Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20020401

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20020401 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Saturday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 22.34% of octets and 10.58% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time (often 30 minutes); typically, less than 1% of all bulk TCP flows have durations greater than that (see the 99th percentile of flow duration below). Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is slightly skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 334.7k 10 10.05M
5 778.0k 24 10.27M
10 1.334M 36 10.58M
50 1.843M 60 14.23M
90 4.774M 73 28.36M
95 6.771M 219 42.44M
99 18.33M 1011 143.3M
99.9 96.64M 1801 622.9M
99.99 158.9M 1802 1.202G
99.999 207.0M 1803 1.538G
100 232.2M 1803 2.357G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.75% 755.2M
Medium (100-1400B)23.07% 9.977G
Large (1401-1500B)75.18% 32.51G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 0.000
Total100.00% 43.24G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers26.00% 15.38T 26.41% 11.42G 25.49% 730.8k
File Sharing25.11% 14.86T 24.68% 10.67G 30.13% 864.1k
Measurement7.66% 4.535T 7.25% 3.133G 0.55% 15.85k
Encrypted Traffic3.35% 1.982T 3.26% 1.409G 2.60% 74.44k
Advanced Apps2.18% 1.290T 2.10% 908.2M 2.43% 69.74k
Misc1.70% 1.007T 1.94% 841.0M 1.79% 51.28k
Games1.08% 638.8G 1.08% 468.9M 1.19% 34.12k
Audio/Video0.14% 82.96G 0.14% 60.39M 0.18% 5.086k
Unidentified32.77% 19.39T 33.14% 14.32G 35.64% 1.021M
Total100.00% 59.18T 100.00% 43.24G 100.00% 2.867M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
232.2M150010LBL [16]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
178.0M149710ESnet-West [292]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
173.4M150060CalTech [31]NCSA [1224]Iperf
162.8M141210SLAC [3671]GaTech [10490]Iperf
116.4M141759SDSC [195]NCSA [1224]Iperf
110.9M150058NCSA [1224]CalTech [31]Iperf
110.8M149963CalTech [31]Argonne [683]Iperf
107.9M141060SDSC [195]Argonne [683]Iperf
106.5M150060NCSA [1224]Argonne [683]Iperf
93.93M150061U Minnesota [217]NCSA [1224]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
157.8M149814SLAC [3671]GaTech [10490]60507 -> 2234
150.7M15008SURFnet [1103]U Alaska [7774]3235 -> 1285
141.7M15009U Alaska [7774]SURFnet [1103]1777 -> 3727
121.0M139030SDSC [195]UT-Austin [18]61460 -> 36280
120.7M149929UT-Austin [18]SDSC [195]23033 -> 58984
110.7M150010MREN [22335]U Alaska [7774]48061 -> 1454
107.5M150010U Alaska [7774]MREN [22335]1224 -> 47684
100.6M149930NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Boston U [111]Hotline
83.81M15009U Alaska [7774]SURFnet [1104]1307 -> 2575
82.49M15009PSC-NCNE [5050]ORNL [50]32816 -> 49479

