Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20060501

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20060501 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/1 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 42.41% of octets and 17.16% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.377M 6 10.05M
5 1.469M 14 10.50M
10 1.581M 23 10.95M
50 2.947M 58 17.55M
90 9.132M 59 44.44M
95 13.90M 59 64.80M
99 52.75M 59 177.0M
99.9 1.011G 119 3.672G
99.99 1.134G 119 3.787G
99.999 6.133G 122 3.840G
100 259.2G 122 3.924G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.84% 2.912G
Medium (100-1400B)8.65% 8.869G
Large (1401-1500B)79.16% 81.17G
Jumbo (>1500B)9.35% 9.589G
Total100.00% 102.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement41.42% 89.52T 13.84% 14.19G 1.90% 99.44k
Data Transfers23.48% 50.75T 33.98% 34.84G 41.57% 2.176M
Encrypted Traffic6.61% 14.27T 9.51% 9.754G 7.76% 406.3k
Advanced Apps3.25% 7.024T 4.67% 4.784G 6.27% 328.4k
File Sharing2.97% 6.429T 4.44% 4.557G 4.31% 225.7k
Misc0.40% 862.9G 0.60% 612.7M 0.97% 50.93k
Games0.23% 494.2G 0.35% 363.7M 0.49% 25.87k
Audio/Video0.12% 263.9G 0.18% 185.6M 0.35% 18.12k
Unidentified21.52% 46.51T 32.42% 33.24G 36.37% 1.904M
Total100.00% 216.1T 100.00% 102.5G 100.00% 5.235M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.099G900016Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
954.0M150010Argonne [683]Georgia Institute of Technology [2637]Iperf
814.3M150012Unknown [32361]SDSC [195]Iperf
767.9M150020Unknown [32361]CalTech [31]Iperf
707.4M149910Abilene [11537]UNIVHAWAII [6360]Iperf
345.8M149920SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
307.5M150017Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
269.2M150020Unknown [32361]APNIC [7539]Iperf
211.3M150011Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
207.1M150015Unknown [32361]U Florida [6356]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
493.1M150010ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]56507 -> 3002
251.0M147722NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
246.0M149810Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]3003 -> 55832
194.1M142011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
182.9M150060PSC [1207]NCSA [1224]17844 -> 50001
160.8M150028UCAR [194]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]56058 -> 5102
150.5M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
134.1M150060Unknown [13041]UCAR [194]SSH
98.98M150029NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]OSU [159]Hotline
96.18M150014Abilene [11537]Indiana [87]SSH

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 440.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers26.36% 134.3T 27.70% 165.5G
Measurement23.57% 120.1T 4.35% 26.00G
File Sharing6.83% 34.81T 9.31% 55.66G
Encrypted Traffic4.69% 23.88T 5.40% 32.30G
Audio/Video3.10% 15.80T 2.53% 15.09G
Advanced Apps2.98% 15.20T 3.52% 21.02G
Misc1.84% 9.380T 3.28% 19.60G
Games0.68% 3.453T 1.44% 8.588G
Unidentified29.95% 152.6T 42.47% 253.8G
Total100.00% 509.7T 100.00% 597.7G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
14.40%
7.20%
2.53%
2.23%
---
73.40T
36.69T
12.89T
11.38T
---
17.04%
6.18%
2.09%
2.38%
---
101.8G
36.93G
12.49G
14.25G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
23.52%
0.33%
0.03%
---
119.8T
1.702T
138.9G
---
3.83%
3.35%
0.32%
---
22.87G
19.99G
1.929G
File Sharing
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Audiogalaxy
Gnutella
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
2.94%
1.85%
0.65%
0.55%
0.52%
0.30%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.98T
9.426T
3.303T
2.827T
2.660T
1.544T
44.48G
10.55G
5.095G
4.030G
2.609G
46.09M
3.984M
---
4.49%
2.11%
0.67%
1.19%
0.48%
0.34%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.85G
12.61G
3.980G
7.136G
2.858G
2.044G
72.38M
16.60M
76.46M
7.542M
4.465M
322.0k
71.40k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.42%
1.11%
0.14%
0.01%
0.00%
---
17.45T
5.677T
696.9G
54.20G
1.174G
---
3.51%
1.67%
0.20%
0.01%
0.00%
---
20.98G
10.00G
1.211G
89.35M
5.818M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
2.44%
0.58%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.41T
2.962T
241.4G
110.6G
42.01G
28.81G
4.910G
381.7M
0.000
---
1.82%
0.61%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.88G
3.617G
311.3M
162.4M
63.75M
37.84M
13.34M
1.178M
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
2.69%
0.19%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
13.71T
965.4G
422.8G
73.83G
28.82G
3.035G
---
3.23%
0.19%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.29G
1.111G
439.5M
127.4M
45.26M
5.835M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
X11
Squid
DNS
AFS
NFS
AOL AIM
IRC
MS Windows
Telnet
NTP
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.79%
0.31%
0.24%
0.23%
0.14%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.022T
1.592T
1.213T
1.165T
720.2G
217.4G
93.43G
91.06G
56.37G
47.91G
44.09G
37.71G
36.13G
35.52G
5.702G
74.38M
17.07M
---
1.10%
0.23%
0.31%
0.33%
0.92%
0.08%
0.02%
0.02%
0.04%
0.06%
0.05%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.559G
1.345G
1.847G
2.000G
5.507G
499.0M
139.0M
127.7M
253.7M
379.9M
269.8M
494.9M
68.97M
67.96M
42.26M
1.247M
366.1k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.49%
0.09%
0.07%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.483T
445.2G
347.2G
120.5G
24.88G
18.38G
14.36G
---
0.64%
0.62%
0.13%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.854G
3.715G
749.5M
181.0M
46.80M
18.89M
22.36M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
29.95%
---
152.6T
---
42.47%
---
253.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
509.7T
---
100.00%
---
597.7G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.33% 1.702T 3.35% 19.99G
IGMP[2]0.00% 128.0M 0.00% 2.901M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 219.1M 0.00% 1.519M
TCP[6]84.94% 432.9T 80.03% 478.3G
UDP[17]14.27% 72.72T 18.66% 111.5G
IPv6[41]0.00% 3.664G 0.00% 25.87M
GRE[47]0.60% 3.038T 0.56% 3.322G
ESP[50]0.14% 696.9G 0.20% 1.211G
AX.25[93]0.00% 105.0k 0.00% 1.400k
PIM[103]0.00% 5.396G 0.01% 41.75M
IPMP[169]0.03% 138.9G 0.32% 1.929G
Other0.01% 54.42G 0.02% 91.25M
Total100.00% 509.7T 100.00% 597.7G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.85% 238.2G
Medium (100-1400B)28.29% 169.0G
Large (1401-1500B)29.67% 177.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.19% 13.07G
Total100.00% 597.7G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.28% 480.5T 94.18% 562.9G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.53% 2.687T 0.56% 3.321G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 8.835G 0.01% 38.92M
Other5.19% 26.46T 5.26% 31.41G
Total100.00% 509.7T 100.00% 597.7G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.65% 3.321T 0.39% 2.317G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
324590.21% 1.082T 0.23% 1.345G
191010.10% 514.1G 0.09% 567.2M
66610.10% 508.0G 0.65% 3.906G
66600.08% 420.8G 0.36% 2.129G
90010.06% 281.1G 0.06% 370.2M