Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20031013

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20031013 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 24.17% of octets and 9.98% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.375M 5 10.05M
5 1.439M 13 10.35M
10 1.512M 21 10.65M
50 2.477M 58 15.00M
90 8.153M 59 34.05M
95 13.56M 59 47.42M
99 31.56M 59 95.85M
99.9 110.5M 59 415.0M
99.99 413.5M 59 2.584G
99.999 840.2M 116 6.202G
100 945.1M 119 7.072G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.95% 439.9M
Medium (100-1400B)11.13% 5.127G
Large (1401-1500B)87.92% 40.50G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 600.7k
Total100.00% 46.07G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers38.68% 25.32T 37.95% 17.48G 42.01% 1.278M
Encrypted Traffic9.42% 6.167T 9.28% 4.275G 6.84% 208.1k
File Sharing8.75% 5.726T 8.75% 4.032G 9.16% 278.7k
Measurement4.26% 2.789T 4.34% 2.001G 0.94% 28.57k
Advanced Apps3.27% 2.141T 3.51% 1.615G 3.60% 109.5k
Games0.66% 432.9G 0.71% 326.5M 0.90% 27.36k
Misc0.34% 219.6G 0.41% 188.9M 0.43% 12.98k
Audio/Video0.07% 48.19G 0.07% 33.89M 0.10% 3.116k
Unidentified34.54% 22.61T 34.98% 16.11G 36.01% 1.095M
Total100.00% 65.46T 100.00% 46.07G 100.00% 3.042M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
634.2M150021APAN-JP [7660]Testing as-name problem [65400]Iperf
564.1M149910PSC-NCNE [5050]LBL [16]Iperf
463.9M150010BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Testing as-name problem [65400]Iperf
457.5M150024PSC-NCNE [5050]ORNL [50]Iperf
410.5M147736PSC-NCNE [5050]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
168.5M150010SLAC [3671]Georgia Institute of Technology [2637]Iperf
151.1M150035SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]Iperf
119.5M150023CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
107.3M150023ORNL [50]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
98.62M150015SLAC [3671]Merit [237]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
945.1M150060APAN-JP [7660]Testing as-name problem [65400]Shoutcast
522.8M150015SDSC [195]UT-Austin [18]33790 -> 37306
431.4M150060SLAC [3671]U Florida [6356]32782 -> 5012
401.5M150060CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Testing as-name problem [65400]X11
390.8M810114CSUNET-NE [2153]CERN [513]HTTP
225.6M150012BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Testing as-name problem [65400]32910 -> 2630
127.7M150014PSC-NCNE [5050]ESnet-West [292]37843 -> 1901
125.0M150015NASA Internet [297]MIAMI-EDU [4511]Hotline
119.5M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]MIAMI-EDU [4511]Hotline
118.0M149827PSC-NCNE [5050]LBL [16]39442 -> 1901