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 422.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
File Sharing48.43% 128.2T 54.49% 222.7G
Data Transfers19.54% 51.75T 15.86% 64.81G
Audio/Video2.50% 6.627T 2.24% 9.145G
Misc2.34% 6.193T 2.88% 11.75G
Advanced Apps1.98% 5.241T 1.51% 6.176G
Measurement1.94% 5.149T 1.48% 6.051G
Encrypted Traffic1.32% 3.509T 1.12% 4.578G
Games0.98% 2.593T 1.62% 6.607G
Unidentified20.97% 55.54T 18.81% 76.88G
Total100.00% 264.8T 100.00% 408.7G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
File Sharing
FastTrack
Gnutella
Audiogalaxy
Neo-Modus
eDonkey2000
WinMX
Hotline
Carracho
Shoutcast
Blubster
Freenet
---
25.83%
12.50%
5.02%
2.11%
1.86%
0.40%
0.34%
0.17%
0.17%
0.03%
0.00%
---
68.43T
33.10T
13.28T
5.588T
4.915T
1.070T
889.9G
452.5G
449.2G
73.28G
11.23G
---
25.15%
21.00%
4.11%
1.57%
1.53%
0.34%
0.24%
0.13%
0.16%
0.25%
0.00%
---
102.8G
85.85G
16.80G
6.414G
6.235G
1.391G
973.9M
542.9M
643.0M
1.037G
18.41M
Data Transfers
NNTP
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
---
7.55%
5.83%
5.78%
0.37%
---
20.00T
15.45T
15.31T
978.5G
---
5.58%
5.40%
4.60%
0.28%
---
22.82G
22.06G
18.80G
1.127G
Audio/Video
Multicast
Real Player
Subset of VoIP
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Backbone Radio
Camarades webcams
---
1.84%
0.43%
0.14%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
4.883T
1.143T
363.5G
104.3G
79.62G
27.44G
23.28G
1.220G
---
1.61%
0.38%
0.16%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
6.585G
1.562G
641.5M
177.0M
102.9M
39.30M
32.61M
3.794M
Misc
Port 0
AOL AIM
Mail
X11
MS Windows
IRC
DNS
AFS
Telnet
Squid
IDENT
NFS
SOCKS
NTP
RTIP
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
0.63%
0.62%
0.28%
0.18%
0.12%
0.11%
0.09%
0.08%
0.06%
0.05%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.679T
1.632T
736.4G
475.1G
327.7G
291.9G
228.8G
213.0G
162.3G
137.5G
96.49G
94.70G
56.36G
18.07G
18.02G
17.59G
7.204G
---
0.31%
0.54%
0.38%
0.32%
0.15%
0.16%
0.41%
0.10%
0.14%
0.05%
0.09%
0.03%
0.02%
0.06%
0.07%
0.02%
0.02%
---
1.255G
2.214G
1.564G
1.328G
613.4M
637.3M
1.687G
389.7M
591.7M
205.3M
353.1M
127.3M
75.93M
236.6M
285.7M
88.80M
101.4M
Advanced Apps
BBFTP
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
IBP
GsiFTP
---
0.94%
0.81%
0.16%
0.07%
0.01%
---
2.478T
2.137T
430.5G
174.6G
19.98G
---
0.61%
0.72%
0.13%
0.05%
0.01%
---
2.473G
2.955G
512.1M
206.7M
27.96M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.79%
0.17%
0.01%
---
4.746T
446.8G
23.20G
---
1.05%
0.43%
0.08%
---
4.272G
1.752G
322.3M
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec IKE
IPsec AH
---
1.17%
0.15%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.089T
405.6G
13.84G
470.2M
0.000
---
0.93%
0.18%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.784G
752.7M
40.34M
885.5k
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Quake
Battlenet
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
Spy Arcade
---
0.78%
0.13%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.057T
354.1G
110.6G
54.10G
15.49G
1.268G
255.2M
---
0.68%
0.72%
0.13%
0.06%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.772G
2.958G
551.1M
246.5M
77.20M
1.292M
452.4k
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
20.97%
---
55.54T
---
18.81%
---
76.88G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
264.8T
---
100.00%
---
408.7G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.17% 446.8G 0.43% 1.752G
IGMP[2]0.13% 348.0G 0.06% 238.2M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 4.409G 0.00% 6.701M
TCP[6]95.31% 252.4T 93.81% 383.4G
UDP[17]4.18% 11.07T 5.48% 22.37G
IPv6[41]0.15% 404.8G 0.10% 418.7M
GRE[47]0.01% 26.73G 0.02% 63.99M
ESP[50]0.01% 13.84G 0.01% 40.34M
AX.25[93]0.00% 172.4M 0.00% 756.0k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.475G 0.01% 26.67M
IPMP[169]0.01% 23.20G 0.08% 322.3M
Other0.06% 160.4G 0.08% 332.2M
Total100.00% 264.8T 100.00% 408.7G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.55% 157.5G
Medium (100-1400B)33.55% 137.1G
Large (1401-1500B)27.89% 114.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 1.039M
Total100.00% 408.7G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]89.14% 236.1T 91.07% 372.2G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]1.37% 3.627T 1.42% 5.812G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 26.48G 0.01% 40.87M
Other9.48% 25.10T 7.50% 30.65G
Total100.00% 264.8T 100.00% 408.7G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.04% 98.03G 0.06% 259.7M

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
44440.15% 406.7G 0.08% 326.6M
14120.15% 389.7G 0.11% 439.2M
13360.12% 310.9G 0.09% 360.6M
590.10% 265.5G 0.09% 381.4M
655200.06% 164.8G 0.04% 162.4M