Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20030505

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20030505 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 21.82% of octets and 11.40% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time (often 30 minutes); typically, less than 1% of all bulk TCP flows have durations greater than that (see the 99th percentile of flow duration below). Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is slightly skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.371M 6 10.05M
5 1.431M 15 10.21M
10 1.497M 25 10.50M
50 2.275M 58 14.11M
90 6.405M 59 29.85M
95 9.680M 59 39.00M
99 24.67M 60 77.81M
99.9 76.64M 61 309.7M
99.99 264.2M 110 1.209G
99.999 439.3M 119 3.300G
100 467.0M 120 3.446G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.50% 205.4M
Medium (100-1400B)8.97% 3.693G
Large (1401-1500B)90.53% 37.28G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 0.000
Total100.00% 41.18G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers42.29% 25.09T 41.82% 17.22G 44.70% 1.399M
Encrypted Traffic8.00% 4.743T 7.95% 3.273G 5.03% 157.3k
File Sharing4.89% 2.901T 4.87% 2.005G 4.86% 152.2k
Measurement4.58% 2.718T 4.73% 1.947G 0.89% 27.72k
Advanced Apps3.82% 2.267T 3.77% 1.551G 3.28% 102.6k
Games0.84% 497.5G 0.85% 348.0M 1.13% 35.24k
Misc0.52% 308.3G 0.54% 221.5M 0.66% 20.56k
Audio/Video0.14% 81.44G 0.14% 55.89M 0.21% 6.666k
Unidentified34.92% 20.71T 35.35% 14.55G 39.26% 1.229M
Total100.00% 59.32T 100.00% 41.18G 100.00% 3.130M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
467.0M15001NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]ABILENE [11537]Iperf
465.4M150059ORNL [50]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
435.3M150011PSC-NCNE [5050]ORNL [50]Iperf
336.6M15001LBL [16]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
211.0M15007PSC-NCNE [5050]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
187.0M150015SLAC [3671]Merit [237]Iperf
155.4M150046PSC-NCNE [5050]LBL [16]Iperf
151.6M149948ESnet-West [292]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
143.6M15001SLAC [3671]GaTech [10490]Iperf
142.7M15001SLAC [3671]GARR [137]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
146.2M14122SDSC [195]NCSA [1224]60662 -> 1248
130.7M14731CalTech [31]UW-Milwaukee [7050]43429 -> 51362
128.8M150021UT-Austin [18]SDSC [195]34021 -> 53249
120.2M14141NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]USAN [194]Hotline
117.5M15001NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]MIT [3]Hotline
114.9M15001SLAC [3671]Merit [237]BBFTP
111.1M14881NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Boston U [111]Hotline
101.3M14291NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Merit [237]Hotline
101.0M150029SDSC [195]UT-Austin [18]53076 -> 33988
98.78M14202NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 263.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers27.75% 75.44T 23.85% 86.18G
File Sharing10.88% 29.58T 12.32% 44.52G
Advanced Apps2.90% 7.874T 2.62% 9.471G
Encrypted Traffic2.87% 7.794T 2.54% 9.191G
Audio/Video2.85% 7.757T 2.77% 10.00G
Games1.99% 5.410T 2.46% 8.896G
Misc1.84% 5.011T 4.63% 16.74G
Measurement1.15% 3.114T 1.23% 4.438G
Unidentified47.78% 129.9T 47.57% 171.8G
Total100.00% 271.9T 100.00% 361.3G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
NNTP
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
---
13.74%
8.50%
4.86%
0.65%
---
37.35T
23.12T
13.22T
1.754T
---
10.66%
8.57%
4.11%
0.51%
---
38.52G
30.95G
14.85G
1.844G
File Sharing
FastTrack
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
Hotline
WinMX
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Neo-Modus
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
---
6.26%
2.16%
0.52%
0.45%
0.42%
0.36%
0.30%
0.28%
0.08%
0.03%
0.00%
