Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070108

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070108 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 46.45% of octets and 21.95% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.378M 3 10.05M
5 1.472M 10 10.50M
10 1.588M 17 11.01M
50 3.102M 58 18.00M
90 11.91M 59 45.00M
95 20.23M 59 61.51M
99 77.25M 59 197.5M
99.9 1.006G 119 3.641G
99.99 1.107G 120 3.777G
99.999 4.020G 125 5.440G
100 266.4G 139 30.25G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)4.12% 4.603G
Medium (100-1400B)6.97% 7.793G
Large (1401-1500B)82.22% 91.96G
Jumbo (>1500B)6.70% 7.492G
Total100.00% 111.8G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement34.51% 73.33T 12.91% 14.44G 1.24% 69.38k
Data Transfers16.57% 35.22T 22.83% 25.54G 27.02% 1.514M
Encrypted Traffic7.40% 15.73T 9.81% 10.97G 8.70% 487.6k
Advanced Apps4.10% 8.714T 5.26% 5.882G 7.36% 412.4k
File Sharing3.17% 6.728T 4.21% 4.706G 3.41% 191.2k
Misc0.28% 601.3G 0.38% 427.2M 0.67% 37.63k
Games0.22% 461.0G 0.29% 325.2M 0.40% 22.43k
Audio/Video0.19% 395.0G 0.24% 273.1M 0.54% 30.17k
Unidentified33.56% 71.31T 44.06% 49.28G 50.65% 2.837M
Total100.00% 212.5T 100.00% 111.8G 100.00% 5.602M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.532G900015APAN-JP [7660]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]Iperf
1.107G900019Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
971.1M150013Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
894.5M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
547.8M150019ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
346.7M149910NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
285.8M150013Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
283.3M150012Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf
147.4M137721NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
103.5M150015CERN [513]U Florida [6356]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
467.6M150014Pennsylvania State U [3999]UW-Milwaukee [7050]42766 -> 44000
292.1M150021Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
253.3M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
247.5M147520NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
192.0M150024NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
187.6M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
177.0M150056PSC [1207]U Minnesota [217]SSH
173.2M150019TACCNET [32093]PSC [1207]42628 -> 50001
169.2M150021Rutgers [46]SDSC [195]8730 -> 33126
150.8M150024Indiana [87]OSU [159]49757 -> 57841

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 453.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Measurement21.79% 99.70T 4.93% 25.09G
Data Transfers21.36% 97.69T 25.78% 131.3G
Encrypted Traffic5.50% 25.17T 6.69% 34.08G
File Sharing4.89% 22.38T 7.00% 35.66G
Advanced Apps3.86% 17.67T 4.50% 22.91G
Audio/Video3.04% 13.92T 2.63% 13.41G
Misc1.91% 8.730T 3.97% 20.24G
Games0.49% 2.234T 0.86% 4.379G
Unidentified37.15% 169.9T 43.64% 222.3G
Total100.00% 457.4T 100.00% 509.5G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
21.72%
0.07%
0.00%
---
99.38T
318.3G
19.60M
---
4.23%
0.69%
0.00%
---
21.57G
3.527G
272.3k
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
15.18%
2.49%
2.27%
1.41%
---
69.45T
11.39T
10.39T
6.449T
---
19.68%
2.25%
2.45%
1.40%
---
100.2G
11.45G
12.48G
7.137G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.97%
1.37%
0.15%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.15T
6.260T
691.3G
50.27G
11.74G
---
4.22%
2.15%
0.23%
0.02%
0.07%
---
21.51G
10.93G
1.177G
98.84M
364.2M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Direct Connect++
Neo-Modus
---
2.23%
0.91%
0.80%
0.68%
0.18%
0.08%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.19T
4.153T
3.642T
3.129T
831.7G
373.8G
29.92G
12.06G
10.65G
8.139G
1.252G
136.8M
90.99M
---
3.99%
0.89%
0.71%
0.97%
0.22%
0.17%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.32G
4.557G
3.631G
4.967G
1.129G
862.5M
46.83M
19.80M
112.1M
9.401M
1.713M
150.8k
213.5k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
BBCP
IBP
---
3.72%
0.14%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.01T
622.5G
22.91G
8.314G
3.159G
368.5M
---
4.34%
0.13%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.12G
673.4M
49.91M
62.74M
5.040M
884.0k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
2.59%
0.35%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.87T
1.598T
319.2G
63.05G
49.22G
20.75G
2.034G
176.7M
14.70k
---
2.11%
0.42%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.76G
2.119G
348.4M
85.96M
64.23M
27.99M
6.319M
898.4k
300.0
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
X11
DNS
AFS
Telnet
MS Windows
IDENT
NFS
IRC
NTP
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.77%
0.37%
0.29%
0.20%
0.19%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.508T
1.703T
1.345T
922.2G
857.5G
93.30G
55.71G
49.86G
44.31G
42.40G
36.45G
30.84G
16.98G
16.66G
6.256G
174.3M
30.10M
---
1.16%
0.55%
0.23%
0.25%
1.38%
0.06%
0.06%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.04%
0.08%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.917G
2.812G
1.194G
1.287G
7.031G
296.6M
312.8M
534.7M
67.81M
70.72M
202.3M
405.0M
22.39M
35.78M
49.28M
2.111M
163.6k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.37%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.680T
274.8G
162.6G
62.26G
25.07G
18.44G
10.34G
---
0.49%
0.10%
0.24%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.479G
496.7M
1.200G
116.1M
28.54M
40.10M
18.07M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
37.15%
---
169.9T
---
43.64%
---
222.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
457.4T
---
100.00%
---
509.5G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 318.3G 0.69% 3.527G
IGMP[2]0.00% 95.84M 0.00% 2.361M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 2.306G 0.00% 14.96M
TCP[6]84.40% 386.1T 82.44% 420.0G
UDP[17]12.92% 59.10T 14.26% 72.67G
IPv6[41]0.00% 6.547G 0.01% 28.14M
GRE[47]2.44% 11.16T 2.34% 11.89G
ESP[50]0.15% 691.3G 0.23% 1.177G
AX.25[93]0.00% 274.0k 0.00% 6.100k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.068G 0.01% 37.84M
IPMP[169]0.00% 19.60M 0.00% 272.3k
Other0.01% 51.21G 0.02% 105.4M
Total100.00% 457.4T 100.00% 509.5G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.40% 200.7G
Medium (100-1400B)22.73% 115.8G
Large (1401-1500B)34.66% 176.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)3.20% 16.31G
Total100.00% 509.5G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.10% 435.0T 95.13% 484.7G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.29% 1.316T 0.35% 1.799G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 14.96G 0.01% 62.29M
Other4.61% 21.07T 4.50% 22.93G
Total100.00% 457.4T 100.00% 509.5G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.61% 2.797T 0.38% 1.928G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200001.65% 7.558T 1.40% 7.138G
200010.80% 3.643T 0.68% 3.480G
21280.52% 2.387T 0.64% 3.254G
191010.44% 1.994T 0.42% 2.124G
200020.41% 1.871T 0.35% 1.804G