Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20060220

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20060220 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/1 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 43.64% of octets and 17.45% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.369M 5 10.05M
5 1.459M 14 10.40M
10 1.560M 23 10.92M
50 2.840M 58 16.95M
90 9.862M 59 47.70M
95 15.68M 59 69.15M
99 88.55M 59 356.7M
99.9 1.013G 119 3.659G
99.99 1.142G 119 3.781G
99.999 5.462G 120 3.839G
100 32.40G 120 3.923G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.42% 2.582G
Medium (100-1400B)6.58% 7.013G
Large (1401-1500B)80.69% 86.01G
Jumbo (>1500B)10.31% 10.99G
Total100.00% 106.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement43.05% 100.9T 13.36% 14.24G 1.83% 95.45k
Data Transfers21.31% 49.94T 31.96% 34.07G 42.21% 2.199M
Encrypted Traffic5.25% 12.29T 7.87% 8.393G 7.81% 406.9k
Advanced Apps3.16% 7.409T 4.78% 5.091G 6.22% 323.9k
File Sharing2.81% 6.584T 4.41% 4.702G 4.46% 232.5k
Misc0.26% 608.9G 0.40% 429.6M 0.75% 39.15k
Games0.23% 531.2G 0.37% 398.9M 0.53% 27.40k
Audio/Video0.14% 325.4G 0.21% 228.1M 0.44% 22.86k
Unidentified23.80% 55.77T 36.63% 39.04G 35.75% 1.862M
Total100.00% 234.3T 100.00% 106.6G 100.00% 5.210M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.074G900012Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
277.4M150019CalTech [31]U Florida [6356]Iperf
268.3M150013Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
246.3M150011SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
221.8M149910CalTech [31]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf
186.9M150015EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
176.8M150025NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
145.0M149918CalTech [31]SWITCH [559]Iperf
124.7M148919CalTech [31]IN2P3 [789]Iperf
118.9M149312CERN [513]U Florida [6356]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
304.1M150060SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]50729 -> 5011
274.6M147924NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
200.0M150025NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
160.2M150021NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
158.7M150012UCAR [194]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]50375 -> 5102
107.5M150021Indiana [87]Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Rsync
105.2M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]West Virginia U [12118]Hotline
101.0M150020NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]MIT [3]Hotline
99.24M150010JHU [5723]U Iowa [3676]56023 -> 20000
96.78M150027NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Boston U [111]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 438.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers26.22% 140.8T 27.72% 169.3G
Measurement25.26% 135.6T 4.92% 30.07G
File Sharing7.19% 38.59T 10.58% 64.63G
Encrypted Traffic3.82% 20.50T 4.65% 28.38G
Advanced Apps2.80% 15.06T 3.45% 21.07G
Misc1.76% 9.454T 3.53% 21.57G
Audio/Video1.41% 7.586T 1.48% 9.058G
Games0.70% 3.780T 1.51% 9.201G
Unidentified30.84% 165.6T 42.15% 257.4G
Total100.00% 537.1T 100.00% 610.7G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
15.41%
6.59%
2.31%
1.93%
---
82.75T
35.37T
12.38T
10.34T
---
17.83%
5.78%
2.41%
1.70%
---
108.8G
35.32G
14.73G
10.37G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
25.17%
0.61%
0.03%
---
135.1T
3.254T
146.0G
---
3.89%
6.88%
0.33%
---
23.77G
42.01G
2.028G
File Sharing
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Audiogalaxy
Gnutella
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Carracho
WinMX
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
2.87%
2.11%
0.60%
0.60%
0.55%
0.41%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.42T
11.35T
3.247T
3.238T
2.930T
2.216T
147.8G
18.04G
6.207G
5.841G
3.364G
1.508G
2.891M
---
5.06%
2.49%
0.68%
1.33%
0.49%
0.48%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
30.89G
15.21G
4.146G
8.146G
2.983G
2.924G
177.6M
28.34M
16.60M
84.92M
3.813M
2.469M
19.60k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.84%
0.89%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
---
15.27T
4.802T
382.5G
47.19G
1.236G
---
3.04%
1.48%
0.12%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.55G
9.021G
725.3M
76.37M
5.542M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
2.59%
0.09%
0.09%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.91T
502.1G
464.9G
161.3G
15.67G
1.827G
---
3.25%
0.09%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.85G
530.3M
484.5M
171.8M
34.92M
2.669M
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
X11
DNS
AFS
IRC
NFS
AOL AIM
MS Windows
Telnet
NTP
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.67%
0.34%
0.25%
0.21%
0.13%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.622T
1.827T
1.355T
1.108T
701.1G
265.2G
191.2G
91.42G
87.38G
68.30G
53.90G
34.51G
29.40G
10.67G
5.276G
914.9M
21.81M
---
1.01%
0.46%
0.18%
0.27%
0.90%
0.09%
0.33%
0.02%
0.02%
0.08%
0.05%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.186G
2.830G
1.110G
1.676G
5.498G
571.6M
1.993G
142.0M
122.2M
509.7M
291.1M
452.8M
85.35M
43.96M
41.02M
18.49M
128.1k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.88%
0.46%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.722T
2.491T
182.4G
91.98G
57.41G
32.36G
4.474G
4.039G
0.000
---
0.90%
0.50%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.474G
3.070G
232.2M
135.6M
79.73M
47.20M
9.870M
8.453M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.51%
0.08%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.740T
430.3G
422.7G
137.6G
30.55G
17.24G
1.529G
---
0.68%
0.58%
0.19%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.133G
3.555G
1.169G
250.8M
58.22M
28.37M
4.692M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
30.84%
---
165.6T
---
42.15%
---
257.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
537.1T
---
100.00%
---
610.7G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.61% 3.254T 6.88% 42.01G
IGMP[2]0.00% 46.93M 0.00% 1.376M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 1.409G 0.00% 7.847M
TCP[6]87.25% 468.6T 83.51% 510.0G
UDP[17]12.45% 66.89T 15.08% 92.07G
IPv6[41]0.00% 13.92G 0.01% 61.53M
GRE[47]0.13% 673.7G 0.24% 1.445G
ESP[50]0.07% 382.5G 0.12% 725.3M
AX.25[93]0.00% 14.28M 0.00% 54.60k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.590G 0.01% 36.78M
IPMP[169]0.03% 146.0G 0.33% 2.028G
Other0.01% 47.50G 0.01% 79.33M
Total100.00% 537.1T 100.00% 610.7G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.92% 249.9G
Medium (100-1400B)25.80% 157.5G
Large (1401-1500B)30.83% 188.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.45% 14.96G
Total100.00% 610.7G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.60% 508.1T 94.42% 576.6G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.47% 2.497T 0.54% 3.306G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 6.645G 0.00% 12.82M
Other4.94% 26.51T 5.04% 30.77G
Total100.00% 537.1T 100.00% 610.7G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.26% 1.417T 0.19% 1.151G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
50110.30% 1.602T 0.21% 1.275G
324590.12% 667.1G 0.13% 824.0M
191010.10% 518.6G 0.09% 576.1M
400000.08% 429.7G 0.05% 319.6M
80900.07% 356.4G 0.06% 383.7M