Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070122

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070122 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 41.37% of octets and 19.36% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.376M 4 10.05M
5 1.460M 10 10.47M
10 1.558M 19 10.95M
50 2.898M 58 17.40M
90 11.23M 59 50.25M
95 23.06M 59 66.66M
99 73.79M 59 172.6M
99.9 1.004G 119 3.630G
99.99 1.092G 120 3.772G
99.999 2.482G 122 3.861G
100 266.4G 129 5.450G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)4.24% 5.367G
Medium (100-1400B)9.49% 12.01G
Large (1401-1500B)80.07% 101.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)6.21% 7.865G
Total100.00% 126.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement33.39% 78.78T 13.00% 16.46G 1.21% 76.02k
Data Transfers18.22% 42.97T 24.44% 30.96G 29.07% 1.822M
Encrypted Traffic8.06% 19.01T 10.45% 13.23G 8.40% 526.5k
Advanced Apps3.85% 9.074T 4.83% 6.123G 6.68% 418.5k
File Sharing3.34% 7.878T 4.37% 5.539G 3.57% 223.8k
Misc0.26% 620.6G 0.35% 445.4M 0.62% 38.98k
Games0.26% 617.8G 0.36% 450.4M 0.52% 32.61k
Audio/Video0.18% 421.5G 0.23% 294.8M 0.53% 33.30k
Unidentified32.44% 76.54T 41.97% 53.16G 49.40% 3.096M
Total100.00% 235.9T 100.00% 126.6G 100.00% 6.268M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.097G900012Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
937.2M900010Abilene [11537]SDSC [195]Iperf
926.3M150022Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
910.1M150018SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
726.9M150060PUNET Technology Ltd.,Taiwan [9270]MIEN1 [11442]Iperf
652.5M150015ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
347.3M150017NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
284.3M150017Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
243.6M150018NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf
149.3M137127NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
533.3M150060CalTech [31]CERN [513]55768 -> 5016
466.4M150033PSC [1207]NCSA [1224]5129 -> 5129
328.7M148010NASA-AERONET [10343]Abilene [11537]50207 -> 3002
300.7M150011Abilene [11537]NASA-AERONET [10343]3003 -> 50112
282.1M150030PSC [1207]TACCNET [32093]5131 -> 5131
258.6M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
249.5M147919NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
221.2M150031PSC [1207]U Minnesota [217]SSH
219.8M150020Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
189.8M150012NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 518.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers21.62% 123.2T 24.88% 162.7G
Measurement18.71% 106.7T 4.26% 27.87G
Encrypted Traffic5.60% 31.94T 6.63% 43.37G
File Sharing5.15% 29.38T 7.18% 46.96G
Audio/Video4.08% 23.27T 3.31% 21.67G
Advanced Apps3.19% 18.16T 3.60% 23.57G
Misc1.79% 10.21T 3.62% 23.65G
Games0.61% 3.481T 1.22% 7.984G
Unidentified39.25% 223.8T 45.30% 296.3G
Total100.00% 570.3T 100.00% 654.2G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
14.99%
3.24%
2.07%
1.32%
---
85.49T
18.46T
11.80T
7.529T
---
18.74%
2.79%
2.11%
1.24%
---
122.6G
18.27G
13.78G
8.101G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
18.67%
0.04%
0.00%
---
106.4T
249.4G
50.44M
---
3.78%
0.48%
0.00%
---
24.70G
3.164G
520.4k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.80%
1.57%
0.18%
0.04%
0.01%
---
21.67T
8.954T
1.037T
229.6G
53.39G
---
3.70%
2.47%
0.24%
0.04%
0.19%
---
24.17G
16.13G
1.566G
279.5M
1.218G
File Sharing
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
2.32%
1.01%
0.82%
0.73%
0.15%
0.12%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.21T
5.736T
4.648T
4.147T
865.3G
672.9G
49.28G
22.00G
14.53G
10.87G
4.013G
641.1M
397.5k
---
3.89%
1.39%
0.80%
0.63%
0.18%
0.26%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.44G
9.061G
5.228G
4.097G
1.178G
1.689G
77.64M
31.67M
17.11M
120.4M
6.554M
1.223M
7.800k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
3.64%
0.34%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.77T
1.927T
415.9G
69.95G
62.43G
23.25G
3.912G
577.1M
23.20k
---
2.81%
0.39%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.40G
2.582G
453.9M
106.1M
78.59M
34.45M
9.292M
2.397M
600.0
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
3.00%
0.12%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.12T
711.8G
276.9G
30.93G
13.11G
8.784G
---
3.43%
0.12%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.42G
777.6M
246.7M
57.34M
66.06M
8.842M
Misc
Mail
Squid
X11
Port 0
DNS
AFS
Telnet
MS Windows
NFS
IDENT
AOL AIM
IRC
NTP
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.75%
0.34%
0.21%
0.21%
0.16%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.274T
1.932T
1.191T
1.171T
891.8G
318.4G
74.07G
67.23G
60.17G
50.53G
49.35G
49.28G
41.71G
29.64G
7.126G
188.1M
8.686M
---
1.08%
0.49%
0.25%
0.19%
1.18%
0.08%
0.06%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.04%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.089G
3.238G
1.605G
1.224G
7.739G
537.0M
396.0M
658.4M
99.12M
79.18M
67.86M
234.8M
548.0M
73.53M
56.94M
2.612M
197.0k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.43%
0.07%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.457T
403.1G
401.9G
110.2G
76.21G
25.99G
5.794G
---
0.58%
0.46%
0.12%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.819G
3.012G
800.5M
182.8M
118.0M
38.96M
12.46M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.25%
---
223.8T
---
45.30%
---
296.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
570.3T
---
100.00%
---
654.2G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 249.4G 0.48% 3.164G
IGMP[2]0.00% 142.4M 0.00% 2.944M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 1.282G 0.00% 9.598M
TCP[6]79.87% 455.4T 78.59% 514.1G
UDP[17]13.52% 77.10T 15.35% 100.4G
IPv6[41]0.00% 15.13G 0.01% 39.67M
GRE[47]6.34% 36.18T 5.28% 34.55G
ESP[50]0.18% 1.037T 0.24% 1.566G
AX.25[93]0.00% 14.97M 0.00% 17.00k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.004G 0.01% 39.08M
IPMP[169]0.00% 50.44M 0.00% 520.4k
Other0.04% 235.1G 0.04% 287.5M
Total100.00% 570.3T 100.00% 654.2G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.79% 253.7G
Medium (100-1400B)25.52% 166.9G
Large (1401-1500B)32.40% 211.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)3.29% 21.55G
Total100.00% 654.2G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.31% 543.5T 95.55% 625.1G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.50% 2.831T 0.58% 3.791G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 13.15G 0.01% 48.58M
Other4.20% 23.92T 3.86% 25.26G
Total100.00% 570.3T 100.00% 654.2G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.44% 2.485T 0.27% 1.778G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200001.12% 6.393T 0.98% 6.407G
163840.74% 4.203T 0.68% 4.462G
191010.53% 3.048T 0.51% 3.360G
21280.52% 2.991T 0.61% 3.992G
200010.51% 2.889T 0.45% 2.945G