Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070205

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070205 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 29.76% of octets and 0.06% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.378M 4 10.05M
5 1.456M 11 10.36M
10 1.546M 19 10.81M
50 2.748M 58 16.64M
90 10.81M 59 44.55M
95 18.05M 59 62.40M
99 74.45M 59 160.0M
99.9 1.000G 118 3.593G
99.99 1.073G 119 3.762G
99.999 1.732G 120 3.826G
100 252.0G 122 5.305G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)12.58% 20.03G
Medium (100-1400B)7.35% 11.70G
Large (1401-1500B)74.70% 118.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)5.37% 8.555G
Total100.00% 159.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement30.84% 82.76T 10.20% 16.24G 1.05% 80.50k
Data Transfers16.71% 44.82T 27.72% 44.14G 25.33% 1.942M
Encrypted Traffic7.79% 20.90T 8.91% 14.19G 7.25% 556.0k
File Sharing3.80% 10.20T 4.65% 7.401G 3.77% 289.0k
Advanced Apps3.74% 10.03T 4.25% 6.763G 5.89% 451.6k
Misc0.22% 588.6G 0.27% 431.9M 0.50% 38.25k
Games0.21% 574.0G 0.26% 411.5M 0.35% 27.10k
Audio/Video0.19% 513.7G 0.22% 354.1M 0.50% 38.01k
Unidentified36.49% 97.92T 43.53% 69.33G 55.35% 4.243M
Total100.00% 268.3T 100.00% 159.2G 100.00% 7.666M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.174G900013Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
966.0M150010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]Iperf
898.3M150013SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
890.7M150015SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]Iperf
882.4M150015Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
652.0M150011ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
505.9M900010Unknown [0]Abilene [11537]Iperf
450.2M144010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
354.6M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
351.5M150019UCLA [52]Australia [4730]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
500.1M150060CalTech [31]CERN [513]52788 -> 5016
343.4M147112APNIC [7575]Unknown [13041]HTTP
317.4M150013Unknown [36859]Argonne [683]32907 -> 3002
310.6M148210NASA-AERONET [10343]Abilene [11537]49800 -> 3002
294.1M150010Unknown [0]UC Santa Cruz [5739]40667 -> 3002
289.7M150011Abilene [11537]NASA-AERONET [10343]3003 -> 49801
259.7M150027EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]NASA GSFC [1701]Hotline
257.9M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
256.4M150025INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]38673 -> 44065
250.3M150050UTAH [17055]CMU [9]61050 -> 9999

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 631.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers15.91% 143.4T 0.07% 198.4G
Measurement12.41% 111.9T 0.61% 1.643T
Encrypted Traffic3.96% 35.72T 0.02% 51.75G
File Sharing3.78% 34.06T 0.02% 53.35G
Advanced Apps2.05% 18.44T 0.01% 23.89G
Audio/Video2.02% 18.21T 0.01% 17.55G
Misc1.05% 9.450T 0.01% 22.47G
Games0.35% 3.200T 0.00% 8.187G
Unidentified58.47% 527.2T 99.25% 267.7T
Total100.00% 901.6T 100.00% 269.7T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
12.29%
1.57%
1.22%
0.82%
---
110.8T
14.17T
11.00T
7.418T
---
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
162.5G
14.22G
13.51G
8.157G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
12.16%
0.25%
0.00%
---
109.6T
2.268T
27.18M
---
0.01%
0.60%
0.00%
---
24.54G
1.619T
377.6k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.59%
1.27%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.33T
11.41T
841.0G
119.2G
6.498G
---
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.76G
22.28G
1.410G
167.6M
127.5M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Gnutella
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.62%
0.72%
0.68%
0.57%
0.09%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.64T
6.504T
6.103T
5.122T
801.4G
788.6G
53.38G
15.87G
15.64G
11.64G
3.203G
1.978G
627.2k
---
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.86G
7.340G
9.700G
5.015G
2.029G
1.087G
85.26M
28.50M
183.9M
13.80M
5.293M
2.419M
3.800k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.90%
0.11%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.16T
1.000T
228.8G
29.90G
13.82G
3.567G
---
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.15G
1.060G
535.4M
64.37M
72.23M
5.512M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Backbone Radio
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.69%
0.25%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.26T
2.263T
496.7G
90.28G
55.22G
45.89G
2.978G
437.8M
10.70k
---
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.68G
3.070G
537.8M
125.8M
64.84M
62.26M
7.256M
1.683M
200.0
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
X11
AFS
IRC
Telnet
MS Windows
NFS
AOL AIM
NTP
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.50%
0.17%
0.12%
0.10%
0.07%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.484T
1.513T
1.122T
895.1G
675.5G
364.4G
71.92G
63.47G
56.05G
49.61G
38.18G
36.40G
36.25G
35.25G
7.388G
416.6M
10.71M
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.654G
2.827G
1.249G
7.135G
1.086G
560.5M
297.2M
251.3M
577.2M
87.35M
52.54M
478.2M
69.12M
78.52M
59.89M
7.858M
261.3k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.24%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.187T
471.5G
346.9G
103.6G
62.94G
16.63G
11.41G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.503G
3.540G
791.7M
202.7M
97.17M
33.19M
18.63M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
58.47%
---
527.2T
---
99.25%
---
267.7T
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
901.6T
---
100.00%
---
269.7T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.25% 2.268T 0.60% 1.619T
IGMP[2]0.00% 3.014G 0.15% 397.2G
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 1.873G 0.00% 25.55M
TCP[6]57.58% 519.2T 0.22% 596.6G
UDP[17]8.08% 72.89T 0.04% 101.8G
IPv6[41]0.00% 17.57G 0.00% 31.27M
GRE[47]4.58% 41.28T 0.02% 41.87G
ESP[50]0.09% 841.0G 0.00% 1.410G
AX.25[93]0.00% 687.6k 0.00% 7.200k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.740G 0.00% 38.13M
IPMP[169]0.00% 27.18M 0.00% 377.6k
Other29.41% 265.1T 98.98% 267.0T
Total100.00% 901.6T 100.00% 269.7T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)99.83% 269.3T
Medium (100-1400B)0.06% 172.9G
Large (1401-1500B)0.10% 260.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.01% 15.36G
Total100.00% 269.7T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.34% 868.6T 97.81% 263.8T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.41% 3.721T 0.00% 4.968G
EF [DSCP=46]0.16% 1.409T 0.48% 1.286T
Other3.09% 27.90T 1.72% 4.628T
Total100.00% 901.6T 100.00% 269.7T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable29.61% 266.9T 98.75% 266.4T

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
378029.10% 262.3T 97.76% 263.7T
44329.08% 262.1T 97.72% 263.6T
200001.07% 9.607T 0.00% 9.364G
200010.66% 5.993T 0.00% 6.043G
200020.51% 4.595T 0.00% 4.684G