---
17.02T
5.873T
1.422T
1.231T
1.139T
992.1G
828.7G
752.6G
219.3G
91.88G
1.105G
---
5.60%
2.44%
1.53%
0.35%
0.75%
0.32%
0.27%
0.23%
0.79%
0.03%
0.00%
---
20.23G
8.816G
5.513G
1.274G
2.720G
1.164G
985.8M
847.4M
2.868G
100.6M
2.109M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBFTP
IBP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
---
1.81%
0.98%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
---
4.922T
2.651T
142.4G
116.4G
42.29G
---
1.69%
0.84%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
---
6.107G
3.035G
147.8M
124.4M
55.29M
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.59%
0.26%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.041T
706.3G
41.98G
3.123G
2.166G
---
2.20%
0.32%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.945G
1.141G
96.14M
4.169M
4.111M
Audio/Video
Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Subset of VoIP
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Backbone Radio
Camarades webcams
---
2.23%
0.37%
0.11%
0.05%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
---
6.060T
1.017T
291.0G
134.9G
126.3G
71.96G
55.79G
661.4M
---
2.11%
0.38%
0.11%
0.07%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
---
7.625G
1.374G
406.5M
240.7M
187.1M
101.8M
70.45M
2.949M
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
Spy Arcade
---
1.79%
0.12%
0.05%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.872T
317.7G
144.4G
60.30G
7.844G
4.393G
3.594G
---
1.87%
0.17%
0.35%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.771G
630.2M
1.280G
175.9M
25.02M
9.198M
4.185M
Misc
Port 0
Mail
DNS
AOL AIM
MS Windows
Telnet
Squid
X11
IRC
NFS
IDENT
SOCKS
AFS
NTP
RPC Portmapper
SNMP
RTIP
---
0.40%
0.36%
0.25%
0.24%
0.17%
0.11%
0.08%
0.05%
0.04%
0.04%
0.04%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.092T
965.8G
667.3G
649.3G
457.4G
293.1G
206.0G
136.6G
110.6G
105.6G
99.18G
98.89G
93.94G
18.33G
11.43G
3.349G
1.302G
---
0.23%
0.49%
1.88%
0.25%
0.97%
0.18%
0.08%
0.08%
0.15%
0.04%
0.05%
0.03%
0.07%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
827.2M
1.772G
6.802G
901.0M
3.515G
665.8M
279.3M
299.6M
545.8M
156.6M
193.6M
125.4M
270.7M
239.9M
99.38M
28.64M
18.59M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.06%
0.08%
0.01%
---
2.879T
217.3G
17.68G
---
0.71%
0.45%
0.07%
---
2.573G
1.619G
245.5M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
47.78%
---
129.9T
---
47.57%
---
171.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
271.9T
---
100.00%
---
361.3G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.08% 217.3G 0.45% 1.619G
IGMP[2]0.00% 960.1M 0.00% 2.422M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 7.499G 0.01% 50.83M
TCP[6]94.36% 256.5T 90.34% 326.4G
UDP[17]4.19% 11.38T 7.64% 27.61G
IPv6[41]0.01% 19.64G 0.01% 43.08M
GRE[47]1.33% 3.619T 1.43% 5.169G
ESP[50]0.02% 41.98G 0.03% 96.14M
AX.25[93]0.00% 71.88M 0.00% 476.5k
PIM[103]0.00% 12.15G 0.01% 34.88M
IPMP[169]0.01% 17.68G 0.07% 245.5M
Other0.01% 17.22G 0.01% 22.48M
Total100.00% 271.9T 100.00% 361.3G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.62% 150.4G
Medium (100-1400B)20.23% 73.11G
Large (1401-1500B)38.14% 137.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 9.704M
Total100.00% 361.3G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.02% 255.6T 94.34% 340.8G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.47% 1.265T 0.53% 1.919G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 6.917G 0.01% 34.45M
Other5.51% 14.97T 5.12% 18.51G
Total100.00% 271.9T 100.00% 361.3G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.30% 807.9G 0.17% 603.5M

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
68812.00% 5.447T 1.82% 6.570G
68820.93% 2.523T 0.85% 3.065G
22340.51% 1.385T 0.64% 2.323G
68830.49% 1.326T 0.45% 1.610G
68840.28% 758.9G 0.26% 928.6M