Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20060403

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20060403 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/4 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 44.99% of octets and 19.63% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.377M 6 10.05M
5 1.466M 15 10.50M
10 1.566M 27 10.95M
50 2.647M 58 16.65M
90 8.938M 59 41.60M
95 14.09M 59 60.49M
99 43.73M 59 145.8M
99.9 1.008G 119 3.640G
99.99 1.108G 120 3.777G
99.999 3.410G 121 3.864G
100 237.6G 128 7.272G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)5.79% 6.791G
Medium (100-1400B)5.95% 6.981G
Large (1401-1500B)80.05% 93.85G
Jumbo (>1500B)8.20% 9.616G
Total100.00% 117.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement38.59% 90.17T 12.37% 14.50G 1.52% 94.96k
Data Transfers21.30% 49.76T 32.34% 37.91G 35.18% 2.204M
Encrypted Traffic6.80% 15.87T 9.26% 10.85G 8.12% 508.8k
Advanced Apps4.44% 10.37T 6.02% 7.061G 7.04% 441.4k
File Sharing2.67% 6.248T 3.76% 4.412G 3.67% 229.7k
Misc0.34% 787.8G 0.48% 557.1M 0.69% 43.45k
Games0.22% 514.7G 0.33% 382.7M 0.46% 28.57k
Audio/Video0.12% 276.4G 0.16% 192.8M 0.31% 19.17k
Unidentified25.53% 59.66T 35.28% 41.36G 43.02% 2.695M
Total100.00% 233.6T 100.00% 117.2G 100.00% 6.265M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.134G900011Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
991.2M150012APAN-JP [7660]MREN [22335]Iperf
894.8M900030NYSERNet [3754]Abilene [11537]Iperf
764.1M150010Unknown [32361]CalTech [31]Iperf
760.9M150020Unknown [32361]SDSC [195]Iperf
725.7M150010Abilene [11537]UNIVHAWAII [6360]Iperf
463.5M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
426.5M900022Abilene [11537]NYSERNet [3754]Iperf
341.6M150011Argonne [683]ISI [4]Iperf
310.3M150015Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
547.5M149910Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]3003 -> 58435
217.4M147614NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
210.7M150020NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
203.7M150046PSC [1207]NCSA [1224]12945 -> 50000
201.6M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NCSA [1224]36415 -> 8889
185.5M150015SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]46755 -> 5011
169.4M150060PSC-NCNE [5050]UCAR [194]40238 -> 56117
162.9M150012UCAR [194]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]58603 -> 5102
151.0M150024NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
125.6M150020NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]UCAR [194]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 536.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers23.31% 121.0T 25.31% 151.1G
Measurement23.26% 120.8T 4.45% 26.57G
File Sharing6.77% 35.17T 10.01% 59.75G
Encrypted Traffic4.82% 25.05T 5.52% 32.95G
Audio/Video4.44% 23.04T 3.52% 21.04G
Advanced Apps3.81% 19.81T 4.47% 26.67G
Misc1.78% 9.251T 3.91% 23.33G
Games0.62% 3.206T 1.34% 7.981G
Unidentified31.19% 161.9T 41.48% 247.7G
Total100.00% 519.4T 100.00% 597.1G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
11.74%
6.38%
2.92%
2.27%
---
60.98T
33.15T
15.15T
11.78T
---
14.87%
5.59%
2.55%
2.30%
---
88.78G
33.37G
15.24G
13.74G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
23.19%
0.11%
0.01%
---
120.4T
588.2G
36.55G
---
3.87%
0.93%
0.09%
---
23.09G
5.572G
507.7M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Audiogalaxy
Gnutella
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
2.80%
1.78%
0.74%
0.59%
0.48%
0.37%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.53T
9.240T
3.859T
3.060T
2.505T
1.901T
41.82G
10.57G
9.052G
4.864G
3.532G
2.987G
2.130M
---
4.85%
2.07%
0.84%
1.33%
0.44%
0.44%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.99G
12.36G
5.017G
7.922G
2.637G
2.639G
70.95M
15.54M
12.26M
75.20M
4.087M
6.283M
43.40k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.86%
0.85%
0.07%
0.04%
0.00%
---
20.05T
4.415T
376.2G
202.1G
2.568G
---
4.04%
1.31%
0.13%
0.04%
0.00%
---
24.10G
7.852G
764.1M
217.4M
8.075M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
3.97%
0.40%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.62T
2.074T
167.4G
105.2G
42.10G
22.95G
2.947G
888.4M
0.000
---
3.00%
0.44%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.94G
2.610G
225.7M
149.5M
61.20M
38.08M
10.37M
3.215M
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
3.51%
0.20%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.21T
1.061T
444.3G
69.28G
20.18G
1.856G
---
4.17%
0.19%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.91G
1.126G
460.1M
129.5M
39.36M
2.266M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
X11
Squid
DNS
AFS
NFS
AOL AIM
MS Windows
Telnet
IRC
NTP
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.56%
0.36%
0.27%
0.23%
0.17%
0.10%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.904T
1.891T
1.414T
1.172T
871.2G
538.6G
118.4G
78.96G
72.57G
44.07G
39.54G
38.58G
34.16G
26.56G
4.957G
805.0M
16.00M
---
0.85%
0.25%
0.36%
0.34%
1.58%
0.16%
0.03%
0.02%
0.12%
0.04%
0.04%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.105G
1.509G
2.141G
2.008G
9.459G
949.3M
165.8M
117.1M
736.9M
211.3M
213.3M
506.5M
80.70M
70.79M
38.00M
17.89M
384.1k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.46%
0.07%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.370T
368.7G
333.4G
82.84G
27.07G
14.23G
9.061G
---
0.63%
0.53%
0.14%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.752G
3.144G
821.8M
149.8M
52.32M
20.50M
39.49M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
31.19%
---
161.9T
---
41.48%
---
247.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
519.4T
---
100.00%
---
597.1G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.11% 588.2G 0.93% 5.572G
IGMP[2]0.00% 126.2M 0.00% 2.863M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 287.2M 0.00% 3.105M
TCP[6]84.76% 440.2T 80.93% 483.2G
UDP[17]14.85% 77.12T 18.00% 107.4G
IPv6[41]0.00% 6.223G 0.00% 28.79M
GRE[47]0.21% 1.096T 0.32% 1.912G
ESP[50]0.07% 376.2G 0.13% 764.1M
AX.25[93]0.00% 178.5k 0.00% 2.275k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.991G 0.01% 39.67M
IPMP[169]0.01% 36.55G 0.09% 507.7M
Other0.04% 202.3G 0.04% 219.4M
Total100.00% 519.4T 100.00% 597.1G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.12% 245.5G
Medium (100-1400B)25.51% 152.3G
Large (1401-1500B)31.18% 186.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.19% 13.07G
Total100.00% 597.1G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.48% 490.7T 94.24% 562.7G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.46% 2.399T 0.53% 3.142G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 5.732G 0.00% 22.77M
Other5.06% 26.27T 5.23% 31.21G
Total100.00% 519.4T 100.00% 597.1G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.43% 2.222T 0.26% 1.577G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
324590.70% 3.637T 0.75% 4.471G
191010.32% 1.680T 0.32% 1.890G
200010.28% 1.444T 0.22% 1.299G
80900.22% 1.142T 0.21% 1.247G
200020.20% 1.057T 0.16% 961.0M