Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20060123

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20060123 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/3 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 42.09% of octets and 17.15% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.367M 7 10.05M
5 1.456M 14 10.36M
10 1.557M 21 10.80M
50 2.841M 58 17.10M
90 8.932M 59 43.66M
95 13.86M 59 61.05M
99 41.08M 59 142.9M
99.9 1.015G 119 3.677G
99.99 1.147G 120 3.785G
99.999 4.595G 126 3.846G
100 266.4G 135 4.496G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.49% 2.995G
Medium (100-1400B)6.66% 8.013G
Large (1401-1500B)81.73% 98.40G
Jumbo (>1500B)9.12% 10.98G
Total100.00% 120.3G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement40.09% 101.6T 13.06% 15.71G 1.73% 114.0k
Data Transfers23.88% 60.56T 34.37% 41.38G 40.43% 2.665M
Encrypted Traffic7.24% 18.35T 10.36% 12.47G 8.98% 592.0k
Advanced Apps5.78% 14.65T 8.26% 9.939G 11.14% 734.6k
File Sharing2.90% 7.362T 4.27% 5.143G 4.27% 281.4k
Misc0.34% 863.7G 0.53% 638.4M 0.72% 47.33k
Audio/Video0.23% 589.6G 0.34% 408.2M 0.62% 40.62k
Games0.22% 561.9G 0.33% 399.3M 0.44% 29.15k
Unidentified19.32% 49.00T 28.48% 34.29G 31.67% 2.088M
Total100.00% 253.6T 100.00% 120.3G 100.00% 6.592M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.166G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
983.8M900029APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
600.7M150060NCREN [81]Abilene [11537]Iperf
348.8M150010CalTech [31]U Florida [6356]Iperf
298.6M150011CalTech [31]SWITCH [559]Iperf
288.6M150023NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
270.1M150015Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
256.2M150013SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
185.4M150019CalTech [31]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf
181.5M148819CalTech [31]IN2P3 [789]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
299.1M150017APAN-JP [7660]NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Hotline
240.1M150029NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NCSA [1224]54407 -> 8889
203.3M150024NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
185.8M148030NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
167.8M150034U Minnesota [217]Unknown [18128]Rsync
156.4M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
147.6M150023UCAR [194]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]48569 -> 5102
144.9M150060Indiana [87]NCSA [1224]19490 -> 60369
141.8M150013U Minnesota [217]Indiana [87]Rsync
108.2M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]West Virginia U [12118]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 554.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers27.79% 167.4T 28.47% 199.8G
Measurement21.04% 126.7T 3.96% 27.79G
File Sharing7.33% 44.15T 10.13% 71.11G
Advanced Apps5.37% 32.32T 5.41% 37.98G
Encrypted Traffic4.72% 28.43T 5.43% 38.14G
Audio/Video3.01% 18.16T 2.82% 19.79G
Misc1.88% 11.32T 3.74% 26.28G
Games0.67% 4.034T 1.32% 9.275G
Unidentified28.20% 169.9T 38.71% 271.7G
Total100.00% 602.5T 100.00% 702.0G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
15.99%
7.81%
2.25%
1.73%
---
96.36T
47.07T
13.55T
10.44T
---
18.02%
6.67%
2.28%
1.51%
---
126.4G
46.79G
16.00G
10.59G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
20.97%
0.14%
0.01%
---
126.3T
850.9G
54.04G
---
3.29%
1.44%
0.11%
---
23.12G
10.12G
750.6M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Gnutella
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
2.74%
2.39%
0.72%
0.61%
0.47%
0.38%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.48T
14.38T
4.342T
3.649T
2.817T
2.310T
68.57G
56.32G
35.54G
5.664G
1.619G
1.087G
191.2M
---
4.23%
2.79%
1.56%
0.67%
0.40%
0.43%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.70G
19.55G
10.92G
4.720G
2.838G
3.046G
102.9M
85.81M
41.92M
85.75M
5.035M
1.903M
294.7k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
3.17%
1.64%
0.46%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.12T
9.906T
2.780T
445.6G
48.65G
17.13G
---
3.54%
1.39%
0.39%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
---
24.86G
9.735G
2.744G
487.0M
67.41M
79.44M
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.76%
0.90%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.63T
5.418T
336.1G
41.01G
1.299G
---
3.80%
1.52%
0.10%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.69G
10.64G
736.6M
63.84M
6.336M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
2.12%
0.78%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.79T
4.679T
318.2G
198.2G
117.5G
28.15G
11.97G
7.429G
0.000
---
1.94%
0.76%
0.06%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.59G
5.329G
399.2M
249.4M
133.3M
42.87M
28.87M
18.46M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Squid
X11
Port 0
DNS
AFS
IRC
AOL AIM
MS Windows
NFS
Telnet
SOCKS
NTP
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.80%
0.30%
0.23%
0.22%
0.15%
0.07%
0.02%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.838T
1.830T
1.376T
1.350T
893.1G
451.5G
116.9G
108.9G
93.98G
74.46G
62.12G
60.71G
35.67G
29.22G
6.019G
413.6M
12.31M
---
1.13%
0.42%
0.30%
0.17%
1.15%
0.12%
0.11%
0.02%
0.09%
0.02%
0.05%
0.08%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.900G
2.974G
2.100G
1.178G
8.101G
858.9M
791.4M
145.6M
637.0M
120.9M
321.2M
561.7M
468.1M
69.56M
47.04M
7.159M
313.6k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.49%
0.08%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.956T
471.7G
396.6G
157.8G
34.98G
10.69G
6.260G
---
0.65%
0.14%
0.47%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.594G
987.5M
3.314G
273.0M
71.15M
23.67M
10.83M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
28.20%
---
169.9T
---
38.71%
---
271.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
602.5T
---
100.00%
---
702.0G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.14% 850.9G 1.44% 10.12G
IGMP[2]0.00% 98.78M 0.00% 2.544M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 443.5M 0.00% 3.465M
TCP[6]87.59% 527.7T 82.53% 579.3G
UDP[17]12.09% 72.82T 16.38% 114.9G
IPv6[41]0.00% 19.89G 0.01% 49.87M
GRE[47]0.19% 1.162T 0.30% 2.073G
ESP[50]0.06% 336.1G 0.10% 736.6M
AX.25[93]0.00% 25.90k 0.00% 466.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.451G 0.01% 45.44M
IPMP[169]0.01% 54.04G 0.11% 750.6M
Other0.01% 41.27G 0.01% 65.95M
Total100.00% 602.5T 100.00% 702.0G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.53% 284.5G
Medium (100-1400B)25.52% 179.1G
Large (1401-1500B)31.98% 224.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.97% 13.82G
Total100.00% 702.0G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.02% 566.5T 94.04% 660.1G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.22% 1.338T 0.31% 2.152G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 18.32G 0.01% 60.19M
Other5.75% 34.66T 5.65% 39.63G
Total100.00% 602.5T 100.00% 702.0G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.47% 2.808T 0.28% 1.999G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
324590.35% 2.087T 0.36% 2.548G
191010.32% 1.946T 0.31% 2.194G
80900.32% 1.944T 0.29% 2.068G
400000.25% 1.534T 0.17% 1.163G
111050.11% 652.7G 0.09% 653.7M