Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20051212

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20051212 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 46.50% of octets and 20.07% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.380M 6 10.05M
5 1.473M 14 10.41M
10 1.587M 22 10.93M
50 3.015M 58 17.40M
90 8.835M 59 43.32M
95 13.17M 59 58.90M
99 39.44M 59 141.0M
99.9 1.015G 119 3.676G
99.99 1.146G 120 3.793G
99.999 7.800G 126 3.862G
100 266.4G 126 5.515G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.68% 3.014G
Medium (100-1400B)6.58% 7.412G
Large (1401-1500B)82.08% 92.42G
Jumbo (>1500B)8.66% 9.748G
Total100.00% 112.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement38.45% 89.32T 11.78% 13.26G 1.38% 84.56k
Data Transfers24.12% 56.04T 34.66% 39.02G 40.24% 2.470M
Encrypted Traffic7.96% 18.48T 11.18% 12.58G 9.12% 559.8k
Advanced Apps6.22% 14.44T 8.78% 9.886G 11.46% 703.7k
File Sharing2.48% 5.758T 3.61% 4.068G 3.36% 206.5k
Misc0.23% 533.6G 0.35% 394.8M 0.53% 32.67k
Games0.21% 478.9G 0.30% 339.8M 0.41% 25.43k
Audio/Video0.18% 413.2G 0.26% 288.6M 0.43% 26.31k
Unidentified20.15% 46.82T 29.08% 32.74G 33.06% 2.029M
Total100.00% 232.3T 100.00% 112.6G 100.00% 6.139M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.200G900011Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
365.3M150015SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
341.9M150011Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
149.8M150060DESY-HAMBURG [1754]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]Iperf
124.1M150014CERN [513]U Florida [6356]Iperf
121.4M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Abilene [11537]Iperf
98.96M150030UCR-EDU [6106]Boston U [111]Iperf
90.22M150010SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf
88.00M142016NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
76.72M150010U Virginia, Charlottesville [225]Georgia Institute of Technology [2637]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
985.8M900045ORNL [50]SDSC [195]48970 -> 5150
527.4M900020ORNL [50]NCSA [1224]40374 -> 5150
346.7M150022PSC [1207]ORNL [50]48872 -> 5150
272.2M150033NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NCSA [1224]55967 -> 8889
228.1M147811NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
201.3M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
164.7M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
156.4M149923UCAR [194]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]47510 -> 5102
150.2M149960Indiana [87]Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Rsync
146.0M142013NOAA [6629]NIST-BOULDER [2648]SSH

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 505.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers27.68% 138.3T 29.94% 167.9G
Measurement22.42% 112.0T 4.32% 24.24G
File Sharing6.65% 33.23T 9.50% 53.32G
Advanced Apps5.72% 28.57T 6.15% 34.51G
Encrypted Traffic5.28% 26.40T 6.19% 34.70G
Audio/Video2.83% 14.12T 2.79% 15.64G
Misc1.75% 8.724T 3.64% 20.44G
Games0.58% 2.913T 1.21% 6.780G
Unidentified27.09% 135.3T 36.26% 203.4G
Total100.00% 499.6T 100.00% 561.0G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
14.44%
8.61%
2.80%
1.83%
---
72.14T
43.03T
13.99T
9.142T
---
17.49%
7.63%
3.15%
1.67%
---
98.10G
42.79G
17.68G
9.396G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
22.36%
0.06%
0.01%
---
111.7T
301.1G
25.72G
---
3.71%
0.65%
0.06%
---
20.79G
3.664G
357.3M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Gnutella
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Carracho
WinMX
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
2.42%
2.02%
0.65%
0.60%
0.50%
0.45%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.08T
10.08T
3.250T
3.014T
2.477T
2.230T
46.27G
21.10G
10.40G
4.994G
4.521G
2.973G
4.577M
---
3.98%
2.44%
1.40%
0.67%
0.45%
0.53%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.32G
13.71G
7.830G
3.736G
2.518G
2.994G
74.75M
25.78M
16.05M
78.36M
6.579M
3.836M
87.73k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
BBCP
McIDAS
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
3.53%
1.77%
0.34%
0.06%
0.02%
0.00%
---
17.64T
8.830T
1.676T
303.0G
103.7G
21.83G
---
4.18%
1.57%
0.31%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
---
23.43G
8.820G
1.743G
318.6M
150.7M
45.77M
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.45%
0.75%
0.08%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.23T
3.732T
390.3G
44.90G
1.376G
---
4.80%
1.25%
0.12%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.93G
7.032G
665.6M
68.40M
6.281M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
2.05%
0.71%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.25T
3.528T
191.9G
64.99G
52.75G
19.80G
6.776G
1.728G
0.000
---
1.96%
0.75%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.97G
4.192G
264.0M
91.03M
72.81M
31.63M
13.18M
7.134M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Squid
X11
Port 0
DNS
AFS
AOL AIM
IRC
MS Windows
NFS
Telnet
SOCKS
NTP
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.73%
0.28%
0.25%
0.20%
0.14%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.648T
1.393T
1.239T
1.020T
692.1G
248.9G
90.61G
89.51G
68.29G
61.49G
51.92G
47.44G
35.29G
31.78G
4.476G
1.103G
129.6M
---
1.17%
0.41%
0.40%
0.15%
1.05%
0.10%
0.02%
0.06%
0.11%
0.02%
0.04%
0.01%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.547G
2.276G
2.241G
836.4M
5.864G
550.9M
124.3M
331.9M
636.5M
115.8M
249.9M
71.41M
463.1M
70.10M
37.72M
24.35M
302.5k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.43%
0.07%
0.06%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.149T
330.6G
313.2G
86.61G
21.54G
9.906G
2.266G
---
0.59%
0.13%
0.45%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.301G
718.3M
2.542G
146.3M
42.78M
24.16M
4.613M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
27.09%
---
135.3T
---
36.26%
---
203.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
499.6T
---
100.00%
---
561.0G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 301.1G 0.65% 3.664G
IGMP[2]0.00% 51.92M 0.00% 1.142M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 875.8M 0.00% 5.521M
TCP[6]88.56% 442.5T 85.47% 479.5G
UDP[17]11.15% 55.71T 13.51% 75.78G
IPv6[41]0.00% 11.68G 0.01% 40.74M
GRE[47]0.14% 694.8G 0.26% 1.470G
ESP[50]0.08% 390.3G 0.12% 665.6M
AX.25[93]0.00% 244.5k 0.00% 2.566k
PIM[103]0.00% 6.752G 0.01% 46.24M
IPMP[169]0.01% 25.72G 0.06% 357.3M
Other0.01% 45.59G 0.01% 71.08M
Total100.00% 499.6T 100.00% 561.0G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.73% 222.9G
Medium (100-1400B)24.77% 138.9G
Large (1401-1500B)33.30% 186.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.20% 12.33G
Total100.00% 561.0G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]93.39% 466.6T 93.11% 522.4G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.51% 2.567T 0.59% 3.284G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 6.792G 0.00% 24.85M
Other6.10% 30.47T 6.30% 35.37G
Total100.00% 499.6T 100.00% 561.0G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.42% 2.083T 0.27% 1.509G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
80900.63% 3.163T 0.60% 3.348G
191010.55% 2.744T 0.54% 3.033G
400000.55% 2.724T 0.36% 2.041G
324590.33% 1.661T 0.37% 2.087G
200010.33% 1.638T 0.26% 1.467G