Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20070101

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20070101 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.96% of octets and 20.13% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.377M 4 10.05M
5 1.470M 9 10.50M
10 1.583M 14 10.98M
50 3.184M 58 18.50M
90 15.49M 59 53.10M
95 28.19M 59 72.00M
99 77.01M 59 322.7M
99.9 1.010G 119 3.668G
99.99 1.113G 119 3.780G
99.999 2.227G 120 3.837G
100 266.4G 122 3.954G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.85% 3.662G
Medium (100-1400B)7.28% 6.934G
Large (1401-1500B)81.10% 77.25G
Jumbo (>1500B)7.77% 7.403G
Total100.00% 95.25G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement39.23% 74.31T 16.57% 15.78G 1.65% 70.53k
Data Transfers16.81% 31.84T 23.13% 22.02G 31.38% 1.342M
Encrypted Traffic6.47% 12.24T 8.86% 8.436G 8.65% 369.8k
Advanced Apps4.32% 8.175T 5.80% 5.527G 9.33% 399.0k
File Sharing3.11% 5.890T 4.34% 4.134G 3.19% 136.2k
Misc0.39% 745.5G 0.55% 519.3M 1.05% 44.91k
Games0.14% 271.2G 0.20% 190.0M 0.28% 11.88k
Audio/Video0.14% 261.0G 0.19% 180.4M 0.47% 19.96k
Unidentified29.39% 55.66T 40.37% 38.45G 44.01% 1.882M
Total100.00% 189.4T 100.00% 95.25G 100.00% 4.277M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.195G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
980.9M150016Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
942.2M824410UCB [25]Abilene [11537]Iperf
913.7M150016SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
902.6M150014ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
342.8M150020NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
333.2M150015Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf
284.0M150011Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
161.0M149410NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Abilene [11537]Iperf
151.7M138229NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
270.7M150029NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
247.8M147929NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
189.8M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
180.2M150025NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
178.0M150020PSC [1207]U Minnesota [217]SSH
176.6M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
138.3M150060Indiana [87]Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Rsync
131.5M150060NASA-AERONET [10343]MIT [3]19010 -> 31313
125.7M150030NASA GSFC [1701]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
122.0M150048CalTech [31]CERN [513]42173 -> 5016

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 342.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Measurement21.85% 101.0T 6.01% 28.45G
Data Transfers16.79% 77.64T 21.05% 99.62G
Encrypted Traffic4.16% 19.21T 5.38% 25.46G
Advanced Apps3.69% 17.08T 4.74% 22.45G
Audio/Video2.81% 13.01T 2.54% 12.02G
File Sharing2.19% 10.12T 2.60% 12.30G
Misc1.49% 6.891T 3.38% 16.01G
Games0.30% 1.366T 0.50% 2.351G
Unidentified46.72% 216.0T 53.79% 254.5G
Total100.00% 462.4T 100.00% 473.2G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
21.75%
0.10%
0.00%
---
100.5T
470.7G
16.86M
---
4.90%
1.11%
0.00%
---
23.20G
5.257G
224.4k
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
10.24%
3.16%
2.05%
1.33%
---
47.34T
14.63T
9.487T
6.170T
---
14.22%
3.05%
2.38%
1.41%
---
67.28G
14.41G
11.27G
6.654G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.04%
0.98%
0.12%
0.01%
0.00%
---
14.06T
4.548T
557.7G
48.70G
5.077G
---
3.63%
1.52%
0.19%
0.02%
0.03%
---
17.18G
7.170G
891.7M
86.78M
132.6M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
BBCP
IBP
---
3.59%
0.10%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.60T
450.6G
13.13G
7.037G
3.323G
170.6M
---
4.62%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.85G
495.6M
29.11M
60.13M
5.367M
445.8k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
2.50%
0.24%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.56T
1.101T
247.8G
59.33G
30.08G
10.78G
667.4M
162.6M
14.70k
---
2.14%
0.31%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.14G
1.490G
253.7M
68.87M
42.07M
16.89M
1.985M
570.8k
300.0
File Sharing
Hotline
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.76%
0.67%
0.29%
0.29%
0.15%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.492T
3.101T
1.348T
1.323T
702.5G
109.2G
23.40G
12.69G
6.634G
2.507G
1.528G
841.1M
107.7M
---
0.74%
0.71%
0.41%
0.47%
0.20%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.483G
3.349G
1.957G
2.243G
940.9M
237.2M
34.80M
20.19M
6.450M
25.48M
1.931M
934.4k
123.9k
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
X11
AFS
Telnet
NFS
MS Windows
NTP
IRC
IDENT
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.64%
0.34%
0.16%
0.15%
0.14%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.951T
1.579T
729.0G
670.7G
646.0G
91.89G
42.45G
37.70G
34.25G
29.98G
26.95G
20.00G
17.09G
7.848G
5.893G
101.5M
13.96M
---
0.99%
0.54%
0.15%
1.15%
0.20%
0.05%
0.06%
0.01%
0.09%
0.08%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.676G
2.546G
701.9M
5.429G
953.8M
253.4M
276.8M
56.06M
420.8M
393.8M
180.4M
39.07M
27.64M
12.90M
46.46M
1.547M
119.5k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.23%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.057T
202.1G
47.85G
42.48G
6.840G
6.497G
3.601G
---
0.33%
0.07%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.561G
353.0M
339.8M
64.26M
8.048M
14.01M
10.48M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.72%
---
216.0T
---
53.79%
---
254.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
462.4T
---
100.00%
---
473.2G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.10% 470.7G 1.11% 5.257G
IGMP[2]0.00% 329.6M 0.00% 2.823M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 2.846G 0.00% 18.20M
TCP[6]66.82% 309.0T 66.58% 315.0G
UDP[17]9.85% 45.54T 9.81% 46.40G
IPv6[41]0.00% 3.529G 0.00% 21.74M
GRE[47]23.09% 106.7T 22.28% 105.4G
ESP[50]0.12% 557.7G 0.19% 891.7M
AX.25[93]0.00% 1.635M 0.00% 9.600k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.828G 0.01% 35.61M
IPMP[169]0.00% 16.86M 0.00% 224.4k
Other0.01% 51.59G 0.02% 97.40M
Total100.00% 462.4T 100.00% 473.2G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.95% 184.3G
Medium (100-1400B)15.73% 74.44G
Large (1401-1500B)29.44% 139.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)15.87% 75.09G
Total100.00% 473.2G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.85% 443.2T 95.73% 452.9G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.14% 658.2G 0.19% 895.4M
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 4.232G 0.00% 19.24M
Other4.01% 18.54T 4.08% 19.30G
Total100.00% 462.4T 100.00% 473.2G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.93% 4.285T 0.63% 2.978G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200000.92% 4.232T 0.92% 4.343G
21280.45% 2.098T 0.61% 2.875G
191010.35% 1.607T 0.36% 1.706G
200010.26% 1.183T 0.25% 1.178G
400000.24% 1.122T 0.23% 1.091G