Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20060116

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20060116 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Friday, Saturday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/5 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 44.63% of octets and 18.92% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.372M 6 10.05M
5 1.469M 15 10.37M
10 1.585M 21 10.85M
50 3.075M 58 16.89M
90 8.630M 59 41.89M
95 12.87M 59 58.65M
99 41.04M 59 128.5M
99.9 1.013G 119 3.687G
99.99 1.148G 119 6.683G
99.999 8.715G 120 7.258G
100 266.4G 121 12.48G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.56% 2.479G
Medium (100-1400B)5.95% 5.754G
Large (1401-1500B)83.47% 80.73G
Jumbo (>1500B)8.01% 7.749G
Total100.00% 96.71G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement39.83% 78.04T 16.14% 15.60G 1.53% 80.01k
Data Transfers23.97% 46.95T 33.27% 32.17G 38.62% 2.025M
Advanced Apps9.48% 18.58T 12.91% 12.48G 20.21% 1.059M
Encrypted Traffic6.09% 11.93T 8.39% 8.118G 7.13% 374.0k
File Sharing2.64% 5.180T 3.74% 3.618G 3.79% 198.9k
Misc0.27% 528.7G 0.46% 444.0M 0.62% 32.37k
Games0.20% 399.0G 0.30% 293.8M 0.40% 20.89k
Audio/Video0.19% 369.7G 0.26% 253.6M 0.47% 24.84k
Unidentified17.32% 33.94T 24.52% 23.71G 27.23% 1.428M
Total100.00% 195.9T 100.00% 96.71G 100.00% 5.244M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.092G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
976.6M150060Unknown [17934]MREN [22335]Iperf
697.9M150011NCREN [81]Abilene [11537]Iperf
339.6M150012CalTech [31]U Florida [6356]Iperf
331.6M150010Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
283.4M150020IIJNET [2505]Unknown [32361]Iperf
257.8M150011SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
247.0M150019CalTech [31]SWITCH [559]Iperf
174.8M149614CalTech [31]IN2P3 [789]Iperf
152.4M150013CalTech [31]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
441.2M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NCSA [1224]47849 -> 8889
201.1M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
188.8M148130NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
185.3M150015U Minnesota [217]Indiana [87]Rsync
159.5M150025UCAR [194]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]48413 -> 5102
158.9M150043U Minnesota [217]Unknown [18128]Rsync
138.4M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
112.5M150013Indiana [87]Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Rsync
108.8M150015NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]West Virginia U [12118]Hotline
103.8M150010JHU [5723]U Iowa [3676]56862 -> 20001

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 423.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers26.61% 116.8T 27.49% 140.5G
Measurement21.97% 96.47T 4.66% 23.81G
Advanced Apps7.68% 33.73T 7.47% 38.20G
File Sharing7.38% 32.41T 10.36% 52.94G
Encrypted Traffic4.29% 18.81T 5.02% 25.68G
Audio/Video2.57% 11.27T 2.47% 12.61G
Misc1.88% 8.263T 4.73% 24.20G
Games0.61% 2.683T 1.15% 5.897G
Unidentified27.01% 118.5T 36.65% 187.3G
Total100.00% 439.0T 100.00% 511.3G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
14.60%
7.40%
2.32%
2.28%
---
64.09T
32.50T
10.20T
10.02T
---
16.67%
6.36%
2.06%
2.40%
---
85.24G
32.50G
10.53G
12.25G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
21.92%
0.07%
0.01%
---
96.22T
317.4G
23.84G
---
4.11%
0.70%
0.06%
---
21.03G
3.563G
331.2M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
3.62%
3.42%
0.57%
0.07%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.88T
14.99T
2.506T
320.0G
18.88G
12.23G
---
4.03%
2.87%
0.49%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
---
20.61G
14.66G
2.503G
336.7M
31.42M
54.25M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Gnutella
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Carracho
WinMX
Neo-Modus
Blubster
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
2.86%
2.40%
0.69%
0.57%
0.46%
0.38%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.54T
10.55T
3.008T
2.519T
2.019T
1.684T
45.57G
20.42G
10.46G
5.271G
3.022G
863.9M
589.6M
---
4.68%
2.79%
1.37%
0.64%
0.40%
0.44%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.93G
14.28G
7.010G
3.262G
2.039G
2.240G
69.01M
28.99M
15.31M
8.372M
47.04M
2.646M
819.4k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.40%
0.80%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
---
14.94T
3.528T
309.0G
31.52G
907.7M
---
3.54%
1.35%
0.12%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.11G
6.917G
597.0M
50.61M
4.720M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.84%
0.64%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.096T
2.796T
157.0G
107.9G
89.23G
14.81G
8.342G
1.249G
0.000
---
1.74%
0.63%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.884G
3.204G
218.4M
151.2M
105.2M
25.87M
21.65M
7.247M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
X11
AFS
AOL AIM
MS Windows
Telnet
NFS
IRC
SOCKS
NTP
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.72%
0.30%
0.26%
0.22%
0.22%
0.07%
0.02%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.177T
1.300T
1.142T
970.9G
959.9G
288.1G
88.18G
74.52G
70.86G
49.46G
46.25G
42.17G
27.57G
20.29G
5.406G
135.3M
14.55M
---
1.08%
0.42%
0.18%
2.32%
0.27%
0.11%
0.02%
0.12%
0.06%
0.02%
0.05%
0.01%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.509G
2.130G
939.7M
11.84G
1.385G
545.7M
114.5M
634.6M
283.3M
87.60M
231.9M
58.50M
361.9M
46.55M
35.45M
2.117M
297.3k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.44%
0.07%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.928T
303.4G
272.8G
143.5G
24.47G
8.053G
2.356G
---
0.59%
0.13%
0.37%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.029G
653.3M
1.906G
235.4M
45.44M
22.07M
5.569M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
27.01%
---
118.5T
---
36.65%
---
187.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
439.0T
---
100.00%
---
511.3G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 317.4G 0.70% 3.563G
IGMP[2]0.00% 49.01M 0.00% 1.211M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 3.785G 0.00% 12.65M
TCP[6]87.27% 383.1T 81.39% 416.1G
UDP[17]12.44% 54.60T 17.67% 90.36G
IPv6[41]0.00% 5.746G 0.00% 22.75M
GRE[47]0.16% 689.6G 0.26% 1.316G
ESP[50]0.07% 309.0G 0.12% 597.0M
AX.25[93]0.00% 73.50k 0.00% 1.260k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.759G 0.01% 31.61M
IPMP[169]0.01% 23.84G 0.06% 331.2M
Other0.01% 31.73G 0.01% 52.31M
Total100.00% 439.0T 100.00% 511.3G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.68% 208.0G
Medium (100-1400B)24.51% 125.3G
Large (1401-1500B)32.88% 168.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.92% 9.828G
Total100.00% 511.3G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.37% 414.3T 94.55% 483.4G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.21% 917.6G 0.24% 1.251G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 10.13G 0.01% 36.39M
Other5.42% 23.80T 5.19% 26.56G
Total100.00% 439.0T 100.00% 511.3G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.45% 1.985T 0.28% 1.423G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
191010.48% 2.110T 0.46% 2.328G
324590.48% 2.101T 0.50% 2.550G
80900.48% 2.091T 0.43% 2.223G
400000.42% 1.842T 0.27% 1.380G
327790.23% 1.006T 0.13% 673.5M