Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20061016

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20061016 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/4 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 46.05% of octets and 21.31% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.377M 5 10.05M
5 1.463M 13 10.50M
10 1.566M 23 10.95M
50 3.080M 58 18.31M
90 11.02M 59 55.50M
95 16.99M 59 74.70M
99 54.65M 59 179.8M
99.9 1.009G 119 3.654G
99.99 1.095G 120 3.780G
99.999 2.581G 125 3.843G
100 230.4G 129 3.923G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.66% 3.381G
Medium (100-1400B)7.30% 9.266G
Large (1401-1500B)83.36% 105.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)6.68% 8.475G
Total100.00% 126.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement34.07% 82.58T 12.30% 15.60G 1.62% 96.04k
Data Transfers17.66% 42.80T 23.25% 29.50G 31.22% 1.852M
Encrypted Traffic11.26% 27.30T 15.64% 19.84G 11.71% 694.7k
Advanced Apps3.72% 9.008T 4.80% 6.096G 7.63% 452.4k
File Sharing2.86% 6.933T 3.83% 4.862G 3.21% 190.5k
Games0.26% 621.4G 0.36% 456.5M 0.54% 32.15k
Misc0.23% 550.3G 0.31% 395.3M 0.58% 34.60k
Audio/Video0.17% 400.1G 0.22% 277.3M 0.52% 30.77k
Unidentified29.79% 72.21T 39.29% 49.86G 42.97% 2.548M
Total100.00% 242.4T 100.00% 126.9G 100.00% 5.932M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.111G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.029G900015Abilene [11537]Unknown [0]Iperf
941.2M150010Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
899.8M150010SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
851.1M150010ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
680.0M900017UCB [25]Abilene [11537]Iperf
443.9M150019Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf
357.9M150012SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
339.2M150022NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
283.0M142020Library of Congress [2532]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
697.7M150015NCSA [1224]PSC [1207]55571 -> 50068
473.6M150033TACCNET [32093]PSC [1207]36903 -> 50069
457.8M900015PSC-NCNE [5050]SDSC [195]51292 -> 5999
253.3M147318NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
253.0M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
235.4M150010Abilene [11537]U Minnesota [217]3003 -> 1151
217.6M150045Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
206.7M150015NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
205.4M150025UCLA [52]Oregon State U [4201]49000 -> 1381
194.3M150021Oregon State U [4201]UCLA [52]1441 -> 49000

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 499.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers21.28% 112.0T 23.17% 138.0G
Measurement20.96% 110.3T 4.69% 27.94G
Encrypted Traffic7.03% 37.02T 7.35% 43.80G
File Sharing5.68% 29.92T 8.18% 48.72G
Advanced Apps3.78% 19.88T 4.49% 26.71G
Audio/Video3.30% 17.39T 2.71% 16.15G
Misc1.74% 9.155T 3.53% 21.05G
Games0.61% 3.210T 1.29% 7.692G
Unidentified35.61% 187.4T 44.58% 265.5G
Total100.00% 526.4T 100.00% 595.6G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
12.83%
4.69%
2.33%
1.43%
---
67.53T
24.67T
12.25T
7.543T
---
15.11%
4.30%
2.39%
1.37%
---
90.00G
25.62G
14.25G
8.156G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
20.83%
0.22%
0.00%
---
109.6T
1.180T
402.5M
---
4.11%
1.02%
0.00%
---
24.48G
6.048G
5.590M
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
5.83%
1.02%
0.14%
0.04%
0.00%
---
30.68T
5.387T
759.3G
194.6G
1.160G
---
5.57%
1.54%
0.20%
0.04%
0.00%
---
33.18G
9.190G
1.194G
235.8M
6.096M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
2.61%
1.11%
0.85%
0.68%
0.23%
0.18%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.75T
5.832T
4.490T
3.595T
1.202T
968.9G
38.08G
17.08G
12.67G
2.382G
2.159G
881.7M
296.9k
---
4.46%
1.53%
0.87%
0.62%
0.27%
0.40%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.57G
9.139G
5.158G
3.718G
1.616G
2.375G
59.77M
24.03M
15.02M
33.87M
2.486M
1.531M
6.125k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
IBP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
3.46%
0.15%
0.12%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.21T
788.2G
620.6G
200.5G
32.72G
20.16G
---
4.17%
0.15%
0.11%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
---
24.81G
889.8M
666.9M
208.2M
95.11M
43.24M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
2.89%
0.31%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.19T
1.614T
394.7G
99.19G
66.79G
24.34G
3.961G
463.2M
14.00k
---
2.26%
0.34%
0.07%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.47G
2.022G
399.4M
116.6M
101.1M
35.30M
8.966M
1.835M
350.0
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
X11
DNS
AFS
MS Windows
Telnet
IDENT
IRC
NFS
AOL AIM
NTP
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.63%
0.34%
0.25%
0.24%
0.16%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.305T
1.770T
1.295T
1.267T
849.4G
217.3G
82.83G
79.60G
65.97G
65.22G
48.10G
39.05G
36.70G
26.26G
5.834G
140.8M
11.53M
---
0.94%
0.46%
0.18%
0.28%
1.13%
0.09%
0.21%
0.05%
0.02%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.605G
2.766G
1.096G
1.685G
6.708G
507.6M
1.241G
326.8M
102.4M
284.6M
84.36M
59.09M
482.1M
55.69M
45.76M
2.103M
247.6k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.44%
0.07%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.310T
378.4G
300.0G
134.2G
55.18G
18.54G
14.39G
---
0.63%
0.49%
0.11%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.746G
2.928G
655.5M
227.5M
82.37M
27.37M
24.36M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
35.61%
---
187.4T
---
44.58%
---
265.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
526.4T
---
100.00%
---
595.6G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.22% 1.180T 1.02% 6.048G
IGMP[2]0.00% 252.5M 0.00% 5.476M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 2.337G 0.00% 13.86M
TCP[6]85.80% 451.6T 82.21% 489.6G
UDP[17]13.71% 72.18T 16.62% 99.01G
IPv6[41]0.00% 4.512G 0.00% 12.42M
GRE[47]0.17% 913.6G 0.34% 2.015G
ESP[50]0.14% 759.3G 0.20% 1.194G
AX.25[93]0.00% 355.0k 0.00% 7.000k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.737G 0.01% 40.34M
IPMP[169]0.00% 402.5M 0.00% 5.590M
Other0.04% 195.2G 0.04% 238.8M
Total100.00% 526.4T 100.00% 595.6G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.06% 226.7G
Medium (100-1400B)26.00% 154.8G
Large (1401-1500B)34.03% 202.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.92% 11.41G
Total100.00% 595.6G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]93.31% 491.2T 93.75% 558.4G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.62% 3.282T 0.68% 4.077G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 24.04G 0.02% 106.9M
Other6.06% 31.90T 5.55% 33.06G
Total100.00% 526.4T 100.00% 595.6G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.75% 3.934T 0.46% 2.766G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
400001.02% 5.367T 0.87% 5.195G
163840.58% 3.070T 0.53% 3.135G
400010.46% 2.407T 0.39% 2.328G
200000.31% 1.648T 0.27% 1.614G
191010.25% 1.317T 0.24% 1.405G