Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20060109

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20060109 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/5 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 12.04% of octets and 0.01% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.372M 6 10.05M
5 1.464M 14 10.36M
10 1.572M 20 10.80M
50 3.123M 58 16.80M
90 9.071M 59 42.15M
95 13.81M 59 60.10M
99 42.91M 59 138.9M
99.9 1.014G 119 3.679G
99.99 1.152G 120 3.801G
99.999 10.80G 121 5.512G
100 266.4G 121 7.650G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.76% 3.147G
Medium (100-1400B)6.16% 7.032G
Large (1401-1500B)82.51% 94.17G
Jumbo (>1500B)8.57% 9.787G
Total100.00% 114.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement39.00% 91.65T 12.79% 14.59G 1.47% 92.94k
Data Transfers23.13% 54.34T 33.04% 37.71G 36.97% 2.333M
Advanced Apps9.30% 21.85T 13.00% 14.83G 18.99% 1.198M
Encrypted Traffic5.49% 12.89T 7.76% 8.853G 6.45% 407.1k
File Sharing2.40% 5.643T 3.45% 3.933G 3.16% 199.6k
Misc0.24% 572.2G 0.47% 540.6M 0.58% 36.32k
Games0.23% 540.6G 0.36% 407.9M 0.45% 28.45k
Audio/Video0.21% 499.8G 0.30% 339.5M 0.50% 31.62k
Unidentified19.99% 46.98T 28.83% 32.91G 31.42% 1.982M
Total100.00% 234.9T 100.00% 114.1G 100.00% 6.310M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.100G900022Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
975.1M150060Unknown [17934]MREN [22335]Iperf
907.5M900010Abilene [11537]UCB [25]Iperf
409.0M150010CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Iperf
369.7M150013SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
313.6M150013CalTech [31]SWITCH [559]Iperf
298.9M150012Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
293.4M150012CalTech [31]U Florida [6356]Iperf
230.4M150019CalTech [31]GARR [137]Iperf
158.2M150014CalTech [31]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
387.9M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NCSA [1224]57254 -> 8889
270.2M150014U Minnesota [217]Indiana [87]Rsync
218.8M147911NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
199.4M150017NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
192.4M142010California SU [2152]PSC [1207]Audiogalaxy
157.8M150012UCAR [194]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]48305 -> 5102
142.1M150022U Minnesota [217]Unknown [18128]Rsync
114.7M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]UCAR [194]Hotline
110.6M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]West Virginia U [12118]Hotline
108.0M149960Indiana [87]Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 504.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers7.05% 137.6T 0.01% 166.7G
Measurement5.88% 114.8T 0.00% 25.86G
Advanced Apps2.02% 39.45T 0.00% 45.52G
File Sharing1.68% 32.70T 0.00% 51.27G
Encrypted Traffic1.12% 21.93T 0.00% 30.61G
Audio/Video0.68% 13.25T 0.01% 119.8G
Misc0.47% 9.250T 0.00% 21.07G
Games0.15% 2.928T 0.00% 5.654G
Unidentified80.95% 1.580P 99.97% 1.443P
Total100.00% 1.952P 100.00% 1.444P

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
3.85%
2.01%
0.70%
0.49%
---
75.18T
39.29T
13.67T
9.488T
---
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
101.4G
38.96G
16.71G
9.603G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
5.86%
0.02%
0.00%
---
114.4T
426.3G
29.63G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.12G
4.827G
411.6M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.01%
0.91%
0.08%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.75T
17.69T
1.588T
382.5G
17.32G
12.38G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.73G
17.57G
1.728G
397.0M
31.32M
61.98M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Carracho
WinMX
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Blubster
Direct Connect++
---
0.69%
0.45%
0.17%
0.13%
0.11%
0.11%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.54T
8.864T
3.414T
2.468T
2.229T
2.087T
61.14G
16.71G
11.12G
3.587G
2.924G
2.685G
5.369M
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.28G
11.89G
4.116G
2.514G
2.948G
4.347G
80.02M
26.01M
16.43M
4.372M
4.557M
36.44M
89.46k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
0.87%
0.23%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.04T
4.439T
374.2G
67.29G
2.647G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.41G
8.343G
744.7M
100.0M
8.597M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.47%
0.19%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.219T
3.648T
200.9G
111.9G
49.01G
21.01G
7.199G
1.783G
0.000
---
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
115.0G
4.235G
261.5M
152.3M
68.31M
28.35M
15.96M
9.070M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Squid
X11
Port 0
DNS
AFS
MS Windows
Telnet
IRC
NFS
SOCKS
NTP
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.19%
0.09%
0.06%
0.06%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.796T
1.685T
1.170T
1.115T
690.4G
311.8G
144.9G
84.99G
65.12G
60.21G
37.11G
33.18G
30.15G
19.20G
4.670G
143.6M
92.18M
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.771G
2.716G
1.747G
941.1M
5.504G
620.2M
1.438G
323.1M
274.8M
91.60M
58.82M
434.9M
50.38M
56.56M
38.20M
1.737M
420.1k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.11%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.179T
401.0G
194.0G
118.4G
25.59G
8.081G
1.895G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.260G
736.2M
1.397G
187.2M
52.82M
16.06M
4.260M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
80.95%
---
1.580P
---
99.97%
---
1.443P
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.952P
---
100.00%
---
1.444P

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.02% 426.3G 0.00% 4.827G
IGMP[2]0.00% 58.97M 0.00% 1.460M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 5.223G 0.00% 17.30M
TCP[6]23.02% 449.3T 0.03% 477.4G
UDP[17]3.01% 58.73T 0.01% 84.31G
IPv6[41]0.00% 11.32G 0.00% 30.17M
GRE[47]0.05% 914.3G 0.00% 1.550G
ESP[50]0.02% 374.2G 0.00% 744.7M
AX.25[93]0.00% 602.5k 0.00% 7.699k
PIM[103]0.00% 14.17G 0.00% 43.33M
IPMP[169]0.00% 29.63G 0.00% 411.6M
Other73.89% 1.442P 99.96% 1.443P
Total100.00% 1.952P 100.00% 1.444P

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)99.98% 1.443P
Medium (100-1400B)0.01% 133.0G
Large (1401-1500B)0.01% 194.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 12.38G
Total100.00% 1.444P

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]24.67% 481.6T 0.04% 535.0G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.04% 875.0G 0.00% 1.258G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 8.807G 0.00% 33.52M
Other75.29% 1.469P 99.96% 1.443P
Total100.00% 1.952P 100.00% 1.444P

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable73.98% 1.444P 99.95% 1.443P

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
1150552.74% 1.029P 71.31% 1.029P
1928252.73% 1.029P 71.30% 1.029P
80900.16% 3.124T 0.00% 3.304G
400000.12% 2.409T 0.00% 1.808G
191010.10% 2.044T 0.00% 2.269G