Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20020422

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20020422 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 28.71% of octets and 14.44% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time (often 30 minutes); typically, less than 1% of all bulk TCP flows have durations greater than that (see the 99th percentile of flow duration below). Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is slightly skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 366.1k 10 10.05M
5 1.198M 26 10.26M
10 1.361M 41 10.57M
50 1.881M 60 14.25M
90 4.435M 64 26.25M
95 7.034M 131 39.85M
99 20.32M 841 142.4M
99.9 111.4M 1801 726.6M
99.99 564.1M 1802 4.224G
99.999 594.8M 1803 4.536G
100 599.8M 1803 7.480G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.50% 1.544G
Medium (100-1400B)17.48% 10.81G
Large (1401-1500B)80.02% 49.49G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 0.000
Total100.00% 61.85G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers34.59% 29.55T 34.01% 21.03G 37.74% 1.499M
File Sharing20.87% 17.83T 20.31% 12.56G 26.86% 1.067M
Measurement10.86% 9.280T 11.42% 7.060G 0.66% 26.29k
Encrypted Traffic3.00% 2.560T 2.97% 1.838G 2.35% 93.47k
Advanced Apps1.50% 1.278T 1.54% 954.2M 1.68% 66.59k
Misc0.98% 838.0G 1.17% 724.3M 0.99% 39.49k
Games0.79% 676.8G 0.82% 508.8M 0.93% 36.95k
Audio/Video0.07% 60.56G 0.07% 45.61M 0.08% 3.177k
Unidentified27.35% 23.36T 27.68% 17.12G 28.71% 1.140M
Total100.00% 85.44T 100.00% 61.85G 100.00% 3.973M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
599.8M150059Argonne [683]NCSA [1224]Iperf
557.3M150061NCSA [1224]Argonne [683]Iperf
244.8M150010ESnet-West [292]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
231.5M150010LBL [16]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
179.5M149948CalTech [31]Argonne [683]Iperf
173.6M15001ORNL [50]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
171.4M149961CalTech [31]NCSA [1224]Iperf
160.7M142210SLAC [3671]GaTech [10490]Iperf
137.4M150010PSC-NCNE [5050]LBL [16]Iperf
116.4M150010PSC-NCNE [5050]ESnet-West [292]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
158.8M149814SLAC [3671]GaTech [10490]51603 -> 2928
144.9M150010ORNL [50]PSC-NCNE [5050]33871 -> 2000
138.1M15009MREN [22335]U Alaska [7774]58288 -> 1818
129.9M15008SURFnet [1103]U Alaska [7774]1833 -> 2027
128.4M15008U Alaska [7774]SURFnet [1103]1979 -> 1784
124.2M15008SURFnet [1104]U Alaska [7774]4847 -> 1360
119.7M139829SDSC [195]UT-Austin [18]50349 -> 51234
117.7M150029UT-Austin [18]SDSC [195]40806 -> 48923
110.5M149810U Alaska [7774]MREN [22335]1633 -> 57986
99.02M149862U Minnesota [217]NCSA [1224]1088 -> 8567

