Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070212

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070212 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 43.17% of octets and 19.32% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.384M 4 10.05M
5 1.474M 12 10.50M
10 1.582M 18 10.95M
50 2.945M 58 17.45M
90 10.92M 59 44.85M
95 18.71M 59 66.21M
99 58.03M 59 170.8M
99.9 1.002G 114 3.606G
99.99 1.085G 119 3.764G
99.999 2.062G 121 3.829G
100 252.0G 159 5.571G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)4.62% 7.368G
Medium (100-1400B)7.40% 11.80G
Large (1401-1500B)81.96% 130.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)6.01% 9.584G
Total100.00% 159.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement32.01% 94.05T 11.86% 18.90G 1.14% 92.05k
Data Transfers16.66% 48.96T 22.69% 36.17G 27.46% 2.226M
Encrypted Traffic11.65% 34.24T 14.77% 23.54G 10.18% 825.6k
Advanced Apps3.91% 11.50T 4.87% 7.763G 6.51% 527.4k
File Sharing3.86% 11.33T 5.03% 8.020G 3.80% 308.2k
Misc0.25% 735.8G 0.33% 530.6M 0.58% 47.31k
Games0.22% 636.8G 0.28% 452.4M 0.41% 32.89k
Audio/Video0.20% 597.9G 0.27% 423.3M 0.57% 46.23k
Unidentified31.23% 91.77T 39.90% 63.61G 49.35% 4.000M
Total100.00% 293.8T 100.00% 159.4G 100.00% 8.106M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.142G900016Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
987.5M900029Abilene [11537]SDSC [195]Iperf
972.9M150010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
885.5M150015Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
877.3M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
666.2M150013ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
348.3M149923NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
336.0M150011UTAH [17055]CMU [9]Iperf
300.4M150013Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
297.0M142059UTAH [17055]LLL-TIS [45]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
773.1M900058NCSA [1224]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]38144 -> 5150
701.0M900048Argonne [683]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]48760 -> 5150
477.9M150010Abilene [11537]NASA-AERONET [10343]3003 -> 50561
333.7M148210NASA-AERONET [10343]Abilene [11537]49753 -> 3002
261.6M150019Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
261.1M150012PSC [1207]U Minnesota [217]SSH
259.9M150015NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
252.4M147912NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
249.4M150024Indiana [87]Unknown [0]HTTP
247.1M150029EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]NASA GSFC [1701]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 662.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers26.02% 177.1T 28.23% 232.9G
Measurement18.25% 124.1T 5.21% 42.95G
Encrypted Traffic7.74% 52.69T 8.33% 68.77G
File Sharing5.56% 37.83T 7.15% 59.01G
Advanced Apps3.20% 21.77T 3.39% 28.00G
Audio/Video2.64% 17.98T 2.15% 17.70G
Misc1.76% 12.01T 3.75% 30.95G
Games0.56% 3.791T 1.16% 9.600G
Unidentified34.27% 233.2T 40.63% 335.2G
Total100.00% 680.6T 100.00% 825.1G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
21.07%
2.05%
1.84%
1.07%
---
143.3T
13.96T
12.52T
7.250T
---
23.55%
1.79%
1.84%
1.04%
---
194.3G
14.78G
15.16G
8.588G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
18.06%
0.19%
0.00%
---
122.8T
1.283T
36.00M
---
3.39%
1.82%
0.00%
---
27.93G
15.01G
500.0k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
5.55%
1.96%
0.22%
0.02%
0.00%
---
37.74T
13.32T
1.496T
124.9G
2.064G
---
4.86%
3.23%
0.22%
0.02%
0.00%
---
40.12G
26.62G
1.816G
193.5M
9.851M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
Audiogalaxy
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Carracho
WinMX
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
2.18%
1.19%
1.01%
0.87%
0.15%
0.14%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.86T
8.068T
6.874T
5.945T
1.001T
936.2G
79.56G
26.39G
16.41G
15.49G
6.513G
1.509G
366.4k
---
3.48%
1.53%
0.80%
0.85%
0.16%
0.29%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.69G
12.64G
6.633G
6.978G
1.322G
2.373G
114.1M
28.97M
27.79M
184.5M
10.03M
2.373M
7.800k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
2.93%
0.17%
0.09%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.90T
1.172T
610.6G
30.06G
26.96G
21.74G
---
3.07%
0.15%
0.15%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
25.35G
1.244G
1.233G
62.09M
27.17M
84.07M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
2.09%
0.42%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.24T
2.861T
662.8G
109.0G
84.00G
20.28G
7.368G
695.2M
40.90k
---
1.55%
0.47%
0.09%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.82G
3.845G
723.2M
145.2M
114.9M
35.33M
15.60M
2.900M
1.000k
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
X11
AFS
Telnet
IRC
MS Windows
NFS
AOL AIM
NTP
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.83%
0.27%
0.21%
0.18%
0.15%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.652T
1.868T
1.452T
1.236T
994.2G
288.2G
107.6G
94.51G
70.60G
70.29G
54.54G
41.75G
36.29G
34.83G
9.126G
168.1M
18.40M
---
1.17%
0.41%
0.20%
1.43%
0.19%
0.08%
0.04%
0.04%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.613G
3.392G
1.612G
11.78G
1.550G
637.3M
338.1M
349.6M
726.7M
120.0M
70.14M
548.6M
70.92M
64.20M
71.22M
2.382M
468.6k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.39%
0.08%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.629T
528.3G
404.0G
140.5G
57.27G
22.62G
8.405G
---
0.51%
0.48%
0.12%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
4.201G
3.994G
964.4M
291.5M
88.06M
46.27M
14.43M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
34.27%
---
233.2T
---
40.63%
---
335.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
680.6T
---
100.00%
---
825.1G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.19% 1.283T 1.82% 15.01G
IGMP[2]0.00% 115.7M 0.00% 2.811M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 187.9M 0.00% 2.175M
TCP[6]87.44% 595.1T 82.65% 681.9G
UDP[17]11.55% 78.58T 14.66% 120.9G
IPv6[41]0.00% 8.020G 0.00% 26.53M
GRE[47]0.59% 4.008T 0.62% 5.148G
ESP[50]0.22% 1.496T 0.22% 1.816G
AX.25[93]0.00% 1.686M 0.00% 25.30k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.151G 0.01% 43.07M
IPMP[169]0.00% 36.00M 0.00% 500.0k
Other0.02% 127.0G 0.02% 203.5M
Total100.00% 680.6T 100.00% 825.1G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.53% 342.6G
Medium (100-1400B)23.60% 194.7G
Large (1401-1500B)33.31% 274.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.56% 12.90G
Total100.00% 825.1G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]92.99% 632.8T 93.80% 773.9G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]1.18% 8.040T 1.03% 8.533G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 20.68G 0.01% 93.18M
Other5.83% 39.68T 5.15% 42.51G
Total100.00% 680.6T 100.00% 825.1G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.32% 2.187T 0.20% 1.677G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200001.16% 7.877T 0.96% 7.884G
163840.67% 4.589T 0.58% 4.816G
191010.60% 4.095T 0.55% 4.504G
200010.54% 3.696T 0.45% 3.723G
21280.52% 3.562T 0.55% 4.571G