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 252.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers27.39% 74.17T 18.52% 85.46G
File Sharing18.22% 49.34T 16.45% 75.91G
Encrypted Traffic3.66% 9.922T 2.45% 11.31G
Audio/Video3.33% 9.028T 3.08% 14.22G
Advanced Apps2.71% 7.334T 2.25% 10.40G
Measurement2.39% 6.476T 7.27% 33.57G
Misc1.73% 4.681T 2.51% 11.57G
Games1.57% 4.261T 2.33% 10.75G
Unidentified38.99% 105.6T 45.14% 208.3G
Total100.00% 270.8T 100.00% 461.5G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
NNTP
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
---
11.33%
9.90%
4.95%
1.21%
---
30.68T
26.80T
13.41T
3.272T
---
6.81%
7.62%
3.39%
0.69%
---
31.43G
35.18G
15.65G
3.197G
File Sharing
BitTorrent
FastTrack
eDonkey2000
Shoutcast
Gnutella
Hotline
Audiogalaxy
WinMX
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Carracho
Freenet
---
11.35%
1.90%
1.67%
1.06%
0.72%
0.47%
0.42%
0.39%
0.18%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
---
30.72T
5.132T
4.522T
2.883T
1.942T
1.269T
1.141T
1.052T
497.1G
147.4G
29.09G
948.7M
---
7.99%
1.44%
1.51%
0.60%
2.14%
0.30%
0.32%
0.61%
1.48%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
---
36.89G
6.653G
6.989G
2.759G
9.880G
1.396G
1.483G
2.807G
6.816G
171.3M
59.51M
3.437M
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.00%
0.62%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.137T
1.668T
103.4G
10.51G
2.402G
---
1.91%
0.49%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.821G
2.272G
196.5M
14.82M
4.932M
Audio/Video
Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Subset of VoIP
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
---
2.75%
0.36%
0.13%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
---
7.435T
982.0G
351.2G
77.44G
69.37G
56.87G
48.83G
6.587G
---
2.16%
0.30%
0.50%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.04%
0.00%
---
9.947G
1.380G
2.323G
148.1M
142.4M
98.45M
162.6M
21.97M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBFTP
IBP
GsiFTP
McIDAS
---
2.26%
0.37%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
---
6.107T
1.007T
147.6G
38.75G
32.73G
---
1.97%
0.22%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
---
9.082G
1.010G
164.5M
107.5M
38.10M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.36%
1.03%
0.01%
---
3.674T
2.783T
19.54G
---
0.72%
6.50%
0.06%
---
3.315G
29.98G
271.4M
Misc
Mail
AFS
Port 0
X11
DNS
MS Windows
AOL AIM
Squid
Telnet
NFS
IRC
SOCKS
IDENT
NTP
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.39%
0.32%
0.30%
0.18%
0.13%
0.09%
0.06%
0.06%
0.06%
0.04%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.061T
876.7G
816.7G
499.1G
353.1G
256.6G
175.6G
161.9G
156.5G
95.90G
85.63G
76.05G
38.15G
23.00G
3.258G
1.213G
200.1M
---
0.47%
0.20%
0.14%
0.16%
0.63%
0.43%
0.05%
0.06%
0.12%
0.04%
0.08%
0.03%
0.03%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.190G
911.1M
654.6M
728.6M
2.887G
1.965G
244.8M
293.1M
541.1M
207.2M
352.8M
140.6M
117.3M
301.4M
27.55M
8.829M
400.5k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
1.29%
0.20%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.495T
538.6G
119.7G
62.49G
31.45G
7.533G
5.926G
---
1.75%
0.28%
0.21%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.086G
1.310G
977.1M
304.0M
39.41M
13.76M
20.20M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
38.99%
---
105.6T
---
45.14%
---
208.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
270.8T
---
100.00%
---
461.5G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]1.03% 2.783T 6.50% 29.98G
IGMP[2]0.00% 66.54M 0.00% 1.359M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 5.551G 0.01% 27.40M
TCP[6]90.81% 245.9T 82.19% 379.3G
UDP[17]7.03% 19.03T 10.01% 46.20G
IPv6[41]0.00% 2.982G 0.00% 12.33M
GRE[47]1.08% 2.914T 1.17% 5.413G
ESP[50]0.04% 103.4G 0.04% 196.5M
AX.25[93]0.00% 50.39M 0.00% 320.8k
PIM[103]0.00% 10.57G 0.00% 22.26M
IPMP[169]0.01% 19.54G 0.06% 271.4M
Other0.01% 13.81G 0.01% 55.32M
Total100.00% 270.8T 100.00% 461.5G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)50.55% 233.3G
Medium (100-1400B)23.62% 109.0G
Large (1401-1500B)25.83% 119.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 5.526M
Total100.00% 461.5G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]92.24% 249.8T 94.44% 435.9G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.36% 982.9G 0.57% 2.610G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 5.201G 0.01% 38.68M
Other7.40% 20.02T 4.98% 22.99G
Total100.00% 270.8T 100.00% 461.5G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.31% 827.0G 0.13% 615.4M

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
22340.40% 1.070T 0.39% 1.783G
120000.34% 931.3G 0.24% 1.127G
50120.31% 843.3G 0.16% 724.6M
50110.28% 745.2G 0.14% 659.9M
10250.26% 711.4G 0.14% 659.7M