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 537.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
File Sharing44.92% 133.6T 49.86% 213.5G
Data Transfers22.93% 68.25T 18.48% 79.17G
Measurement3.57% 10.63T 2.55% 10.90G
Advanced Apps1.90% 5.668T 1.54% 6.595G
Misc1.70% 5.057T 2.67% 11.45G
Audio/Video1.52% 4.510T 1.73% 7.423G
Encrypted Traffic1.37% 4.068T 1.22% 5.215G
Games0.91% 2.715T 1.48% 6.342G
Unidentified21.18% 63.03T 20.46% 87.64G
Total100.00% 297.6T 100.00% 428.3G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
File Sharing
FastTrack
Gnutella
Audiogalaxy
Neo-Modus
eDonkey2000
WinMX
Hotline
Shoutcast
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
---
26.18%
9.67%
5.00%
1.87%
1.18%
0.38%
0.33%
0.16%
0.13%
0.03%
0.00%
---
77.90T
28.77T
14.87T
5.565T
3.514T
1.124T
989.1G
462.6G
386.1G
79.40G
1.262G
---
24.64%
17.23%
4.25%
1.49%
1.16%
0.34%
0.24%
0.15%
0.11%
0.26%
0.00%
---
105.5G
73.79G
18.19G
6.372G
4.973G
1.435G
1.045G
648.4M
472.9M
1.126G
3.224M
Data Transfers
NNTP
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
---
12.14%
5.29%
5.12%
0.38%
---
36.13T
15.75T
15.25T
1.125T
---
8.62%
5.17%
4.41%
0.28%
---
36.91G
22.16G
18.90G
1.183G
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
3.37%
0.19%
0.01%
---
10.04T
571.4G
18.96G
---
2.06%
0.43%
0.06%
---
8.803G
1.839G
263.4M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBFTP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
IBP
---
0.98%
0.80%
0.11%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.909T
2.386T
340.2G
22.02G
10.49G
---
0.96%
0.48%
0.10%
0.01%
0.00%
---
4.090G
2.041G
424.0M
27.97M
11.12M
Misc
AOL AIM
Mail
X11
Port 0
MS Windows
DNS
IRC
Squid
Telnet
IDENT
AFS
NFS
SOCKS
RTIP
SNMP
NTP
RPC Portmapper
---
0.54%
0.26%
0.24%
0.18%
0.09%
0.08%
0.08%
0.06%
0.04%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.601T
776.1G
706.2G
549.9G
279.4G
250.3G
243.3G
164.0G
113.9G
94.60G
90.31G
71.66G
41.63G
26.02G
18.17G
17.90G
12.05G
---
0.51%
0.37%
0.46%
0.10%
0.13%
0.42%
0.16%
0.06%
0.12%
0.05%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.10%
0.02%
0.05%
0.02%
---
2.199G
1.581G
1.974G
412.3M
556.6M
1.787G
686.2M
261.4M
503.6M
208.0M
255.2M
112.7M
61.95M
420.4M
90.61M
233.4M
105.3M
Audio/Video
Multicast
Real Player
Subset of VoIP
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
---
0.98%
0.33%
0.12%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.903T
994.8G
368.8G
93.97G
91.88G
30.16G
26.98G
198.5M
---
1.18%
0.32%
0.16%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
5.052G
1.371G
666.1M
142.1M
114.7M
39.24M
35.06M
1.970M
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec IKE
IPsec AH
---
1.21%
0.15%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.606T
448.6G
12.97G
434.5M
0.000
---
1.01%
0.20%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.322G
867.0M
24.85M
883.8k
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Quake
Battlenet
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
Spy Arcade
---
0.74%
0.10%
0.04%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.206T
285.8G
128.1G
78.16G
14.50G
1.668G
505.4M
---
0.68%
0.57%
0.14%
0.07%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.929G
2.457G
584.8M
295.0M
72.70M
1.655M
1.495M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
21.18%
---
63.03T
---
20.46%
---
87.64G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
297.6T
---
100.00%
---
428.3G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.19% 571.4G 0.43% 1.839G
IGMP[2]0.00% 381.2M 0.00% 4.126M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 29.16G 0.01% 29.75M
TCP[6]97.04% 288.8T 94.81% 406.0G
UDP[17]2.57% 7.640T 4.51% 19.30G
IPv6[41]0.14% 412.2G 0.12% 503.3M
GRE[47]0.03% 74.55G 0.03% 140.2M
ESP[50]0.00% 12.97G 0.01% 24.85M
AX.25[93]0.00% 129.6M 0.00% 608.1k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.383G 0.01% 25.50M
IPMP[169]0.01% 18.96G 0.06% 263.4M
Other0.01% 42.15G 0.03% 111.6M
Total100.00% 297.6T 100.00% 428.3G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)37.48% 160.5G
Medium (100-1400B)30.25% 129.5G
Large (1401-1500B)32.27% 138.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 967.6k
Total100.00% 428.3G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]89.81% 267.2T 91.14% 390.4G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]1.10% 3.283T 1.33% 5.713G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 12.05G 0.01% 27.43M
Other9.09% 27.04T 7.52% 32.19G
Total100.00% 297.6T 100.00% 428.3G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.03% 103.4G 0.06% 259.2M

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
86780.38% 1.121T 0.32% 1.378G
46360.37% 1.097T 0.45% 1.943G
14120.35% 1.049T 0.28% 1.193G
590.15% 455.1G 0.16% 665.6M
216140.12% 344.3G 0.06% 242.7M