Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20051205

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20051205 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/5 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 5.21% of octets and 0.00% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.377M 6 10.05M
5 1.462M 15 10.41M
10 1.562M 24 10.93M
50 2.846M 58 17.33M
90 8.964M 59 45.86M
95 13.60M 59 61.80M
99 40.65M 59 135.5M
99.9 1.016G 119 3.681G
99.99 1.157G 120 3.792G
99.999 7.592G 124 3.850G
100 259.2G 125 3.943G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.58% 2.893G
Medium (100-1400B)6.93% 7.773G
Large (1401-1500B)81.83% 91.84G
Jumbo (>1500B)8.66% 9.721G
Total100.00% 112.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Measurement38.45% 89.11T 11.78% 13.22G 1.44% 86.28k
Data Transfers24.52% 56.82T 34.97% 39.24G 42.23% 2.535M
Encrypted Traffic7.44% 17.25T 10.45% 11.72G 8.24% 494.5k
Advanced Apps3.80% 8.815T 5.44% 6.108G 6.42% 385.3k
File Sharing2.91% 6.743T 4.24% 4.753G 4.22% 253.2k
Misc0.27% 633.2G 0.52% 584.9M 0.62% 37.18k
Audio/Video0.23% 524.9G 0.33% 372.5M 0.57% 34.33k
Games0.21% 481.1G 0.31% 350.4M 0.42% 25.03k
Unidentified22.18% 51.40T 31.96% 35.87G 35.86% 2.152M
Total100.00% 231.7T 100.00% 112.2G 100.00% 6.004M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.128G900012Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
742.8M150013BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Abilene [11537]Iperf
662.0M900010Abilene [11537]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
502.7M900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]Iperf
378.1M150011SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
273.3M150010Brookhaven National Lab [43]U Florida [6356]Iperf
140.6M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Abilene [11537]Iperf
129.4M150060DESY-HAMBURG [1754]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]Iperf
90.80M150015CERN [513]U Florida [6356]Iperf
85.34M150010Abilene [11537]SDSC [195]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
423.6M900036ORNL [50]NCSA [1224]40808 -> 5150
274.9M150019NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NCSA [1224]43238 -> 8889
233.6M147716NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
207.7M150021NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
161.5M150025UCAR [194]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]47424 -> 5102
156.0M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]EROS Data Center - USGS [5663]Hotline
139.2M150039Indiana [87]Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Rsync
131.2M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
127.5M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]UCAR [194]Hotline
126.8M142016NOAA [6629]NIST-BOULDER [2648]SSH

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 509.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers3.33% 148.3T 0.00% 181.6G
Measurement2.51% 111.8T 0.00% 24.67G
File Sharing0.91% 40.53T 0.00% 59.74G
Encrypted Traffic0.57% 25.57T 0.00% 33.75G
Audio/Video0.43% 19.24T 0.00% 20.34G
Advanced Apps0.40% 18.02T 0.00% 23.69G
Misc0.24% 10.69T 0.00% 22.88G
Games0.08% 3.653T 0.00% 8.847G
Unidentified91.51% 4.072P 99.99% 3.918P
Total100.00% 4.450P 100.00% 3.918P

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
1.90%
0.94%
0.29%
0.20%
---
84.75T
41.76T
12.84T
8.987T
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
114.4G
41.77G
16.17G
9.229G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.51%
0.01%
0.00%
---
111.5T
425.5G
31.13G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.75G
5.059G
432.4M
File Sharing
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
Gnutella
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Carracho
WinMX
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.32%
0.28%
0.12%
0.08%
0.06%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.03T
12.48T
5.119T
3.535T
2.706T
2.544T
51.33G
31.36G
14.79G
8.621G
4.200G
1.113G
16.06M
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.20G
17.20G
12.33G
4.524G
2.766G
3.426G
81.32M
34.89M
21.66M
133.6M
5.831M
2.123M
271.7k
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
0.46%
0.10%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.63T
4.602T
286.0G
46.72G
1.611G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
24.46G
8.641G
563.9M
76.43M
7.382M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.33%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.84T
4.011T
234.2G
63.25G
59.87G
24.16G
6.806G
2.885G
0.000
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.03G
4.768G
304.5M
96.66M
81.20M
38.59M
13.48M
14.32M
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
IBP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
0.36%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.18T
1.111T
398.6G
191.1G
104.6G
30.87G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.64G
1.274G
408.5M
162.1M
153.9M
51.69M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
X11
Squid
DNS
AFS
AOL AIM
MS Windows
IRC
NFS
Telnet
IDENT
SOCKS
NTP
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.10%
0.04%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.547T
1.666T
1.545T
1.440T
712.4G
237.4G
93.37G
91.18G
88.26G
82.62G
60.91G
51.16G
40.03G
36.60G
4.554G
297.6M
40.34M
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.980G
1.296G
2.225G
2.393G
5.810G
550.1M
139.4M
937.9M
445.9M
134.1M
266.0M
107.0M
73.36M
480.6M
39.10M
4.333M
430.9k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.590T
444.0G
397.5G
182.4G
23.35G
11.88G
3.190G
---
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.172G
928.1M
3.376G
283.4M
48.22M
30.77M
7.779M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
91.51%
---
4.072P
---
99.99%
---
3.918P
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
4.450P
---
100.00%
---
3.918P

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.01% 425.5G 0.00% 5.059G
IGMP[2]0.00% 37.15M 0.00% 859.6k
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 472.4M 0.00% 3.131M
TCP[6]10.51% 467.6T 0.01% 527.8G
UDP[17]1.42% 63.26T 0.00% 94.83G
IPv6[41]0.00% 14.03G 0.00% 51.82M
GRE[47]0.02% 810.9G 0.00% 1.693G
ESP[50]0.01% 286.0G 0.00% 563.9M
AX.25[93]0.00% 48.30k 0.00% 560.0
PIM[103]0.00% 6.435G 0.00% 40.69M
IPMP[169]0.00% 31.13G 0.00% 432.4M
Other88.04% 3.917P 99.98% 3.917P
Total100.00% 4.450P 100.00% 3.918P

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)99.99% 3.918P
Medium (100-1400B)0.00% 161.6G
Large (1401-1500B)0.00% 195.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 12.31G
Total100.00% 3.918P

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]11.26% 500.9T 0.02% 591.5G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.08% 3.415T 0.00% 4.285G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 10.40G 0.00% 38.17M
Other88.67% 3.945P 99.98% 3.917P
Total100.00% 4.450P 100.00% 3.918P

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.06% 2.476T 0.00% 1.762G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
4517562.88% 2.798P 71.42% 2.798P
2606462.88% 2.798P 71.42% 2.798P
80900.05% 2.413T 0.00% 2.577G
191010.04% 1.882T 0.00% 2.065G
200000.03% 1.549T 0.00% 1.649G