Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20061225

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20061225 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 50.31% of octets and 23.93% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.381M 3 10.05M
5 1.484M 8 10.50M
10 1.608M 15 10.97M
50 3.205M 58 18.16M
90 16.36M 59 54.90M
95 33.13M 59 78.62M
99 87.90M 59 457.2M
99.9 1.014G 119 3.684G
99.99 1.121G 120 3.786G
99.999 1.757G 125 3.846G
100 259.2G 127 3.915G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.91% 3.265G
Medium (100-1400B)7.32% 6.112G
Large (1401-1500B)79.75% 66.58G
Jumbo (>1500B)9.02% 7.534G
Total100.00% 83.49G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement42.51% 73.97T 17.46% 14.58G 1.93% 70.56k
Data Transfers15.63% 27.20T 22.48% 18.76G 31.42% 1.147M
Encrypted Traffic5.05% 8.794T 7.26% 6.062G 7.13% 260.1k
Advanced Apps4.56% 7.939T 6.43% 5.371G 10.96% 400.2k
File Sharing3.09% 5.378T 4.50% 3.754G 3.09% 112.8k
Misc0.18% 313.2G 0.27% 223.1M 0.59% 21.50k
Games0.11% 188.4G 0.16% 130.6M 0.23% 8.232k
Audio/Video0.10% 179.1G 0.15% 122.8M 0.38% 13.96k
Unidentified28.75% 50.03T 41.29% 34.47G 44.26% 1.615M
Total100.00% 174.0T 100.00% 83.49G 100.00% 3.650M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.176G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
952.3M149912Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
923.3M150011SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
912.6M150026ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
339.2M149915NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
286.7M150012Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
147.0M136717NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
101.2M150018NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf
101.1M150016CERN [513]U Florida [6356]Iperf
91.64M150022NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
323.5M866215NCSA [1224]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]50220 -> 5150
321.0M440914ORNL [50]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]52507 -> 5150
261.6M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
248.3M147823NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
211.7M150017NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
187.8M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
180.4M239849Argonne [683]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]40121 -> 5150
159.0M150011PSC [1207]U Minnesota [217]SSH
148.8M150055CalTech [31]CERN [513]60334 -> 5016
145.8M811313SDSC [195]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]45245 -> 5150

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 288.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Measurement29.14% 100.7T 7.78% 27.13G
Data Transfers18.32% 63.35T 22.30% 77.81G
Advanced Apps4.97% 17.18T 6.50% 22.69G
Encrypted Traffic3.95% 13.67T 5.22% 18.20G
File Sharing3.94% 13.63T 6.00% 20.94G
Audio/Video3.89% 13.43T 3.53% 12.30G
Misc1.62% 5.617T 3.89% 13.57G
Games0.28% 968.8G 0.47% 1.647G
Unidentified33.88% 117.1T 44.31% 154.5G
Total100.00% 345.8T 100.00% 348.9G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
29.01%
0.13%
0.00%
---
100.3T
443.3G
17.12M
---
6.28%
1.49%
0.00%
---
21.92G
5.211G
237.8k
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
10.37%
4.28%
2.39%
1.29%
---
35.85T
14.79T
8.251T
4.449T
---
13.55%
4.27%
3.13%
1.35%
---
47.27G
14.90G
10.91G
4.722G
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
BBCP
---
4.85%
0.11%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.76T
392.4G
13.33G
7.641G
4.619G
2.684G
---
6.35%
0.13%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
---
22.14G
441.4M
30.51M
7.323M
59.39M
4.378M
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.96%
0.83%
0.15%
0.01%
0.00%
---
10.25T
2.865T
511.6G
31.76G
12.97G
---
3.62%
1.26%
0.23%
0.02%
0.09%
---
12.64G
4.410G
786.0M
68.25M
302.3M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Hotline
Audiogalaxy
eDonkey2000
BitTorrent
Gnutella
WinMX
FastTrack
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Blubster
Direct Connect++
---
1.84%
1.01%
0.80%
0.15%
0.12%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.369T
3.492T
2.777T
512.8G
410.9G
39.80G
17.39G
11.30G
2.580G
915.1M
275.3M
222.4M
310.0k
---
3.70%
1.02%
0.88%
0.20%
0.18%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.90G
3.558G
3.060G
682.9M
611.3M
79.56M
18.00M
18.38M
3.285M
1.424M
395.2k
1.722M
3.600k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
3.63%
0.18%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.54T
622.3G
201.0G
42.19G
20.01G
7.667G
826.9M
280.9M
26.70k
---
3.20%
0.24%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.16G
852.6M
195.0M
48.66M
28.63M
12.14M
2.315M
600.8k
600.0
Misc
Mail
Squid
X11
Port 0
DNS
MS Windows
AFS
Telnet
NFS
IRC
NTP
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
AOL AIM
RTIP
---
0.50%
0.48%
0.21%
0.18%
0.18%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.722T
1.643T
719.8G
639.2G
605.6G
60.70G
47.57G
45.93G
36.37G
35.25G
30.89G
9.523G
8.161G
5.669G
5.010G
1.002G
4.380M
---
0.89%
0.73%
0.29%
0.17%
1.35%
0.12%
0.05%
0.08%
0.01%
0.04%
0.12%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.112G
2.543G
1.012G
608.0M
4.725G
424.7M
180.2M
284.9M
48.72M
137.9M
405.7M
23.85M
16.23M
44.03M
9.056M
1.787M
108.3k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Quake
Half-Life
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
Spy Arcade
---
0.23%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
784.4G
128.1G
28.45G
19.03G
3.999G
3.730G
1.107G
---
0.35%
0.07%
0.01%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.213G
233.8M
48.09M
135.2M
6.414M
8.117M
2.678M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
33.88%
---
117.1T
---
44.31%
---
154.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
345.8T
---
100.00%
---
348.9G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.13% 443.3G 1.49% 5.211G
IGMP[2]0.00% 93.49M 0.00% 2.310M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 2.631G 0.01% 18.07M
TCP[6]78.82% 272.6T 75.88% 264.7G
UDP[17]14.64% 50.64T 16.16% 56.39G
IPv6[41]0.00% 4.966G 0.01% 24.61M
GRE[47]6.25% 21.59T 6.19% 21.59G
ESP[50]0.15% 511.6G 0.23% 786.0M
AX.25[93]0.00% 329.2k 0.00% 7.900k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.798G 0.01% 34.94M
IPMP[169]0.00% 17.12M 0.00% 237.8k
Other0.01% 33.11G 0.02% 74.65M
Total100.00% 345.8T 100.00% 348.9G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.81% 138.8G
Medium (100-1400B)20.15% 70.28G
Large (1401-1500B)33.70% 117.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)6.35% 22.14G
Total100.00% 348.9G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.53% 330.3T 95.15% 331.9G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.08% 288.3G 0.11% 398.9M
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 2.227G 0.00% 8.395M
Other4.38% 15.15T 4.73% 16.51G
Total100.00% 345.8T 100.00% 348.9G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable1.14% 3.927T 0.79% 2.749G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200001.15% 3.975T 1.17% 4.079G
5441.03% 3.547T 1.01% 3.512G
21280.55% 1.901T 0.75% 2.626G
200010.46% 1.598T 0.44% 1.540G
51200.38% 1.309T 0.37% 1.298G