Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20060130

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20060130 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/3 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 39.73% of octets and 17.32% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.369M 5 10.05M
5 1.457M 13 10.35M
10 1.558M 20 10.80M
50 2.950M 58 17.10M
90 9.367M 59 45.29M
95 14.06M 59 63.75M
99 40.19M 59 139.3M
99.9 1.008G 119 3.639G
99.99 1.110G 120 3.776G
99.999 2.655G 120 3.842G
100 266.4G 122 3.928G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.63% 3.050G
Medium (100-1400B)7.64% 8.867G
Large (1401-1500B)83.51% 96.97G
Jumbo (>1500B)6.23% 7.229G
Total100.00% 116.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement33.29% 72.62T 12.65% 14.68G 1.43% 86.24k
Data Transfers24.80% 54.09T 31.98% 37.14G 38.74% 2.329M
Encrypted Traffic8.96% 19.54T 11.59% 13.45G 10.70% 643.6k
Advanced Apps5.43% 11.84T 7.09% 8.230G 9.88% 594.0k
File Sharing3.19% 6.956T 4.23% 4.911G 4.25% 255.4k
Misc0.32% 687.6G 0.48% 552.1M 0.76% 45.53k
Audio/Video0.31% 674.5G 0.40% 460.8M 0.78% 47.01k
Games0.23% 496.8G 0.31% 361.4M 0.42% 25.34k
Unidentified23.48% 51.22T 31.28% 36.32G 33.04% 1.986M
Total100.00% 218.1T 100.00% 116.1G 100.00% 6.013M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.142G900011Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
328.8M150060SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
319.6M149918CalTech [31]U Florida [6356]Iperf
293.2M150015CalTech [31]SWITCH [559]Iperf
291.8M150029NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
279.9M150012Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
177.8M149114CalTech [31]IN2P3 [789]Iperf
154.0M150010CalTech [31]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf
117.0M150016CalTech [31]CERN [513]Iperf
107.3M142013CalTech [31]DESY-HAMBURG [1754]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
313.7M150060SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]49619 -> 5011
216.5M148112NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
203.7M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
196.0M142016California SU [2152]PSC [1207]45027 -> 22230
155.1M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
151.1M150059U Minnesota [217]Unknown [18128]Rsync
149.7M150013EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Hotline
139.8M150012UCAR [194]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]55628 -> 5102
139.1M150012UCAR [194]PSC [1207]SSH
135.8M148815NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]West Virginia U [12118]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 504.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers27.23% 149.5T 27.11% 181.7G
Measurement17.41% 95.62T 3.79% 25.41G
File Sharing7.89% 43.34T 10.89% 73.01G
Encrypted Traffic6.14% 33.69T 6.43% 43.08G
Advanced Apps5.34% 29.29T 5.29% 35.47G
Audio/Video2.60% 14.27T 2.40% 16.06G
Misc2.11% 11.56T 3.71% 24.89G
Games0.70% 3.864T 1.43% 9.559G
Unidentified30.58% 167.9T 38.95% 261.1G
Total100.00% 549.1T 100.00% 670.4G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
16.16%
6.99%
2.38%
1.70%
---
88.76T
38.40T
13.04T
9.312T
---
17.77%
5.67%
2.25%
1.42%
---
119.1G
38.00G
15.07G
9.533G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
17.33%
0.18%
0.01%
---
95.18T
984.6G
48.48G
---
3.12%
1.47%
0.10%
---
20.89G
9.872G
673.4M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Gnutella
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Carracho
WinMX
Neo-Modus
Blubster
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
2.96%
2.58%
0.86%
0.66%
0.49%
0.32%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.23T
14.18T
4.711T
3.627T
2.691T
1.781T
64.12G
15.18G
14.36G
7.295G
6.227G
1.752G
366.6M
---
4.79%
2.88%
1.73%
0.69%
0.41%
0.36%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.10G
19.30G
11.58G
4.657G
2.718G
2.392G
94.46M
21.82M
24.30M
12.06M
97.10M
5.196M
417.4k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
5.15%
0.90%
0.08%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.26T
4.948T
420.6G
58.38G
1.243G
---
4.86%
1.43%
0.12%
0.01%
0.00%
---
32.60G
9.573G
815.1M
86.97M
6.011M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
BBCP
McIDAS
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
3.06%
1.91%
0.26%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
---
16.77T
10.50T
1.406T
502.6G
82.10G
24.20G
---
3.42%
1.54%
0.23%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
---
22.95G
10.29G
1.519G
520.1M
136.4M
41.66M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.77%
0.74%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.731T
4.049T
254.9G
154.2G
56.44G
21.36G
5.350G
1.373G
0.000
---
1.60%
0.69%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.75G
4.630G
329.7M
212.5M
80.06M
33.56M
14.24M
5.978M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Port 0
Squid
X11
DNS
AFS
AOL AIM
IRC
MS Windows
NFS
SOCKS
Telnet
IDENT
NTP
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.91%
0.31%
0.30%
0.23%
0.16%
0.09%
0.02%
0.02%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.975T
1.695T
1.638T
1.239T
866.5G
472.3G
122.4G
117.5G
111.0G
92.00G
71.39G
67.18G
60.06G
34.52G
5.246G
599.0M
26.87M
---
1.20%
0.20%
0.39%
0.28%
1.03%
0.13%
0.03%
0.15%
0.12%
0.02%
0.02%
0.06%
0.02%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.021G
1.350G
2.589G
1.873G
6.882G
902.0M
182.0M
1.020G
826.0M
162.3M
105.4M
377.8M
106.9M
452.9M
41.58M
2.440M
159.6k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.50%
0.09%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.767T
489.0G
412.5G
149.5G
35.31G
7.316G
3.475G
---
0.73%
0.14%
0.50%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.926G
943.8M
3.326G
273.3M
62.33M
20.11M
6.185M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
30.58%
---
167.9T
---
38.95%
---
261.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
549.1T
---
100.00%
---
670.4G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.18% 984.6G 1.47% 9.872G
IGMP[2]0.00% 50.61M 0.00% 1.386M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 225.9M 0.00% 1.907M
TCP[6]87.68% 481.4T 83.35% 558.7G
UDP[17]11.97% 65.75T 15.55% 104.2G
IPv6[41]0.00% 5.941G 0.00% 26.39M
GRE[47]0.18% 963.5G 0.28% 1.871G
ESP[50]0.08% 420.6G 0.12% 815.1M
AX.25[93]0.00% 131.1k 0.00% 1.400k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.494G 0.01% 38.15M
IPMP[169]0.01% 48.48G 0.10% 673.4M
Other0.01% 58.65G 0.01% 89.22M
Total100.00% 549.1T 100.00% 670.4G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.36% 270.5G
Medium (100-1400B)25.52% 171.0G
Large (1401-1500B)32.66% 218.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.46% 9.811G
Total100.00% 670.4G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]92.06% 505.5T 93.03% 623.7G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.51% 2.821T 0.57% 3.851G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 19.45G 0.01% 57.08M
Other7.43% 40.78T 6.39% 42.81G
Total100.00% 549.1T 100.00% 670.4G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.47% 2.594T 0.28% 1.875G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
324590.37% 2.056T 0.37% 2.512G
80900.33% 1.793T 0.29% 1.917G
400000.25% 1.355T 0.15% 1.018G
191010.24% 1.342T 0.23% 1.509G
50110.24% 1.331T 0.16% 1.063G