Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20051226

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20051226 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 56.65% of octets and 26.50% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.387M 6 10.05M
5 1.497M 14 10.50M
10 1.633M 18 10.95M
50 3.297M 57 17.04M
90 9.137M 59 43.32M
95 13.60M 59 60.77M
99 62.01M 59 194.8M
99.9 1.018G 119 3.703G
99.99 1.141G 120 3.807G
99.999 2.250G 123 5.044G
100 266.4G 126 7.093G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.32% 2.994G
Medium (100-1400B)4.22% 3.806G
Large (1401-1500B)81.57% 73.50G
Jumbo (>1500B)10.89% 9.809G
Total100.00% 90.11G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement45.19% 90.78T 15.51% 13.97G 1.74% 83.53k
Data Transfers22.05% 44.29T 33.83% 30.48G 40.45% 1.937M
Advanced Apps11.24% 22.57T 17.04% 15.35G 25.41% 1.217M
Encrypted Traffic4.39% 8.823T 6.71% 6.051G 5.21% 249.7k
File Sharing2.02% 4.065T 3.17% 2.853G 1.95% 93.36k
Misc0.21% 414.5G 0.34% 309.3M 0.26% 12.36k
Games0.10% 196.6G 0.15% 137.5M 0.20% 9.343k
Audio/Video0.08% 160.9G 0.12% 112.1M 0.21% 9.906k
Unidentified14.72% 29.56T 23.12% 20.83G 24.58% 1.177M
Total100.00% 200.8T 100.00% 90.11G 100.00% 4.790M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.254G900012Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
867.7M150060Unknown [17934]MREN [22335]Iperf
370.3M150011SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
369.6M150011Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
85.52M140530NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
79.25M150014CERN [513]U Florida [6356]Iperf
76.90M150010Unknown [25776]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]Iperf
73.01M142020SLAC [3671]UTDALL [20162]Iperf
68.77M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
66.97M150010CERN [513]CalTech [31]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
822.9M150060Unknown [17934]MREN [22335]X11
269.9M150015NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NCSA [1224]51457 -> 8889
247.6M148311NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
201.0M150018NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
166.3M149442Indiana [87]Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Rsync
165.2M150018UCAR [194]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]47861 -> 5102
158.2M150018NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
125.2M150015NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]UCAR [194]Hotline
107.7M148814NASA GSFC [1701]West Virginia U [12118]Hotline
105.1M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]West Virginia U [12118]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 370.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Measurement31.98% 113.3T 7.13% 24.23G
Data Transfers24.56% 87.07T 28.86% 98.13G
Advanced Apps11.20% 39.71T 13.46% 45.77G
Encrypted Traffic3.80% 13.47T 5.56% 18.88G
File Sharing3.57% 12.64T 5.64% 19.16G
Audio/Video1.71% 6.069T 2.11% 7.181G
Misc1.37% 4.872T 3.60% 12.25G
Games0.29% 1.019T 0.51% 1.718G
Unidentified21.53% 76.34T 33.14% 112.6G
Total100.00% 354.6T 100.00% 340.0G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
31.91%
0.06%
0.01%
---
113.1T
222.5G
21.69G
---
6.24%
0.80%
0.09%
---
21.22G
2.706G
301.3M
Data Transfers
NNTP
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
---
11.98%
7.34%
3.16%
2.07%
---
42.49T
26.03T
11.20T
7.343T
---
12.24%
10.16%
4.25%
2.21%
---
41.62G
34.55G
14.45G
7.499G
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
BBCP
McIDAS
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
5.39%
5.30%
0.41%
0.10%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.11T
18.77T
1.447T
340.3G
23.11G
10.84G
---
7.47%
5.38%
0.46%
0.12%
0.02%
0.01%
---
25.39G
18.28G
1.580G
416.0M
73.36M
20.14M
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.30%
0.41%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
---
11.71T
1.458T
265.3G
38.29G
787.3M
---
4.64%
0.76%
0.14%
0.02%
0.00%
---
15.77G
2.569G
485.7M
56.43M
3.811M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Hotline
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Blubster
Direct Connect++
---
1.43%
0.79%
0.57%
0.39%
0.34%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.074T
2.803T
2.018T
1.389T
1.223T
111.9G
13.40G
6.446G
723.0M
535.6M
253.8M
147.3M
52.12M
---
2.94%
0.84%
0.72%
0.56%
0.47%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.00G
2.855G
2.438G
1.919G
1.613G
305.8M
19.55M
10.03M
1.417M
968.7k
379.8k
1.527M
55.60k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.27%
0.39%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.500T
1.378T
108.1G
42.60G
25.55G
9.437G
3.051G
498.3M
0.000
---
1.55%
0.49%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.260G
1.678G
125.1M
59.16M
38.66M
13.05M
4.168M
2.612M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
X11
DNS
AFS
MS Windows
Telnet
NFS
IRC
NTP
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.41%
0.31%
0.25%
0.18%
0.13%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.442T
1.104T
892.2G
631.7G
462.6G
115.7G
69.82G
35.59G
33.66G
31.48G
29.02G
9.223G
8.008G
3.827G
1.408G
320.8M
14.90M
---
0.85%
0.56%
0.21%
0.27%
1.12%
0.10%
0.20%
0.06%
0.05%
0.06%
0.11%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.882G
1.900G
697.2M
920.2M
3.797G
324.6M
676.8M
200.5M
182.3M
201.9M
379.8M
28.95M
17.19M
31.06M
2.762M
6.359M
135.9k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.23%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
824.0G
132.7G
19.98G
19.37G
19.05G
2.861G
1.510G
---
0.36%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.207G
282.7M
30.77M
40.71M
147.0M
5.338M
4.063M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
21.53%
---
76.34T
---
33.14%
---
112.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
354.6T
---
100.00%
---
340.0G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 222.5G 0.80% 2.706G
IGMP[2]0.00% 54.56M 0.00% 1.251M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 3.590G 0.01% 18.26M
TCP[6]88.54% 313.9T 85.66% 291.2G
UDP[17]11.14% 39.51T 13.04% 44.32G
IPv6[41]0.00% 5.704G 0.01% 23.50M
GRE[47]0.16% 558.2G 0.24% 813.4M
ESP[50]0.07% 265.3G 0.14% 485.7M
AX.25[93]0.00% 72.60k 0.00% 1.100k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.586G 0.01% 27.61M
IPMP[169]0.01% 21.69G 0.09% 301.3M
Other0.01% 38.60G 0.02% 58.63M
Total100.00% 354.6T 100.00% 340.0G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.13% 136.4G
Medium (100-1400B)18.22% 61.96G
Large (1401-1500B)37.99% 129.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)3.65% 12.42G
Total100.00% 340.0G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.16% 333.8T 93.34% 317.3G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.12% 416.0G 0.19% 642.0M
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 1.582G 0.00% 6.785M
Other5.73% 20.30T 6.47% 21.99G
Total100.00% 354.6T 100.00% 340.0G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.34% 1.192T 0.25% 856.2M

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
80900.91% 3.222T 1.00% 3.394G
400000.87% 3.072T 0.67% 2.277G
191010.43% 1.541T 0.51% 1.720G
90010.36% 1.284T 0.48% 1.643G
80890.21% 756.5G 0.54% 1.829G