Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20061218

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20061218 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 48.86% of octets and 23.62% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.374M 3 10.05M
5 1.459M 10 10.48M
10 1.554M 20 10.95M
50 2.944M 58 17.40M
90 13.77M 59 51.75M
95 25.01M 59 78.90M
99 66.45M 59 231.3M
99.9 1.008G 119 3.656G
99.99 1.096G 120 3.776G
99.999 2.286G 123 3.844G
100 252.0G 124 18.10G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.18% 3.323G
Medium (100-1400B)6.04% 6.303G
Large (1401-1500B)83.52% 87.14G
Jumbo (>1500B)7.26% 7.576G
Total100.00% 104.3G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement35.63% 72.84T 12.78% 13.33G 1.43% 70.68k
Data Transfers18.45% 37.71T 24.94% 26.02G 31.18% 1.537M
Encrypted Traffic7.39% 15.11T 9.97% 10.40G 9.82% 484.3k
Advanced Apps4.57% 9.334T 6.04% 6.305G 9.01% 444.3k
File Sharing3.11% 6.359T 4.26% 4.442G 3.18% 156.7k
Misc0.24% 482.8G 0.34% 350.7M 0.65% 32.24k
Audio/Video0.16% 334.6G 0.22% 231.6M 0.56% 27.56k
Games0.14% 296.3G 0.20% 207.3M 0.30% 14.93k
Unidentified30.30% 61.94T 41.25% 43.04G 43.85% 2.161M
Total100.00% 204.4T 100.00% 104.3G 100.00% 4.930M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.787G900025APAN-JP [7660]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]Iperf
1.095G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
969.1M900030APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
968.1M150011Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
903.9M150030ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
890.7M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
348.6M150018NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
288.0M150010Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
150.1M137918NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
102.6M150011CERN [513]U Florida [6356]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
797.1M900016Argonne [683]TACCNET [32093]Audiogalaxy
744.4M900024NCSA [1224]TACCNET [32093]34449 -> 50000
721.1M900013INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]TACCNET [32093]33030 -> 50000
633.0M899227SDSC [195]TACCNET [32093]33701 -> 50000
406.8M150010PSC [1207]TACCNET [32093]50002 -> 50002
293.0M150015Indiana [87]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Rsync
264.5M150016NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
251.1M147915NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
211.3M150054NCSA [1224]UCLA [52]SSH
204.5M150045Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 406.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Measurement23.89% 99.94T 5.88% 25.98G
Data Transfers23.02% 96.33T 26.41% 116.7G
Encrypted Traffic5.55% 23.22T 6.64% 29.32G
File Sharing5.54% 23.17T 8.54% 37.73G
Advanced Apps4.50% 18.84T 5.51% 24.35G
Audio/Video3.99% 16.70T 3.48% 15.35G
Misc1.91% 7.974T 4.22% 18.65G
Games0.46% 1.919T 0.69% 3.036G
Unidentified31.14% 130.2T 38.63% 170.6G
Total100.00% 418.4T 100.00% 441.8G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
23.78%
0.10%
0.00%
---
99.50T
438.9G
25.39M
---
4.74%
1.14%
0.00%
---
20.96G
5.020G
352.7k
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
14.83%
3.53%
2.92%
1.74%
---
62.07T
14.77T
12.22T
7.264T
---
18.11%
3.37%
3.14%
1.80%
---
80.00G
14.88G
13.87G
7.952G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.01%
1.36%
0.17%
0.01%
0.00%
---
16.77T
5.689T
708.0G
47.59G
2.592G
---
4.38%
1.98%
0.24%
0.02%
0.01%
---
19.37G
8.749G
1.063G
96.18M
48.55M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
3.11%
0.96%
0.83%
0.44%
0.16%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.00T
4.017T
3.473T
1.835T
657.4G
139.7G
25.10G
12.88G
3.894G
1.776G
1.120G
305.0M
784.8k
---
5.86%
0.96%
0.79%
0.65%
0.20%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.88G
4.245G
3.492G
2.867G
873.6M
297.1M
37.71M
18.54M
4.885M
2.377M
7.783M
627.5k
13.90k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
BBCP
---
4.34%
0.15%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.16T
647.0G
15.90G
8.538G
8.441G
7.089G
---
5.33%
0.16%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.53G
702.9M
36.21M
65.14M
9.081M
13.99M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
3.57%
0.30%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.92T
1.243T
427.3G
44.06G
32.33G
25.17G
2.667G
939.0M
25.40k
---
2.97%
0.37%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.14G
1.631G
443.9M
57.46M
46.81M
28.63M
5.523M
1.710M
500.0
Misc
Mail
Squid
X11
DNS
Port 0
MS Windows
AFS
Telnet
IRC
NFS
NTP
IDENT
SOCKS
RPC Portmapper
SNMP
AOL AIM
RTIP
---
0.85%
0.41%
0.20%
0.19%
0.17%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.543T
1.734T
834.0G
785.1G
701.6G
77.47G
76.80G
52.52G
36.30G
35.75G
33.69G
28.84G
17.12G
7.423G
6.609G
3.276G
14.10M
---
1.32%
0.62%
0.27%
1.39%
0.15%
0.16%
0.05%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.814G
2.742G
1.188G
6.153G
675.3M
728.5M
242.4M
281.9M
173.2M
56.17M
442.5M
54.08M
30.46M
15.05M
48.92M
4.575M
114.2k
Games
DirectX
Asheron
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.29%
0.08%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.212T
349.1G
203.6G
74.56G
70.86G
6.374G
2.539G
---
0.41%
0.05%
0.08%
0.12%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.815G
227.4M
355.8M
532.9M
91.55M
9.055M
3.994M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
31.14%
---
130.2T
---
38.63%
---
170.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
418.4T
---
100.00%
---
441.8G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.10% 438.9G 1.14% 5.020G
IGMP[2]0.00% 102.8M 0.00% 2.522M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 2.949G 0.01% 24.90M
TCP[6]83.73% 350.3T 80.69% 356.5G
UDP[17]14.94% 62.49T 16.81% 74.25G
IPv6[41]0.00% 4.274G 0.00% 19.16M
GRE[47]1.05% 4.380T 1.09% 4.814G
ESP[50]0.17% 708.0G 0.24% 1.063G
AX.25[93]0.00% 307.8k 0.00% 6.300k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.278G 0.01% 37.36M
IPMP[169]0.00% 25.39M 0.00% 352.7k
Other0.01% 48.39G 0.02% 102.0M
Total100.00% 418.4T 100.00% 441.8G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)37.67% 166.4G
Medium (100-1400B)23.48% 103.7G
Large (1401-1500B)36.39% 160.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.46% 10.86G
Total100.00% 441.8G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.58% 395.7T 94.47% 417.4G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.36% 1.489T 0.43% 1.919G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 5.271G 0.01% 25.20M
Other5.06% 21.16T 5.09% 22.50G
Total100.00% 418.4T 100.00% 441.8G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable1.01% 4.213T 0.67% 2.958G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200001.35% 5.653T 1.34% 5.919G
5440.60% 2.530T 0.56% 2.472G
21280.53% 2.207T 0.67% 2.981G
191010.36% 1.512T 0.36% 1.574G
200010.34% 1.407T 0.30% 1.324G