Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20020415

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20020415 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 26.71% of octets and 13.34% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time (often 30 minutes); typically, less than 1% of all bulk TCP flows have durations greater than that (see the 99th percentile of flow duration below). Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is slightly skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 360.3k 10 10.05M
5 1.030M 25 10.29M
10 1.358M 38 10.61M
50 1.888M 60 14.34M
90 4.544M 63 26.68M
95 6.998M 154 39.90M
99 19.36M 881 153.9M
99.9 104.6M 1800 644.2M
99.99 500.2M 1802 3.739G
99.999 592.7M 1802 4.483G
100 598.1M 1803 4.678G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.49% 1.380G
Medium (100-1400B)20.80% 11.52G
Large (1401-1500B)76.63% 42.45G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.07% 39.15M
Total100.00% 55.40G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers31.54% 23.99T 31.44% 17.42G 33.57% 1.210M
File Sharing22.12% 16.82T 21.62% 11.97G 27.67% 997.5k
Measurement8.97% 6.822T 8.90% 4.932G 0.54% 19.38k
Encrypted Traffic2.95% 2.246T 2.95% 1.632G 2.19% 78.91k
Advanced Apps1.39% 1.060T 1.44% 800.2M 1.66% 59.88k
Misc1.11% 847.1G 1.35% 750.3M 1.11% 39.94k
Games1.02% 778.2G 1.05% 582.0M 1.22% 44.01k
Audio/Video0.09% 66.34G 0.09% 49.65M 0.09% 3.421k
Unidentified30.80% 23.42T 31.15% 17.26G 31.95% 1.151M
Total100.00% 76.05T 100.00% 55.40G 100.00% 3.605M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
598.1M149960Argonne [683]NCSA [1224]Iperf
557.9M150061NCSA [1224]Argonne [683]Iperf
250.6M150010ESnet-West [292]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
233.6M150010LBL [16]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
213.3M445261U Washington [73]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Iperf
176.4M149955CalTech [31]Argonne [683]Iperf
172.8M149954CalTech [31]NCSA [1224]Iperf
162.3M141210SLAC [3671]GaTech [10490]Iperf
160.1M150010ORNL [50]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
130.8M150010PSC-NCNE [5050]ORNL [50]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
159.6M149914SLAC [3671]GaTech [10490]62186 -> 2780
139.8M15009MREN [22335]U Alaska [7774]54273 -> 3382
125.5M15008U Alaska [7774]SURFnet [1103]3777 -> 3577
122.5M15009SURFnet [1103]U Alaska [7774]4481 -> 4680
119.1M140029SDSC [195]UT-Austin [18]33347 -> 56576
119.1M15009SURFnet [1104]U Alaska [7774]3334 -> 3824
119.1M150030UT-Austin [18]SDSC [195]9166 -> 63957
108.2M150010U Alaska [7774]MREN [22335]4070 -> 55423
99.83M150030NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Boston U [111]Hotline
95.28M150060U Minnesota [217]NCSA [1224]2718 -> 8750

