Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20061120

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20061120 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 44.28% of octets and 19.94% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.378M 4 10.05M
5 1.471M 12 10.50M
10 1.580M 17 10.95M
50 3.095M 58 16.30M
90 10.41M 59 42.60M
95 18.29M 59 62.40M
99 61.73M 59 210.7M
99.9 1.009G 119 3.657G
99.99 1.110G 120 3.775G
99.999 2.400G 150 3.833G
100 266.4G 157 3.917G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.46% 3.528G
Medium (100-1400B)5.93% 6.048G
Large (1401-1500B)82.38% 84.10G
Jumbo (>1500B)8.24% 8.406G
Total100.00% 102.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement39.54% 81.75T 15.06% 15.37G 1.75% 94.01k
Data Transfers18.43% 38.10T 25.68% 26.21G 31.01% 1.662M
Encrypted Traffic9.92% 20.51T 13.98% 14.27G 15.67% 840.2k
Advanced Apps4.32% 8.938T 5.91% 6.031G 7.75% 415.3k
File Sharing3.17% 6.553T 4.49% 4.587G 3.24% 173.7k
Misc0.19% 398.1G 0.28% 282.5M 0.49% 26.43k
Games0.19% 385.0G 0.27% 270.5M 0.37% 19.85k
Audio/Video0.17% 361.3G 0.24% 249.7M 0.52% 28.08k
Unidentified24.07% 49.76T 34.09% 34.79G 39.19% 2.100M
Total100.00% 206.7T 100.00% 102.0G 100.00% 5.360M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.235G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
887.8M150019SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
881.2M150010Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
781.2M150010ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
345.6M149923NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
307.0M150015Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf
294.7M150010Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
223.3M150060Unknown [32361]ANBR [1251]Iperf
194.8M149919Unknown [32361]Unknown [0]Iperf
151.3M136116NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
313.1M150010Abilene [11537]Indiana [87]3003 -> 1350
266.9M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
258.5M148420NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
248.4M150046Oregon State U [4201]UCLA [52]1147 -> 49000
219.4M150039Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
201.9M150030Indiana [87]NCSA [1224]53310 -> 59703
199.5M150016NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
185.1M149725NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
184.8M150016Indiana [87]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Rsync
181.8M150010Indiana [87]Abilene [11537]1349 -> 3002

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 418.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Measurement23.13% 108.0T 5.17% 26.45G
Data Transfers23.04% 107.5T 26.16% 133.9G
Encrypted Traffic7.07% 33.00T 7.89% 40.37G
File Sharing5.58% 26.05T 8.50% 43.48G
Audio/Video4.07% 18.99T 3.31% 16.95G
Advanced Apps3.77% 17.59T 4.70% 24.08G
Misc1.74% 8.146T 3.95% 20.21G
Games0.46% 2.148T 0.87% 4.430G
Unidentified31.14% 145.4T 39.45% 201.9G
Total100.00% 466.9T 100.00% 511.8G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
23.07%
0.06%
0.00%
---
107.7T
286.9G
158.3M
---
4.57%
0.59%
0.00%
---
23.41G
3.038G
2.198M
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
15.34%
3.60%
2.18%
1.91%
---
71.63T
16.83T
10.19T
8.919T
---
18.61%
3.33%
2.34%
1.89%
---
95.24G
17.02G
11.95G
9.690G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
5.61%
1.29%
0.15%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.21T
6.022T
722.2G
46.18G
1.307G
---
5.70%
1.94%
0.23%
0.02%
0.00%
---
29.15G
9.928G
1.169G
123.3M
5.705M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Hotline
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
2.97%
0.83%
0.72%
0.71%
0.23%
0.11%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.85T
3.857T
3.350T
3.337T
1.067T
516.3G
41.93G
14.22G
14.02G
2.710G
1.452G
491.5M
422.2M
---
5.43%
0.77%
0.76%
1.02%
0.28%
0.23%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.77G
3.923G
3.875G
5.208G
1.420G
1.156G
60.34M
19.90M
18.34M
32.34M
1.912M
959.6k
496.4k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
3.63%
0.31%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.96T
1.464T
436.9G
54.45G
50.81G
22.66G
2.482G
276.0M
12.00k
---
2.82%
0.37%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.41G
1.901G
455.2M
71.95M
74.89M
31.64M
6.247M
1.021M
300.0
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
3.57%
0.13%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.68T
602.2G
275.5G
17.79G
11.66G
4.193G
---
4.50%
0.13%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.02G
654.0M
286.0M
37.35M
74.09M
4.863M
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
X11
DNS
AFS
Telnet
MS Windows
IRC
NFS
NTP
IDENT
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.64%
0.45%
0.20%
0.18%
0.18%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.976T
2.112T
934.8G
844.2G
836.6G
88.45G
71.91G
64.97G
52.32G
46.66G
37.58G
33.60G
26.25G
13.78G
5.978G
118.4M
12.70M
---
1.06%
0.64%
0.17%
0.24%
1.35%
0.05%
0.07%
0.15%
0.06%
0.01%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.415G
3.280G
877.2M
1.229G
6.932G
267.7M
353.7M
789.5M
317.6M
75.60M
493.4M
60.87M
48.49M
21.32M
47.01M
1.542M
264.7k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.35%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.656T
224.4G
175.2G
55.76G
21.17G
8.477G
6.886G
---
0.49%
0.09%
0.25%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.524G
462.3M
1.286G
99.90M
34.86M
10.53M
11.86M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
31.14%
---
145.4T
---
39.45%
---
201.9G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
466.9T
---
100.00%
---
511.8G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 286.9G 0.59% 3.038G
IGMP[2]0.00% 117.3M 0.00% 2.798M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 2.207G 0.00% 16.47M
TCP[6]81.95% 382.7T 79.67% 407.8G
UDP[17]17.49% 81.66T 19.05% 97.52G
IPv6[41]0.00% 7.209G 0.00% 12.51M
GRE[47]0.33% 1.559T 0.41% 2.099G
ESP[50]0.15% 722.2G 0.23% 1.169G
AX.25[93]0.00% 279.3k 0.00% 6.000k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.947G 0.01% 43.60M
IPMP[169]0.00% 158.3M 0.00% 2.198M
Other0.01% 46.94G 0.03% 129.1M
Total100.00% 466.9T 100.00% 511.8G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.02% 194.6G
Medium (100-1400B)25.60% 131.0G
Large (1401-1500B)34.12% 174.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.25% 11.52G
Total100.00% 511.8G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.05% 439.1T 93.90% 480.6G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.38% 1.763T 0.46% 2.363G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 6.623G 0.00% 23.09M
Other5.57% 26.03T 5.64% 28.86G
Total100.00% 466.9T 100.00% 511.8G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.62% 2.873T 0.40% 2.038G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
60001.52% 7.095T 0.94% 4.818G
336220.94% 4.368T 0.58% 2.959G
327810.61% 2.838T 0.38% 1.933G
60020.61% 2.835T 0.38% 1.930G
327800.61% 2.831T 0.38% 1.933G