
Spy Arcade
---
0.31%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.379T
213.6G
196.4G
45.68G
13.74G
7.048G
3.154G
---
0.42%
0.11%
0.30%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.094G
555.2M
1.499G
100.1M
22.50M
22.46M
7.638M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
38.31%
---
169.0T
---
45.18%
---
228.0G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
441.4T
---
100.00%
---
504.6G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]1.53% 6.740T 3.22% 16.25G
IGMP[2]0.00% 136.5M 0.00% 3.161M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 412.0M 0.00% 1.873M
TCP[6]86.92% 383.6T 84.81% 427.9G
UDP[17]9.97% 44.01T 11.44% 57.72G
IPv6[41]0.00% 14.26G 0.00% 24.77M
GRE[47]1.95% 8.608T 1.75% 8.853G
ESP[50]0.20% 891.3G 0.27% 1.353G
AX.25[93]0.00% 24.03k 0.00% 466.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.028G 0.01% 43.40M
IPMP[169]0.00% 51.74M 0.00% 718.6k
Other0.30% 1.317T 0.33% 1.670G
Total100.00% 441.4T 100.00% 504.6G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.95% 201.5G
Medium (100-1400B)21.49% 108.4G
Large (1401-1500B)36.87% 186.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.69% 8.550G
Total100.00% 504.6G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.36% 416.5T 94.29% 475.8G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.26% 1.168T 0.36% 1.819G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 7.329G 0.01% 26.82M
Other5.37% 23.70T 5.34% 26.95G
Total100.00% 441.4T 100.00% 504.6G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.89% 3.926T 0.85% 4.265G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
500020.76% 3.358T 0.46% 2.332G
400000.52% 2.295T 0.45% 2.264G
200000.33% 1.451T 0.36% 1.794G
21280.32% 1.406T 0.35% 1.762G
191010.29% 1.266T 0.26% 1.319G