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 497.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
File Sharing46.07% 131.2T 51.06% 212.0G
Data Transfers21.54% 61.35T 17.79% 73.90G
Measurement2.68% 7.644T 2.01% 8.333G
Advanced Apps1.90% 5.403T 1.52% 6.326G
Audio/Video1.84% 5.229T 1.95% 8.093G
Misc1.80% 5.120T 2.76% 11.44G
Encrypted Traffic1.30% 3.705T 1.17% 4.877G
Games1.00% 2.859T 1.63% 6.790G
Unidentified21.86% 62.25T 20.10% 83.49G
Total100.00% 284.8T 100.00% 415.3G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
File Sharing
FastTrack
Gnutella
Audiogalaxy
eDonkey2000
Neo-Modus
Hotline
WinMX
Shoutcast
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
---
25.61%
10.18%
4.79%
2.08%
2.06%
0.44%
0.42%
0.33%
0.14%
0.03%
0.00%
---
72.93T
29.00T
13.64T
5.918T
5.867T
1.243T
1.187T
933.0G
411.4G
77.92G
1.361G
---
23.86%
18.28%
4.13%
1.85%
1.63%
0.32%
0.37%
0.24%
0.13%
0.27%
0.00%
---
99.10G
75.91G
17.15G
7.667G
6.760G
1.327G
1.520G
987.7M
524.8M
1.112G
4.242M
Data Transfers
NNTP
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
---
10.30%
5.66%
5.34%
0.25%
---
29.33T
16.11T
15.19T
714.1G
---
7.46%
5.57%
4.57%
0.19%
---
30.99G
23.14G
18.98G
784.0M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.50%
0.18%
0.01%
---
7.125T
500.1G
19.77G
---
1.47%
0.47%
0.07%
---
6.124G
1.934G
274.6M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBFTP
McIDAS
IBP
GsiFTP
---
1.04%
0.67%
0.16%
0.03%
0.01%
---
2.949T
1.895T
447.4G
93.36G
16.77G
---
0.95%
0.42%
0.13%
0.02%
0.01%
---
3.929G
1.747G
535.0M
92.59M
21.44M
Audio/Video
Multicast
Real Player
Subset of VoIP
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Backbone Radio
Camarades webcams
---
1.25%
0.40%
0.11%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.552T
1.135T
308.9G
92.72G
71.69G
34.62G
33.23G
625.9M
---
1.36%
0.37%
0.14%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
5.647G
1.543G
584.0M
134.7M
90.03M
46.30M
46.24M
1.821M
Misc
AOL AIM
Port 0
Mail
X11
DNS
MS Windows
IRC
Squid
Telnet
AFS
NFS
IDENT
SOCKS
RTIP
NTP
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
0.53%
0.27%
0.26%
0.20%
0.09%
0.09%
0.09%
0.07%
0.05%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.510T
776.2G
738.0G
571.0G
267.0G
262.0G
258.6G
200.8G
154.0G
105.8G
84.97G
66.68G
46.62G
31.63G
18.89G
18.03G
9.926G
---
0.50%
0.15%
0.37%
0.44%
0.44%
0.11%
0.16%
0.08%
0.13%
0.07%
0.03%
0.04%
0.02%
0.13%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
---
2.077G
613.5M
1.525G
1.816G
1.840G
475.1M
671.5M
340.9M
541.3M
275.5M
115.1M
173.0M
77.69M
529.6M
246.4M
86.59M
39.28M
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec IKE
IPsec AH
---
1.14%
0.16%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.257T
442.0G
5.731G
413.6M
0.000
---
0.97%
0.20%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.045G
816.8M
14.38M
843.7k
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Quake
Battlenet
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
Spy Arcade
---
0.79%
0.11%
0.05%
0.05%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.250T
319.3G
138.6G
136.9G
11.78G
1.793G
635.9M
---
0.72%
0.67%
0.15%
0.08%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.986G
2.772G
615.6M
343.6M
68.16M
1.808M
1.193M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
21.86%
---
62.25T
---
20.10%
---
83.49G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
284.8T
---
100.00%
---
415.3G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.18% 500.1G 0.47% 1.934G
IGMP[2]0.00% 1.435G 0.01% 21.15M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 35.57G 0.01% 35.97M
TCP[6]96.25% 274.1T 94.05% 390.6G
UDP[17]3.31% 9.430T 5.19% 21.57G
IPv6[41]0.17% 480.7G 0.13% 556.0M
GRE[47]0.04% 116.0G 0.04% 168.0M
ESP[50]0.00% 5.731G 0.00% 14.38M
AX.25[93]0.00% 161.8M 0.00% 727.3k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.443G 0.01% 25.13M
IPMP[169]0.01% 19.77G 0.07% 274.6M
Other0.03% 88.97G 0.03% 125.7M
Total100.00% 284.8T 100.00% 415.3G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)37.47% 155.6G
Medium (100-1400B)31.73% 131.7G
Large (1401-1500B)30.79% 127.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.01% 40.30M
Total100.00% 415.3G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]89.68% 255.4T 91.36% 379.4G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]1.26% 3.598T 1.44% 5.972G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 12.62G 0.01% 27.15M
Other9.05% 25.78T 7.19% 29.86G
Total100.00% 284.8T 100.00% 415.3G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.05% 140.3G 0.07% 299.8M

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
14120.29% 837.7G 0.23% 942.4M
99900.19% 530.5G 0.12% 502.4M
31110.18% 526.7G 0.14% 594.6M
590.16% 452.1G 0.15% 615.8M
46360.16% 450.9G 0.20% 815.9M